Re: Long cat5 run question

w_tom wrote:

>
> Asked and never answered is a damning question, "Where is surge
> energy dissipated?"
..
Repeating:
“I have provided information in the past on where surge energy is
dissipated, as in my post to DTC, but poor w_ wears religious blinders
that block conflicting information.”

Much of w_’s post is the same drivel about plug-in suppressors that has
no relevance to DTC’s post. But w_’s religious belief in earthing is
challenged by plug–in suppressors and he must prevent his universe from
collapsing.

Unfortunately for w_, both the IEEE and NIST guides say plug-in
suppressors are effective. Read the sources.

There are 98,615,938 other web sites, including 13,843,032 by lunatics,
and w_ can't find another lunatic that says plug-in suppressors are NOT
effective. All you have is w_'s opinions based on his religious belief
in earthing.

Still no answers to simple questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in
suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest
solution"?

Bizarre claim - plug-in surge suppressors don't work
Never any sources that say plug-in suppressors are NOT effective.
Twists opposing sources to say the opposite of what they really say.
Attempts to discredit opponents.
w_ is still a purveyor of junk science.

--
bud--