My home network is based on a Netgear DG834G router.
I'd like to connect a wired device in a remote room, and also if possible to
extend the overall wifi coverage.
I wonder if
- a wifi access point, suitably configured, is the proper device to do that;
- if it needs a special mode (client? bridge? WDS?);
- if the router also needs to support this mode (AFAIK, not the case on the
DG834G).
"Daniel CLEMENT" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:44ee9e35$0$27395$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
> Hello,
>
> My home network is based on a Netgear DG834G router.
>
> I'd like to connect a wired device in a remote room, and also if possible
> to
> extend the overall wifi coverage.
>
> I wonder if
> - a wifi access point, suitably configured, is the proper device to do
> that;
> - if it needs a special mode (client? bridge? WDS?);
> - if the router also needs to support this mode (AFAIK, not the case on
> the
> DG834G).
>
> TIA for any advice - regards,
>
> --
> Daniel CLEMENT
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you are wanting to kill two
birds with stone by using one gadget that will act as both a
wireless-ethernet bridge and a repeater?
I used to do exactly what you are trying to do with one of my DWL-7100AP's,
however it worked because it has two radios and I have both 802.11a and
802.11g/b networks in the air. I was able to repeat the 802.11a, while
plugging a device directly into it's WAN port and use the 802.11g in client
mode -- essentially making it both an "ethernet-wireless adapter" and a
repeater. It worked fine, but I later stopped using AP's in repeater mode
since its so unefficient use of hardware. This isn't an option with your
DG834G since it only has one radio though.
Seriously, your best bet is to just get two dedicated devices: an
ethernet-wireless adapter and something else to extend your wireless
network.
An ethernet-wireless adapter is clear cut, but for extending your wireless
network you'll want to think on that for a moment. Repeating cuts your pipe
in half, which may not mean anything if all your traffic is just
internet-releated, but becomes a bottleneck if you transfer files from
PC-to-PC around on your LAN often. This is why I stopped repeating. Much
more efficient ways to extend a home wireless network over "repeating" is:
- Run cable from your router to a remote AP, located somewhere to extend
your network most efficiently. Yeah, I know, having to run cable seems to
defeat the purpose of wireless, but unfortunetly its the way it is.
- Connect a remote AP to the router as above, but subsitute a computer for
the cable. The computer would have a wireless client hardware (PCI card,
external, whatever) along with a standard NIC. Bridge the two together. In
Windows, just control-right-click to select both, left click, select
"Bridge". Windows will bridge them together, then make another connection
named "Network Bridge". The MAC address for this "Network Bridge" is now
what your router will assign an IP against. From there, its just simply
plugging your AP into the NIC. If you give the AP an SSID that is the same
as the SSID being used by your router, your client stuff (i.e., a laptop)
"might" automatically/seamlessly switch between the two when you travel into
range of the stronger signal. My DLink stuff works this, but other
manufacturers might not. You'll just have to play.
- There are animals out there that use your existing electrical wiring as a
means of extension. They come as a kit of two devices: both of which plug
into an electrical socket. One either connects by CAT to a
router/switch/etc or runs a wireless client, while the other runs as an
access point. Never played with any of these, but they should get the job
done as long as the two electrical outlets are on the same circuit. (Same
fuse on the fuse box.) One of these days, I plan on getting a set of these
to play around with....
All from the same room: ethernet-wireless bridge for whatever device you are
wanting to connect and extending range --- without running cables or using a
printer:
Three pieces of hardware: ethernet-wireless adapter, a switch, and an AP.
Just connect everything to the switch.
Both the device and the AP get their pipe through the switch, so the pipe
doesn't get cut in half.
Switches are very cheap. I just bought a DLink DSS-5+ last week of Ebay for
$14. Works great.
"Eric" <nospam@nospam.snn> wrote in message
news:lTIHg.71266$vl5.46063@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com. ..
> Just thought of another way also.
>
> All from the same room: ethernet-wireless bridge for whatever device you
> are wanting to connect and extending range --- without running cables or
> using a printer:
Ugh, printer = "computer", of course.
There are many, many, ways to do what you want. Thats the beauty of
networks....
Thank you very much, Eric, for this extensive replies. Things are clearer
now. Let's assume I give up for a moment the wireless extension to focus on
adding an ethernet connection. I take examples from the brand I know:
1) could an AP like the Netgeat WG602 (maybe in "client mode"?) do it?
2) otherwise, is this kind (WGE111) of "gaming adapter" what you call an
ethernet-wireless adapter? (not so clear for me...) Note that the device
that will be plugged is not a game console, but a network drive.
3) any other device suggestion from yours welcome!
Regards,
--
Daniel CLEMENT
"Eric" <nospam@nospam.snn> wrote in message
news:bGIHg.79585$Eh1.1759@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com.. .
>
> "Daniel CLEMENT" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:44ee9e35$0$27395$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
> > Hello,
> >
> > My home network is based on a Netgear DG834G router.
> >
> > I'd like to connect a wired device in a remote room, and also if
possible
> > to
> > extend the overall wifi coverage.
> >
> > I wonder if
> > - a wifi access point, suitably configured, is the proper device to do
> > that;
> > - if it needs a special mode (client? bridge? WDS?);
> > - if the router also needs to support this mode (AFAIK, not the case on
> > the
> > DG834G).
> >
> > TIA for any advice - regards,
> >
> > --
> > Daniel CLEMENT
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you are wanting to kill two
> birds with stone by using one gadget that will act as both a
> wireless-ethernet bridge and a repeater?
>
> I used to do exactly what you are trying to do with one of my
DWL-7100AP's,
> however it worked because it has two radios and I have both 802.11a and
> 802.11g/b networks in the air. I was able to repeat the 802.11a, while
> plugging a device directly into it's WAN port and use the 802.11g in
client
> mode -- essentially making it both an "ethernet-wireless adapter" and a
> repeater. It worked fine, but I later stopped using AP's in repeater mode
> since its so unefficient use of hardware. This isn't an option with your
> DG834G since it only has one radio though.
>
> Seriously, your best bet is to just get two dedicated devices: an
> ethernet-wireless adapter and something else to extend your wireless
> network.
>
> An ethernet-wireless adapter is clear cut, but for extending your wireless
> network you'll want to think on that for a moment. Repeating cuts your
pipe
> in half, which may not mean anything if all your traffic is just
> internet-releated, but becomes a bottleneck if you transfer files from
> PC-to-PC around on your LAN often. This is why I stopped repeating. Much
> more efficient ways to extend a home wireless network over "repeating" is:
>
> - Run cable from your router to a remote AP, located somewhere to extend
> your network most efficiently. Yeah, I know, having to run cable seems to
> defeat the purpose of wireless, but unfortunetly its the way it is.
>
> - Connect a remote AP to the router as above, but subsitute a computer for
> the cable. The computer would have a wireless client hardware (PCI card,
> external, whatever) along with a standard NIC. Bridge the two together.
In
> Windows, just control-right-click to select both, left click, select
> "Bridge". Windows will bridge them together, then make another connection
> named "Network Bridge". The MAC address for this "Network Bridge" is now
> what your router will assign an IP against. From there, its just simply
> plugging your AP into the NIC. If you give the AP an SSID that is the
same
> as the SSID being used by your router, your client stuff (i.e., a laptop)
> "might" automatically/seamlessly switch between the two when you travel
into
> range of the stronger signal. My DLink stuff works this, but other
> manufacturers might not. You'll just have to play.
>
> - There are animals out there that use your existing electrical wiring as
a
> means of extension. They come as a kit of two devices: both of which plug
> into an electrical socket. One either connects by CAT to a
> router/switch/etc or runs a wireless client, while the other runs as an
> access point. Never played with any of these, but they should get the job
> done as long as the two electrical outlets are on the same circuit. (Same
> fuse on the fuse box.) One of these days, I plan on getting a set of
these
> to play around with....
>
> Have fun!
> -Eric
>
>
>
"Daniel CLEMENT" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
news:44eff8c5$0$27410$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
> Thank you very much, Eric, for this extensive replies. Things are clearer
> now. Let's assume I give up for a moment the wireless extension to focus
> on
> adding an ethernet connection. I take examples from the brand I know:
>
> 1) could an AP like the Netgeat WG602 (maybe in "client mode"?) do it?
>
> http://www.netgear.com/Products/Brid...nts/WG602.aspx
>
> 2) otherwise, is this kind (WGE111) of "gaming adapter" what you call an
> ethernet-wireless adapter? (not so clear for me...) Note that the device
> that will be plugged is not a game console, but a network drive.
>
> http://www.netgear.com/Products/Adap...rs/WGE111.aspx
>
> 3) any other device suggestion from yours welcome!
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Daniel CLEMENT
Hi,
Yeah, in "client mode" it should act just like a Wireless-Adapter Bridge.
Thats the characteristic of my DLink AP's when I run then in client mode.
Kind of overkill to use an AP just as a "client", but if the price is
similiar to that of an adapter, the extra features could come in handy later
anyway.
Yeah, a "Gaming Adapter" is pretty much synonymous with an
"Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridge" these days. "Gaming Adapter" was coined
by the marketing people in response to people that were buying
"Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridges" to use with game consoles. Its just
money-chasing. Guess they figure there are still a lot of people that
would've bought an "Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridge" for the console -- had
they known thats all they needed.
One exception is Microsoft's "Gaming Adapter". Their "Gaming Adapter" was
designed for the XBox. When you plug it into the XBox's ethernet port, it
causes a wireless configuration menu to be unlocked from the XBox's
dashboard. I think (?) that once its configured it can be used with any
ethernet device though. You just have to use an XBox to configure the
thing. I'm not sure as my XBox is connected via an "Ethernet-Wireless
Bridge". :^)
Can't really think of any other ways. *shrug* Guess if I were wanting to
have a non-computer device networked in a room, plus something extending my
coverage from the same room, I'd probably go with Ethernet-Wireless Adapter
+ Switch + AP -- and use the AP as a completetly additional AP (but with
same SSID as the SSID I'm wanting to "extend", on seperate channels as far
as possible after playing around to see which setup is most efficient),
instead of "repeating". Even if I did plan to have a computer in the room,
I'd probably still even get a switch, since I don't put much confidence in
Windows "Internet Connection Sharing" to remain rock-solid stable 24/7 over
a real hardware switch or router. Plus, I like to have my networks always
"alive", even when no computers are connected.
I think I'll go for an adapter or an AP, depending on which is cheaper. But,
should the price be similar, I'd certainly choose an AP, just is case I'd
need its other features in the future.
Best regards,
--
Daniel CLEMENT
"Eric" <nospam@nospam.snn> wrote in message
news:dF3Ig.71415$vl5.38453@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com. ..
>
> "Daniel CLEMENT" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
> news:44eff8c5$0$27410$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr...
> > Thank you very much, Eric, for this extensive replies. Things are
clearer
> > now. Let's assume I give up for a moment the wireless extension to focus
> > on
> > adding an ethernet connection. I take examples from the brand I know:
> >
> > 1) could an AP like the Netgeat WG602 (maybe in "client mode"?) do it?
> >
> > http://www.netgear.com/Products/Brid...nts/WG602.aspx
> >
> > 2) otherwise, is this kind (WGE111) of "gaming adapter" what you call an
> > ethernet-wireless adapter? (not so clear for me...) Note that the device
> > that will be plugged is not a game console, but a network drive.
> >
> > http://www.netgear.com/Products/Adap...rs/WGE111.aspx
> >
> > 3) any other device suggestion from yours welcome!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Daniel CLEMENT
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, in "client mode" it should act just like a Wireless-Adapter Bridge.
> Thats the characteristic of my DLink AP's when I run then in client mode.
> Kind of overkill to use an AP just as a "client", but if the price is
> similiar to that of an adapter, the extra features could come in handy
later
> anyway.
>
> Yeah, a "Gaming Adapter" is pretty much synonymous with an
> "Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridge" these days. "Gaming Adapter" was
coined
> by the marketing people in response to people that were buying
> "Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridges" to use with game consoles. Its just
> money-chasing. Guess they figure there are still a lot of people that
> would've bought an "Ethernet-Wireless Adapter/Bridge" for the console --
had
> they known thats all they needed.
>
> One exception is Microsoft's "Gaming Adapter". Their "Gaming Adapter" was
> designed for the XBox. When you plug it into the XBox's ethernet port, it
> causes a wireless configuration menu to be unlocked from the XBox's
> dashboard. I think (?) that once its configured it can be used with any
> ethernet device though. You just have to use an XBox to configure the
> thing. I'm not sure as my XBox is connected via an "Ethernet-Wireless
> Bridge". :^)
>
> Can't really think of any other ways. *shrug* Guess if I were wanting to
> have a non-computer device networked in a room, plus something extending
my
> coverage from the same room, I'd probably go with Ethernet-Wireless
Adapter
> + Switch + AP -- and use the AP as a completetly additional AP (but with
> same SSID as the SSID I'm wanting to "extend", on seperate channels as far
> as possible after playing around to see which setup is most efficient),
> instead of "repeating". Even if I did plan to have a computer in the
room,
> I'd probably still even get a switch, since I don't put much confidence in
> Windows "Internet Connection Sharing" to remain rock-solid stable 24/7
over
> a real hardware switch or router. Plus, I like to have my networks always
> "alive", even when no computers are connected.
>
> Have fun!
> Eric
>
>
>
>
Extend wired/wireless network 
Linear Mode
