Aussies don't surf the Mobile Web as much as Telstra would like them to

#1 (**permalink**) 04-15-2008, 09:04 AM

http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/au...025137230.html

It comes as no surprise, given how expensive it is. But for businesses
it's probably a good tool to utilise.

Not that the phones are much chop when it comes to navigating web sites
that are primarily designed to cater for screens with a resolution of
1024x768 and a min. of 800x600.

And it's treacle-slow to boot.

But this may be more of a function of the phone's processing power than it
is of the actual connected and download speed that's available.

#2 (**permalink**) 04-15-2008, 09:34 AM

Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com> wrote:

> http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/au...025137230.html

> It comes as no surprise, given how expensive it is.
> But for businesses it's probably a good tool to utilise.

> Not that the phones are much chop when it comes to navigating
> web sites that are primarily designed to cater for screens with a
> resolution of 1024x768 and a min. of 800x600.

Its fine with a decent phone.

> And it's treacle-slow to boot.

Pig ignorant lie.

> But this may be more of a function of the phone's processing power
> than it is of the actual connected and download speed that's available.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever
had a fucking clue and why you need to bludge off some damned union.

#3 (**permalink**) 04-15-2008, 10:46 AM

How would you know Rod Speed, you still have an AMPS handset, Motorola
brick.

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:66jb5lF2jnplkU1@mid.individual.net...
> Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/au...025137230.html
>
>> It comes as no surprise, given how expensive it is.
>> But for businesses it's probably a good tool to utilise.
>
>> Not that the phones are much chop when it comes to navigating
>> web sites that are primarily designed to cater for screens with a
>> resolution of 1024x768 and a min. of 800x600.
>
> Its fine with a decent phone.
>
>> And it's treacle-slow to boot.
>
> Pig ignorant lie.
>
>> But this may be more of a function of the phone's processing power
>> than it is of the actual connected and download speed that's available.
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever
> had a fucking clue and why you need to bludge off some damned union.
>

How would you know Rod Speed, you still have an AMPS handset, Motorola
brick. How dare you accuse him of bludging off a union, as you have done
nothing but bludge off the PMG and Social Security for years, living in your
own filth.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

#4 (**permalink**) 04-15-2008, 12:43 PM

"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:ad6d4$4804876c$27563@news.teranews.com...
> How would you know Rod Speed, you still have an AMPS handset, Motorola
> brick.
>

I thought he used a Walkabout 400..

#5 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 09:12 AM

thegoons wrote...

> >> And it's treacle-slow to boot.
> >
> > Pig ignorant lie.
> >
> >> But this may be more of a function of the phone's processing power
> >> than it is of the actual connected and download speed that's available.
> >
> > Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever
> > had a fucking clue and why you need to bludge off some damned union.
> >
>
> How would you know Rod Speed, you still have an AMPS handset, Motorola
> brick. How dare you accuse him of bludging off a union, as you have done
> nothing but bludge off the PMG and Social Security for years, living in your
> own filth.

The guy lives in fantasyland. He has no idea, whatsoever about whatever I
do, whether I bludge of unions, social security or whatever. He's full of
shit. Dunno why you chaps bother with him.

#6 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 08:55 PM