On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.internet.wireless, in article
<477e8109-2cd8-4f63-a43a-995dacf0d76f@y4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, berk wrote:
NOTE: Posting from groups.google.com (or some web-forums) dramatically
reduces the chance of your post being seen. Find a real news server.
>"Ret." <xxx> wrote:
>> Remove the tick from the box that is located next to TCP/IPv6.
>> I did that and problem solved. My laptop now connects to the router
>> and the internet the moment it boots up!
This has been a fairly common problem with IPv6 aware operating
systems for eight-ten years.
>> So why didn't any of the customer support bods at either Medion
>> or Linksys come up with this solution?
Generally, they're not paid to think.
>I don't know but its getting to be a pretty common thing I check
>these days, early on.
It's getting somewhat less common, but RFC4697 (October 2006) speaks
to the problem of DNS servers that drop or ignore AAAA (name to IPv6
request).
>I'd love for IPv6 to take the lead and just have the older ver 4
>around for legacy use but I feel it's not ready for prime time yet.
Boy, is that putting it mildly. Your article headers say PacBell in
the US. As of mid-month, the five Regional Internet Registries
(AfriNIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE) had allocated or assigned
96735 networks (2,901,445,219 addresses) in IPv4 land around the
world. They also had allocated or assigned just 3537 IPv6 networks.
Looking only at the US, the numbers are 34834 IPv4 and 880 IPv6
networks. See
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space and
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space. While IPv6
allocations/assignments are large blocks (the _smallest_ IPv6
assignments are /64s (about 6.4 billion times existing IPv4 space),
only a tiny fraction (1/40th of 1 percent) of IPv6 space is in use.
Hold your breath? I sure wouldn't. Still, if you do have IPv6
connectivity to the world, a 'traceroute6' can be funny as even
backbone connectivity isn't as great as it could/will be.
Old guy