"Don Harvey" <dharvey@kc.rr.com> hath wroth:
>Anyone have a recommendation for a wireless outdoor security cam. My home
>office is in the basement with no window and I would like to be able to see
>what is going on outside.
When I worked in a concete tilt-up building and ended up facing a
blank wall, I spent much of my spare time painting a large piece of
butcher paper hanging on the wall, of what it would look like if there
were a large picture window installed. My artistic abilities are
rather limited, so it was mostly done by projecting a slide of a
photograph taken outside.
>It seems there are a lot of options available. I am using Windows Vista
>Premium with Linksys G wireless router.
I don't see why it needs to be wireless. It will be installed in the
same building where you're located. Running cables through a vent is
not particularly difficult. It would only need to be a video cable.
However, if you planning to try to create a wireless link going
through ground level dirt, it isn't going to work. The additional
attenuation of the foundation wall, floor, and outside wall, will
insure that the path will be useless. I strongly suggest you borrow a
wireless access router and wireless equipped laptop, and do a site
survey for signal strength and thruput. It takes a rather strong
signal to cram high frame rate video through a wireless link.
This site:
<http://www.networkcamerareviews.com>
seems to have a wide variety of wired and wireless camera reviews. I
have my favorites, but you won't like the price. The problem is that
the commodity wireless web cameras seem to have lousy imagers. For
low light, I like CCD imagers. For a decent picture, I like large
imagers with high resolution. Add a PTZ pedestal and a camera server
and price is rather high.
I recently setup a wireless camera using:
<http://www.stardot.com/netcamxl/index.html>
and a:
<http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/wireless-g-mimo-performance/wireless-g-mimo-performance-ethernet-converter/>
for the wireless link. Figure on $400 (used) for the 640x480 camera
and lens, plus $70 for the wireless bridge. The quality of the images
are really good, especially in low light. Note that the 3 Megapixel
imager is CMOS, while the others are CCD. Samples:
<http://www.stardot.com/netcamxl/samples.html>
Anyway, my point is that you don't really need an all in one unit. You
can use a commodity NTSC video camera, feed that to a video server,
and link it with either ethernet or wireless using a wireless bridge.
If have a digital camera with an NTSC video output, that can also be
used.
Nail down a price limit, and I can possibly offer more specific
suggestions.
--
Jeff Liebermann
jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558