Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > alt.internet.wireless
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:02 AM
dar7yl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wireless-N - who's winning the wars?

I'm in the process of setting up a new wireless system for a small medical
office, and am contemplating which wireless-N router to use. DLink and
Linksys are immediately available, so they are at the top of my list. Which
one to choose? thankx.



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:15 AM
David Arnstein
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wireless-N - who's winning the wars?

In article <FiOAh.76167$Y6.43644@edtnps89>,
dar7yl <no_reply@accepted.org> wrote:
>I'm in the process of setting up a new wireless system for a small medical
>office, and am contemplating which wireless-N router to use. DLink and
>Linksys are immediately available, so they are at the top of my list. Which
>one to choose? thankx.


I don't know. But in the past, Buffalo Tech has made routers that are
more stable than DLink or Linksys. Check the reviews at Amazon.com,
for example. I too am thinking about upgrading to Wireless-N. But I
will wait for Buffalo Tech. In fact, I will wait for some user
feedback to accumulate. The magazine and website reviews do not
suffice. They never give sufficient weight to stability issues.
--
David Arnstein (00)
arnstein+usenet@pobox.com {{ }}
^^

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:33 AM
Larry Finger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wireless-N - who's winning the wars?

David Arnstein wrote:
> In article <FiOAh.76167$Y6.43644@edtnps89>,
> dar7yl <no_reply@accepted.org> wrote:
>> I'm in the process of setting up a new wireless system for a small medical
>> office, and am contemplating which wireless-N router to use. DLink and
>> Linksys are immediately available, so they are at the top of my list. Which
>> one to choose? thankx.

>
> I don't know. But in the past, Buffalo Tech has made routers that are
> more stable than DLink or Linksys. Check the reviews at Amazon.com,
> for example. I too am thinking about upgrading to Wireless-N. But I
> will wait for Buffalo Tech. In fact, I will wait for some user
> feedback to accumulate. The magazine and website reviews do not
> suffice. They never give sufficient weight to stability issues.


Be aware that the IEEE certification of the 802.11N specification is now scheduled to be completed
in September 2008. That is _NOT_ a typo - it is 19 months from now. Any pre-N device your buy now
may or may not interoperate with N devices from some other manufacturer. That said, the current
version of the spec is probably close enough to adjust the differences in firmware, but with the
deliberations secret, who knows.

Larry


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2007, 04:56 PM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wireless-N - who's winning the wars?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:33:21 GMT, Larry Finger
<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote in
<BLOAh.3138$5j1.261@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>:

>David Arnstein wrote:
>> In article <FiOAh.76167$Y6.43644@edtnps89>,
>> dar7yl <no_reply@accepted.org> wrote:
>>> I'm in the process of setting up a new wireless system for a small medical
>>> office, and am contemplating which wireless-N router to use. DLink and
>>> Linksys are immediately available, so they are at the top of my list. Which
>>> one to choose? thankx.

>>
>> I don't know. But in the past, Buffalo Tech has made routers that are
>> more stable than DLink or Linksys. Check the reviews at Amazon.com,
>> for example. I too am thinking about upgrading to Wireless-N. But I
>> will wait for Buffalo Tech. In fact, I will wait for some user
>> feedback to accumulate. The magazine and website reviews do not
>> suffice. They never give sufficient weight to stability issues.

>
>Be aware that the IEEE certification of the 802.11N specification is now scheduled to be completed
>in September 2008. That is _NOT_ a typo - it is 19 months from now. Any pre-N device your buy now
>may or may not interoperate with N devices from some other manufacturer. That said, the current
>version of the spec is probably close enough to adjust the differences in firmware, but with the
>deliberations secret, who knows.


The problem is that 802.11n is just now at Draft 1.10, is expected to go
to Draft 2.0 in order to address core issues in prior drafts, and is not
expected to be adopted until mid-2007, with final approval hopefully
before the end of 2007, although further delay is certainly possible.

I personally wouldn't buy any "draft N" product that isn't _guaranteed_
to be upgradable at _no_ cost to final N.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WiMAX Forum News, Weekly Clip Report March 22-29, 2007 badger_b@hotmail.com alt.internet.wireless 0 03-31-2007 02:14 AM
CFP: WIRELESS APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTING 2007 natty2006@gmail.com alt.internet.wireless 0 01-18-2007 04:35 PM
From Internet to Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi): A Study of Wi-Fi Public Hotspots Users. EsPUdeh@gmail.com alt.internet.wireless 1 07-31-2006 09:26 PM
Re: HELP - can reach ISP through cable, not through wireless ? Bob Newheart alt.internet.wireless 0 08-01-2005 11:53 PM
Hacking attempt? MoNk Wireless Networking Discussion 1 05-11-2005 10:21 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45