"CAH" <madsgormlarsen@gmail.com> hath wroth:
>> The real problem will not be the technology, but the politics of
>> getting permission from the neighbors to trench their yard.
>Thanks to all the suggestions, but it has to be wireless.
>Cah
Ok, then be prepared to spend some money and pioneering. 2.4GHz and
5.6GHz will NOT work going through the trees and buildings. However,
900MHz might do it. 900MHz will NOT go through buildings, will not go
through mountains of dirt or concrete, and will be subject to far more
interference than 2.4GHz. It is also only legal in the US and
countries that do NOT have their cellular phone band at 915 to 928MHz.
The antennas will also be considerably larger in size and lower in
gain. The only good news is that it will go through some trees and
the coaxial cable loss is more reasonable.
<http://www.ubnt.com/super_range9.php4>
I believe there are some access points and wireless routers that use
this card, however I'm late for lunch so you do the searching.
Do some testing with a 900MHz cordless phone. If that works over the
distance, then you have a chance to make it work with data. Also, if
you want help with the path calculations, just ask. However, I will
need to know some details (i.e. numbers) about the endpoints and path.
--
Jeff Liebermann
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558