"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dtuklF35efm7U1@mid.individual.net...
> Clockmeister <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Clockmeister <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit
>>>>>> of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>
>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>
>>>> And if it wasn't for the Russians...
>
>>> They're completely irrelevant to us and the japs.
>
>> So is Iraq,
>
> Nope, its one of the things that ensures that the yanks will assist us if
> we need that.
The word of a yank is worth nothing, history has taught us that.
>> but there you go...
>
> I aint going anywhere...
You got that right, keep acting like a Liberal party apologist to keep it
that way.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dtuoaF36llekU1@mid.individual.net...
> atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com">
> wrote:
>> Alan Parkington wrote:
>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>
>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their
>>> 'Mon Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>
>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the
>>> world?
>> it could be worse and they be other Euro trash like the dutch .
>
> Pseudokrauts in fact.
>
Clockmeister wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> Nope, its one of the things that ensures that the yanks will assist
>> us if we need that.
>
> The word of a yank is worth nothing, history has taught us that.
Winston Churchill said: "you can always rely on the Americans to do the
right thing. After they've tried everything else".
Pretty apt. They would help us IF it was seen to be in their interests to
do so. No other reasons.
ant
--
Don't try to reply to my email addy:
I'm borrowing that of the latest
scammer/spammer
Clockmeister <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Clockmeister <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Clockmeister <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>>> And if it wasn't for the Russians...
>>>> They're completely irrelevant to us and the japs.
>>> So is Iraq,
>> Nope, its one of the things that ensures that the yanks will assist us if we need that.
> The word of a yank is worth nothing,
No one said anything about the word of any yank.
> history has taught us that.
You have never ever had a fucking clue about what
history has taught us, or anything else at all either.
The only thing you can ever manage is to crash cars.
>>> but there you go...
>> I aint going anywhere...
> You got that right, keep acting like a Liberal party apologist to keep it that way.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
ant <mrjideogundaremanager20@yahoo.dk> wrote:
> Clockmeister wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>>> Nope, its one of the things that ensures that the yanks will assist
>>> us if we need that.
>>
>> The word of a yank is worth nothing, history has taught us that.
>
> Winston Churchill said: "you can always rely on the Americans to do
> the right thing. After they've tried everything else".
>
> Pretty apt. They would help us IF it was seen to be in their
> interests to do so. No other reasons.
Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit
>>> of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
> Bullshit.
Fact.
> Get yourself a decent history book.
No use for you, you've clearly wanked yourself completely blind.
Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote:
> "will_s" <willsjunkremove@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4679d405$0$8915$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
>>
>> "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote in message
>> news:4679d036$0$22426$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>
>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5dtfmfF362j8tU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the
>>>>> benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>>>
>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>>
>>
>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet
>> again rule Britannia
>
> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the Australian mainland.........
Easy to claim. You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if the yanks
had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can have it'
Its unlikely that we would have done nothing if the yanks had chosen to ignore the japs
and that would have ensured that the japs would have had to do something about us
whatever their initial intentions with regard to australia might or might not have been.
Alan Parkington wrote:
> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>
> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>
> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
>
I 'ate Broccoli, so what
Yeah, I bought your mutt - and I 'ate 'im.
I 'ate 'is little face, I 'ate 'is guts, and I 'ate the way 'e's always
barkin'. So I gave 'im to the church.
Aye. I also 'ate the mess he left on me rug.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dua6uF368kgvU1@mid.individual.net...
> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote:
>> "will_s" <willsjunkremove@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4679d405$0$8915$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4679d036$0$22426$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>>
>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5dtfmfF362j8tU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the
>>>>>> benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet
>>> again rule Britannia
>>
>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the
>> Australian mainland.........
>
> Easy to claim.
It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary evidence to
suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland Australia and the senior
Japanese said there were no such plans at the end of the war.
Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes if
it wasn't for the yanks - how about putting your money where your mouth is.
> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
"IF"???
> the yanks
> had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can
> have it'
Pity that never happened, fuckwit.
Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans to
invade Australia.
> Its unlikely that we would have done nothing if the yanks had chosen to
> ignore the japs
> and that would have ensured that the japs would have had to do something
> about us
> whatever their initial intentions with regard to australia might or might
> not have been.
If, if, if........
All irrelevant to what actually happened.
Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5dtfmfF362j8tU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit of
>>> the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>
>
> Bullshit.
> Get yourself a decent history book.
>
hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade
and occupy mainland Aust long term.
Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>> will_s <willsjunkremove@optusnet.com.au> wrote
>>>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet again rule Britannia
>>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the Australian mainland.........
>> Easy to claim.
> It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary
> evidence to suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland
> Australia and the senior Japanese said there were no such plans at
> the end of the war.
Irrelevant to what they would have done about Australia if the yanks
had decided after Pearl Harbor that they didnt give a damn about
that attack and that they didnt care enough about the Philipinnes etc
to try to get it back after they had been booted out of there by the japs.
> Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
> yanks
No I didnt.
> - how about putting your money where your mouth is.
You cant do that on that claim that they would
have done nothing more than bomb Aust etc.
>> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
> "IF"???
Thats what was being discussed, what would have happened if the
yanks had decided to not do anything about the Japs and Europe.
>> the yanks had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can have it'
> Pity that never happened, fuckwit.
Thats what the word IF is there for, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.
> Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans to invade Australia.
Irrelevant to what they would have done if the yanks had said after
Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can have it'
>> Its unlikely that we would have done nothing if the yanks had chosen
>> to ignore the japs and that would have ensured that the japs would have had to do something about
>> us whatever their initial intentions with regard to australia might or might not have been.
> If, if, if........
> All irrelevant to what actually happened.
What was being discussed was what would have happened IF
the yanks had chosen to not fuck over the Japs and the krauts.
imorf <imorf@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote
> Kwyjibo wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit
>>>> of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>> Bullshit.
>> Get yourself a decent history book.
> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade and occupy mainland Aust
> long term.
How odd that they managed that fine right thruout SE
Asia with population numbers that left ours for dead.
Clockmeister wrote:
> "atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com"> wrote in message
> news:4679bf4b$0$1187$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> Alan Parkington wrote:
>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>
>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>
>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>> it could be worse and they be other Euro trash like the dutch .
>
> Ha ha, your type give Aussies a bad name.
>
> You should be ashamed.
>
> I mean, what sort of an arsehole wants to shoot lions in a lion park.
>
>
I am not an ozzie you dick head , and you are right I would rather you
for a target .
Rod Speed wrote:
> atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com">
> wrote:
>> Alan Parkington wrote:
>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>
>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their
>>> 'Mon Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>
>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the
>>> world?
>> it could be worse and they be other Euro trash like the dutch .
>
> Pseudokrauts in fact.
>
>
Bugga I hate agrement with you woddles
Clockmeister wrote:
> "atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com"> wrote in message
> news:4679c303$0$1187$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Alan Parkington <aparkington@telstra.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their
>>>> 'Mon Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>>> When they produced the metric system.
>> nothng good about the metrication , gimmie ' and " anyday
>
> Yeah but your an idiot who's opinion can be completely ignored.
>
>
>
yea ?
is that the best you can do cloghead .
Rod Speed wrote:
> atec 77" <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com <"atec 77 at hotmai dot .com"> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Alan Parkington <aparkington@telstra.net> wrote
>
>>>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>
>>>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon Dieus' at every
>>>> opportunity.
>
>>>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
>>> When they produced the metric system.
>
>> nothng good about the metrication ,
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>> gimmie ' and " anyday
>
> You dont qualify.
please explain woddles .
>
>
Stuart wrote:
> "Alan Parkington" <aparkington@telstra.net> wrote in message
> news:kKaei.16597$wH4.10609@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>
>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>
>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>>
>
> maybe if all countries walked around muttering and left the world to get on
> by it's self and not interfere we may all be better off...
>
>
That's not the human way though .
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5duf33F35lrl1U1@mid.individual.net...
> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>>> will_s <willsjunkremove@optusnet.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>
>>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>
>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>
>>>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet
>>>>> again rule Britannia
>
>>>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the
>>>> Australian mainland.........
>
>>> Easy to claim.
>
>> It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary
>> evidence to suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland
>> Australia and the senior Japanese said there were no such plans at
>> the end of the war.
>
> Irrelevant to what they would have done about Australia if the yanks
> had decided after Pearl Harbor that they didnt give a damn about
> that attack and that they didnt care enough about the Philipinnes etc
> to try to get it back after they had been booted out of there by the japs.
>
Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
>> Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes
>> if it wasn't for the yanks
>
> No I didnt.
>
Technically correct (for once). You claimed that *Jon* would have slitty
eyes if it wasn't for the yanks. A statement which you have so far failed to
back up with anything other than mindless 'if's.
>> - how about putting your money where your mouth is.
>
> You cant do that on that claim that they would
> have done nothing more than bomb Aust etc.
>
>>> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
>
>> "IF"???
>
> Thats what was being discussed, what would have happened if the
> yanks had decided to not do anything about the Japs and Europe.
>
Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
>>> the yanks had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad,
>>> you can have it'
>
>> Pity that never happened, fuckwit.
>
> Thats what the word IF is there for, you pathetic excuse for a lying
> bullshit artist.
>
Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
>> Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans
>> to invade Australia.
>
> Irrelevant to what they would have done if the yanks had said after
> Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can have it'
>
Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
>>> Its unlikely that we would have done nothing if the yanks had chosen
>>> to ignore the japs and that would have ensured that the japs would have
>>> had to do something about us whatever their initial intentions with
>>> regard to australia might or might not have been.
>
>> If, if, if........
>> All irrelevant to what actually happened.
>
> What was being discussed was what would have happened IF
> the yanks had chosen to not fuck over the Japs and the krauts.
Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
yanks.
Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>>>> will_s <willsjunkremove@optusnet.com.au> wrote
>>>>>> Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in
>>>>>>>>> tune with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest
>>>>>>>>> of the world as their oyster - something to be exploited for
>>>>>>>>> the benefit of the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>>>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>>>>> yep, we all know the poms came rushing down to save our bacon yet again rule Britannia
>>>>> Most of us know that the Japanese had no intention of invading the
>>>>> Australian mainland.........
>>>> Easy to claim.
>>> It sure is - Especially when there is absolutely no documentary
>>> evidence to suggest that Japan planned any invasion of mainland
>>> Australia and the senior Japanese said there were no such plans at
>>> the end of the war.
>> Irrelevant to what they would have done about Australia if the yanks
>> had decided after Pearl Harbor that they didnt give a damn about
>> that attack and that they didnt care enough about the Philipinnes etc
>> to try to get it back after they had been booted out of there by the japs.
> Irrelevant to your claim about *Jon* having slitty eyes if it wasn't for the yanks.
Nope. Absolutely relevant.
> Hypotheticals cut no mustard, child.
Pity my original which you made such a spectacular fool
of yourself commenting on was always that, fuckwit child.
>>> Try proving otherwise. You made the claim that we'd all have slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
>>> yanks
>> No I didnt.
> Technically correct (for once). You claimed that *Jon* would have slitty eyes if it wasn't for the
> yanks.
Must be one of those rocket scientist fuckwit children.
> A statement which you have so far failed to back up with anything other than mindless 'if's.
Pity your shit is completely irrelevant to what would have
happened IF the yanks hadnt got involved, fuckwit child.
"Don McKenzie" <look@mysig.com> wrote in message
news:4679a8fa$0$3166$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
> Alan Parkington wrote:
>
>> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>>
>> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
>> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>>
>> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
>
> <Basil Faulty's voice on>
>
> Well, they were able to get the Yanks to come and save them in two world
> wars for starters.
>
> <Basil Faulty's voice off>
>
Rod Speed wrote:
> imorf <imorf@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote
>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>> Bullshit.
>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade and occupy mainland Aust
>> long term.
> How odd that they managed that fine right thruout SE
> Asia with population numbers that left ours for dead.
a lot of which were colonial possessions in which the Japanese may have
been viewed initially as liberators?
so the further distance wouldn't be a factor?
so the support from Canada and NZ and maybe India that would have arisen
wouldn't be a factor?
imorf <imorf@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> imorf <imorf@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote
>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to
>>> invade and occupy mainland Aust long term.
>> How odd that they managed that fine right thruout SE
>> Asia with population numbers that left ours for dead.
> a lot of which were colonial possessions in which the Japanese may have been viewed initially as
> liberators?
Have fun explaining China.
And we didnt see a lot of the colonys welcoming the japs with open arms either.
And those that were that stupid quickly worked out what the japs were about too.
> so the further distance wouldn't be a factor?
Not really, once you have to do it using naval forces, once they are on the
ships etc, it really doesnt make a lot of difference how far they have to go.
> so the support from Canada and NZ and maybe India that would have arisen wouldn't be a factor?
Nope, Canada wasnt in any position to do anything useful.
India was having enough trouble keeping the Japs from knocking them
off next and stopping that arsehole Ghandi from joining the Japs etc.
NZ is too small to have mattered a damn to the Japs.
Alan Parkington wrote:
> I mean they are just so self-indulgent wankers..
>
> wanking around in an increasingly irrelevant country, spouting their 'Mon
> Dieus' at every opportunity.
>
> When was the last time that the French ever did anything for the world?
Well, for one, they bred some really cute French backpacker girlies,
including the one who displayed to me an admirable ability for the
sexual act which bears her country's name some years back...:-)
Kwyjibo wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>> You have absolutely no idea of what they would have done if
>
> "IF"???
>
>> the yanks
>> had said after Pearl Harbour 'ok if you want SE Asia that bad, you can
>> have it'
>
> Pity that never happened, fuckwit.
> Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The reality is that Japan had no plans to
> invade Australia.
SO why did they attack dawin and townsville ?
>
imorf wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5dtfmfF362j8tU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>>>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>>>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit of
>>>> the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>>> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
>>>
>>
>> Bullshit.
>> Get yourself a decent history book.
>>
> hmm, yes, I think it is unlikely Japan would have been able to invade
> and occupy mainland Aust long term.
The word is they had intended to get south to the townsville line though
and would ahve held it for some time .
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dtfmfF362j8tU1@mid.individual.net...
> Jon <internetexplorer14@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey lay off the French - they are beautiful people - more in tune
>> with an ethical world than is the US who look at the rest of the
>> world as their oyster - something to be exploited for the benefit of
>> the US and fuck the rest of the world.
>
> If it wasnt for the yanks, you'd have slitty eyes, child.
Australians will all have slitty eyes by the end of this century due to
unfettered migration from north of Oz
Re: I hate the French 
Linear Mode
