"tg" wrote:
~ Aaron thankyou for your really good information, I now understand things a little clearer.
~ Now I understand why the only AP I've been able to bridge to is my other Cisco AP. But
~ finally - thanks to your advice - I've managed to bridge my Cisco AP to a non-cisco AP
~ using Universal Workgroup Bridge. A breakthrough at last. Many thanks again
Glad I could help. However, I need to post a correction to some misleading information
in my previous post:
~ ~ 2) is Universal Workgroup Bridge the same thing as the 'Wireless Distribution System'
~ ~ (WDS)?
~
~ Nope, they have nothing to do with each other.
~
~ WDS is a scheme on the infrastructure side whereby an AP can act as a common authenticator
~ (in the 802.1X sense) / key manager for a set of up to 60 infrastructure APs. The use of
~ WDS in the infrastructure should be transparent to clients.
Unfortunately, the "WDS" acronym has two meanings. My posting quoted above was intended
to refer to the (Cisco proprietary) Wireless DOMAIN Services (which we describe in
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wire...de/o13wds.html
etc.)
This has nothing to do with the Wireless DISTRIBUTION service "WDS" which term is used
by other WLAN industry players. I.e. a scheme by which infrastucture side connectivity
for the APs is provided wirelessly (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireles...ibution_System).
This again, is a non-802.11 standard mechanism (and so devices from multiple vendors will
likely fail to interoperate.) Cisco has several schemes for doing this (including the
Repeater and Link Role Flexibility features in autonomous IOS APs, and the mesh scheme
in our centralized architecture), but when we use the term "WDS", we always refer to
our Wireless DOMAIN Services feature.
Cheers,
Aaron