Re: all you professionals help please?

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:56 -0500, mseals
<mseals.33of30@no-mx.wirelessforums.org> wrote:

>i want to make several cantenna's and connect them via usb.

Connecting two cans with a USB cable will not work. The cable is too
heavy and the sound will not propogate down the USB cable. I suggest
using the standard "kite string" or "box string" between the cans.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:56 -0500, mseals
> <mseals.33of30@no-mx.wirelessforums.org> wrote:
>
>> i want to make several cantenna's and connect them via usb.
>
> Connecting two cans with a USB cable will not work. The cable is too
> heavy and the sound will not propogate down the USB cable. I suggest
> using the standard "kite string" or "box string" between the cans.

it's always fun trying to guess what the OP is thinking,
or the logic that is being used....

"P.Schuman" <pschuman_no_spam_me@interserv.com> hath wroth:

>Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:56 -0500, mseals
>> <mseals.33of30@no-mx.wirelessforums.org> wrote:
>>
>>> i want to make several cantenna's and connect them via usb.
>>
>> Connecting two cans with a USB cable will not work. The cable is too
>> heavy and the sound will not propogate down the USB cable. I suggest
>> using the standard "kite string" or "box string" between the cans.

>it's always fun trying to guess what the OP is thinking,
>or the logic that is being used....

It was late, I was bored, I needed some entertainment, etc.
The results are predictable.

I once had a High Skool English teacher, that would intentionally
misinterpret anything that was ambiguous. Besides being entertaining,
it was an excellent learning experience in proper writing and sentence
construction. His line was also something like "If you can't ask the
question, you don't deserve the answer". That doesn't really work on
Usenet due to the large number of English as a 2nd (or 3rd) language
users. Let's just say I'm continuing the tradition.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

"P.Schuman"

| it's always fun trying to guess what the OP is thinking,
| or the logic that is being used....

I don't need the OJT. I have a wife, a daughter, a daughter in law, a bunch
of grand daughters and ALL their friends ...

On Jan 24, 2:00 pm, "NotMe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> I don't need the OJT. I have a wife, a daughter, a daughter in law, a bunch
> of grand daughters and ALL their friends ...


OJT, OJT,,,,, OK, so if OP is Original Poster and you are referring
that, then Original, , no OJ is orange juice, no, aha ! On the Job
Training.

NIUWYAS. (Now I Understand What You Are Saying)

Someday our phrasing will be so limited and predefined, that we will
be able to eliminate all words and just use their first letter.

TGIF.