"Chip L" <chiplong@hotmail.com> hath wroth:
>In general, are the external USB/MiniPCI wireless adapters more
>sensitive (better reception) than the built in Wireless adapters?
I think you mean USB/MiniPCI. You probably alreay have a MiniPCI
wireless card is inside the laptop.
This is a difficult call. The official specification for receive
sensitivity tend to follow the chipset manufacturers published
specifications. Reality is always worse. RX sensitivity can be
ruined by a badly implimented diversity switch and cross circuit board
RF traces. My guess(tm) is that the radio parts are largely the same
between the various chipsets, but the implimentation and board layout
vary radically. I can't proclaim that one or the other style are
better or worse than the others. For example, this Compaq laptop
wireless antenna sucks:
|
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas...aq-2120us.html
due to the location of the antenna on the laptop hinge instead of up
high in the LCD section. In addition, USB dongles tend to have very
small and inefficient antennas:
|
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/wir...122/index.html
The antenna is the gold plated PIFA antenna on polysulfone. Most
antennas are worse.
>I really don't want to mod my box - its brand new. Was looking for
>something i could install in open ports (USB/minIPCI).
I think you mean USB/PCMCIA. You probably alreay have a MiniPCI
wireless card is inside the laptop.
I won't recommend anything specific. There are some PCMCIA cards
available with external antenna connectors.
http://www.ubnt.com/super_range_cardbus.php4 http://www.seattlewireless.net/SenaoCard
Only a few USB dongles come with external antenna connectors. Most
must be modified to accept an antenna connector. The advantage of USB
is that it can be located up high and away from obstructions without
stiff coax cable or complex modifications.
--
Jeff Liebermann
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558