> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of the
> Privacy Act
Nope. And as usual your obnoxiousness shines through.
Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come naturally?
Further, you really need to brush up on your reading/comprehension skills. The
issue at hand isn't so much me able to access her account. We were able to
establish this from the outset, after I gave it a shot, knowing it probably
would fail and my wife giving me authorisation.
That was all explained in previous emails if you'd bother to read them in their
entirety, and not just grab onto the first sentence.
> > Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the contract with
> > Optus
>
> good luck, you'll need it
Maybe. Maybe not. Depends on what Optus has to say when she raises this with it
when she gets home. The TIO reamed Optus once before on her behalf over a
billing fuckup. It may happen again.
Anyway, she just called from Changi airport. No roaming, even at the home of
Optus. She's got a pre-paid SIM. Not sure which provider, though. Doesn't
matter. She SMS'ed me. I called her back via Mynetfone VOIP for a flat ten cent
call. Not bad, huh?
--
The things that come to those who wait will be the scraggly junk left by those who got there first.
Snapper wrote:
> Michael wrote...
>
>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of the
>> Privacy Act
>
> Nope. And as usual your obnoxiousness shines through.
>
> Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come naturally?
>
> Further, you really need to brush up on your reading/comprehension skills. The
> issue at hand isn't so much me able to access her account. We were able to
> establish this from the outset, after I gave it a shot, knowing it probably
> would fail and my wife giving me authorisation.
>
> That was all explained in previous emails if you'd bother to read them in their
> entirety, and not just grab onto the first sentence.
Give the poor boy a break! It took him two hours to read the first
sentence. He had to phone his mum twice to ask what "the" meant.
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:27:40 +1000 Snapper
<snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the
> > basics of the Privacy Act
>
> Nope. And as usual your obnoxiousness shines through.
>
> Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come
> naturally?
Maybe you can't get a job at Tel$tra unless you are obnoxious?
> > Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come
> > naturally?
>
> Maybe you can't get a job at Tel$tra unless you are obnoxious?
Dunno. Most people who I have spoken to at Telstra are OK. After all, they're
just the grunts who have to deal with the customers who are subjected to the
policies that their management put in place.
Of course, it's easy to lay into them as they're the first point of contact.
Like airline pax who bitch out the customer reps when they lose their baggage or
if the fog has grounded the aircraft. It's as if they think that these low level
staffers are the sole cause of their woes.
>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics
>> of the Privacy Act
>
> The Privacy Act does NOT prevent him passing on the message
> that they fucked up the roaming completely, you stupid pig ignorant
> completely illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
So the husbands calls up, and says, "OK, you fucked up the roaming"
And you want Optus to do what? They cant apply the roaming because they dont
have her permission to do it
>>> Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the contract with
>>> Optus
>
>> good luck, you'll need it
>
> Nope, if they cant deliver what the customer paid for, they get to provide
> a full refund,
Its not written into the contract that the customer is entitled to IntRoam
>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of
>> the
>> Privacy Act
>
> Nope. And as usual your obnoxiousness shines through.
>
> Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come
> naturally?
Its not difficult to point out your issues with the Privacy Act
> Anyway, she just called from Changi airport. No roaming, even at the home
> of
> Optus. She's got a pre-paid SIM. Not sure which provider, though. Doesn't
> matter. She SMS'ed me. I called her back via Mynetfone VOIP for a flat ten
> cent
> call. Not bad, huh?
> Of course, it's easy to lay into them as they're the first point of
> contact.
> Like airline pax who bitch out the customer reps when they lose their
> baggage or
> if the fog has grounded the aircraft. It's as if they think that these low
> level
> staffers are the sole cause of their woes.
Pot, kettle, black.
Exactly the whole issue with you and your wifes interactions with Optus on
this issue = "it's easy to lay into them as they're the first point of
contact"
> Human nature, I s'pose.
To act like a tool? Yes, we've established this with you
>
>>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of the Privacy Act
>> The Privacy Act does NOT prevent him passing on the message
>> that they fucked up the roaming completely, you stupid pig ignorant
>> completely illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
> So the husbands calls up, and says, "OK, you fucked up the roaming"
> And you want Optus to do what?
Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug crazed
pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
> They cant apply the roaming because they dont have her permission to do it
Corse they do, she gave her permission when she told them to do that when she bought the phone,
you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>>> Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the contract with Optus
>>> good luck, you'll need it
>> Nope, if they cant deliver what the customer paid for, they get to provide a full refund,
> Its not written into the contract that the customer is entitled to IntRoam
When they sold her the phone for use overseas, and she told them that she was about
to head overseas, and that she required international roaming when she bought the
phone and was heading off overseas in a day or so, thats all she needs, you stupid
drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of the Privacy Act
You in spades, you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>> Nope. And as usual your obnoxiousness shines through.
>> Do you get specialised training for this at Telstra or does it come naturally?
> Its not difficult to point out your issues with the Privacy Act
You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if it bit you on your lard arse, you
stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>> Anyway, she just called from Changi airport. No roaming, even at the home of Optus. She's got a pre-paid SIM. Not
>> sure which provider, though.
>> Doesn't matter. She SMS'ed me. I called her back via Mynetfone VOIP
>> for a flat ten cent call. Not bad, huh?
> What an effort just for a phone call.
Wouldnt be if Optarse hadnt fucked up completely TWICE, you stupid drug
crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
On Aug 10, 12:32 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael <mich...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You in spades, you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
> You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if it bit you on your lard arse, you
> stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
> Wouldnt be if Optarse hadnt fucked up completely TWICE, you stupid drug
> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
Immortalist wrote:
> On Aug 10, 12:32 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Michael <mich...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> You in spades, you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>> You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if it bit you on your lard arse, you
>> stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>
>> Wouldnt be if Optarse hadnt fucked up completely TWICE, you stupid drug
>> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
> Yowza! This is what happens?
It certainly is. But Rod actually likes Michael - and Michael actually
likes Rod abusing him like this. They're a strange couple, but they've
been together for well over a decade now!
> Exactly the whole issue with you and your wifes interactions with Optus on
> this issue = "it's easy to lay into them as they're the first point of
> contact"
Again, you display your supreme ability to totally misread what people are
saying.
I'll say it to you for the last time. I'm sick of trying to bash this into your
thick skull, metaphorically speaking. The Optus salesman who sold my wife the
phone said that "yes, global roaming will be activated with the service and yes
you will be able to make calls from overseas.".
As she relied on this dick to be able to do his job, it was not pursued any
further. Nor should it have had to going by the advice that we were given in the
shop.
Hence, why when the missus rocks up to the Optus shop tomorrow it's gonna be
good to watch the useless prick squirm.
And yeah, global roaming failed to work in the US, the UK and in Singapore, the
home of Optus. This is despite her being assured by the call centre droid that
it was indeed activated.
Snapper wrote:
> Michael wrote...
>
>> Exactly the whole issue with you and your wifes interactions with Optus on
>> this issue = "it's easy to lay into them as they're the first point of
>> contact"
>
> Again, you display your supreme ability to totally misread what people are
> saying.
>
> I'll say it to you for the last time.
Why??? Do you *really* care what he thinks???
> I'm sick of trying to bash this into your
> thick skull, metaphorically speaking. The Optus salesman who sold my wife the
> phone said that "yes, global roaming will be activated with the service and yes
> you will be able to make calls from overseas.".
>
> As she relied on this dick to be able to do his job, it was not pursued any
> further. Nor should it have had to going by the advice that we were given in the
> shop.
>
> Hence, why when the missus rocks up to the Optus shop tomorrow it's gonna be
> good to watch the useless prick squirm.
>
> And yeah, global roaming failed to work in the US, the UK and in Singapore, the
> home of Optus. This is despite her being assured by the call centre droid that
> it was indeed activated.
> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug crazed
> pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
It's all over. She's back and the Bobbiting is about to start.
Thing is, I accepted that I wouldn't be able to access her account but I gave it
a try, just in case. I did get the necessary details for her to call Optus to
get this resolved. She then called Optus, got it sorted out, and got global
roaming enabled on her mobile.
She also gave Optus her permission for me to access her account.
Then she tried it. It didn't work.
Then I called them back on her behalf. Guess what? They didn't even have any
records of her giving me authorisation. But I said that she spoke to you people
over the phone from New York about this. Anyway she spoke to her supervisor and
got back to me. Do you know the passcode. Yes, it's "michaelsawanker". Yep,
that's the one. She then confirmed that global roaming was activated. But I said
that if it was there's something wrong because it's not working. Sorry, I was
told, but I can't do anything more.
Fucking frustrating, particularly when you're talking to someone that you can
barely understand or who seems to have difficulties understanding you.
Anyway, as he aircraft taxiied to the terminal she turned the phone on. Voila!
Full signal bars. She SMS'ed me to let me know that she was safely on the
ground.
The thing is, the phone worked great despite all of this. She'd recommend the
N95 over the iPhone any day she was saying. It's a fad in the US in parts but
she couldn't figure out what was so great about it compared to other
smartphones, particularly when it lacks a lot of good features.
> It certainly is. But Rod actually likes Michael - and Michael actually
> likes Rod abusing him like this. They're a strange couple, but they've
> been together for well over a decade now!
They've been at it for THAT long now? Fuck, time flies, doesn't it?
Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote...
>
>> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug
>> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
>> fuckwit child.
>
> It's all over. She's back and the Bobbiting is about to start.
>
> Thing is, I accepted that I wouldn't be able to access her account
> but I gave it a try, just in case. I did get the necessary details
> for her to call Optus to get this resolved. She then called Optus,
> got it sorted out, and got global roaming enabled on her mobile.
>
> She also gave Optus her permission for me to access her account.
>
> Then she tried it. It didn't work.
>
> Then I called them back on her behalf. Guess what? They didn't even
> have any records of her giving me authorisation. But I said that she
> spoke to you people over the phone from New York about this. Anyway
> she spoke to her supervisor and got back to me. Do you know the
> passcode. Yes, it's "michaelsawanker". Yep, that's the one. She then
> confirmed that global roaming was activated. But I said that if it
> was there's something wrong because it's not working. Sorry, I was
> told, but I can't do anything more.
>
> Fucking frustrating, particularly when you're talking to someone that
> you can barely understand or who seems to have difficulties
> understanding you.
>
> Anyway, as he aircraft taxiied to the terminal she turned the phone
> on. Voila! Full signal bars. She SMS'ed me to let me know that she
> was safely on the ground.
> The thing is, the phone worked great despite all of this. She'd recommend
> the N95 over the iPhone any day she was saying. It's a fad in the US in
> parts but she couldn't figure out what was so great about it compared
> to other smartphones, particularly when it lacks a lot of good features.
Yeah, its essentially just the Job's marketing machine thats responsible for that.
He does that a lot better than Nokia ever does.
The other problem for Nokia is that they have dozens of models and
Jobs has just two. That makes it a hell of a lot easier to market too.
Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Will Kemp wrote...
>
>> It certainly is. But Rod actually likes Michael - and Michael
>> actually likes Rod abusing him like this. They're a strange couple,
>> but they've been together for well over a decade now!
>
> They've been at it for THAT long now? Fuck, time flies, doesn't it?
It does indeed. Wont be long before we are hobbling around with our
walking frames raving on about how things used to be back in the 90s.
> > The thing is, the phone worked great despite all of this. She'd recommend
> > the N95 over the iPhone any day she was saying. It's a fad in the US in
> > parts but she couldn't figure out what was so great about it compared
> > to other smartphones, particularly when it lacks a lot of good features.
>
> Yeah, its essentially just the Job's marketing machine thats responsible for that.
>
> He does that a lot better than Nokia ever does.
>
> The other problem for Nokia is that they have dozens of models and
> Jobs has just two. That makes it a hell of a lot easier to market too.
Yeah, all these models and you gotta wonder if there's a market for all of them
and how do people end up choosing which one that they want?
Whatever, I found something about the N95 that seems a bit odd. The camera's set
to full res. So pix taken are the best quality. However, you can't simply take a
photo and then MMS it. In other phones the taken photo is resized for
transmission. But with the N95 the missus said that she had to reset the
camera's settings to a lo res before taking photos that were to be MMS'ed.
It also locked up on her twice, requiring the battery to be removed. Thing is,
it didn't appear to have locked up. She noticed that something was amiss when
people were telling her that they'd been trying to call her. It was then she
realised that there was a problem. And then removing the battery and putting it
back in fixed it.
Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote
>>> The thing is, the phone worked great despite all of this. She'd
>>> recommend the N95 over the iPhone any day she was saying.
>>> It's a fad in the US in parts but she couldn't figure out what
>>> was so great about it compared to other smartphones,
>>> particularly when it lacks a lot of good features.
>> Yeah, its essentially just the Job's marketing machine thats responsible for that.
>> He does that a lot better than Nokia ever does.
>> The other problem for Nokia is that they have dozens of models and
>> Jobs has just two. That makes it a hell of a lot easier to market too.
> Yeah, all these models and you gotta wonder if there's a market for all of them
There clearly isnt with some of the more bizarre models of Nokia's.
Some of them sink without trace.
> and how do people end up choosing which one that they want?
Yeah, thats another reason why Jobs does so well, what I said in different words.
> Whatever, I found something about the N95 that seems a bit odd.
> The camera's set to full res. So pix taken are the best quality.
> However, you can't simply take a photo and then MMS it.
Depends on which camera you use. You do realise its got two ?
> In other phones the taken photo is resized for transmission.
> But with the N95 the missus said that she had to reset the camera's
> settings to a lo res before taking photos that were to be MMS'ed.
Not with the second camera.
> It also locked up on her twice, requiring the battery to be removed.
I've only had that happen just once.
> Thing is, it didn't appear to have locked up. She noticed that
> something was amiss when people were telling her that they'd
> been trying to call her. It was then she realised that there was a
> problem. And then removing the battery and putting it back in fixed it.
> > Whatever, I found something about the N95 that seems a bit odd.
> > The camera's set to full res. So pix taken are the best quality.
> > However, you can't simply take a photo and then MMS it.
>
> Depends on which camera you use. You do realise its got two ?
I assummed that it would, one for taking photos or video, the other for webcam
type operations.
Thing is, I don't use it, other than intial mucking about to set up wireless
networking to see how it works and some other things.
Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Whatever, I found something about the N95 that seems a bit odd.
>>> The camera's set to full res. So pix taken are the best quality.
>>> However, you can't simply take a photo and then MMS it.
>> Depends on which camera you use. You do realise its got two ?
> I assummed that it would, one for taking photos or video, the other
> for webcam type operations.
Nar, that isnt the distinction.
> Thing is, I don't use it, other than intial mucking about to set up
> wireless networking to see how it works and some other things.
> > Thing is, I don't use it, other than intial mucking about to set up
> > wireless networking to see how it works and some other things.
>
> And she's clearly a technoklutz |-)
She's not that bad, actually. She was able to get her laptop connected
wirelessly at various spots where it was available. Just that she hasn't really
had time to sit down and work out how the phone works.
As for technokutzness, I've seen her do stuff with Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Adobe
Audition and other high end programs that would make so called professionals
look positively amateurish. And that is what she is - an amateur. She doesn't
use these programs to make a living, just as a hobby.
Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Thing is, I don't use it, other than intial mucking about to set up
>>> wireless networking to see how it works and some other things.
>> And she's clearly a technoklutz |-)
> She's not that bad, actually.
You're only saying that coz she's been reading up on Bobbiting |-(
> She was able to get her laptop connected wirelessly at various spots where it was available.
Thats as bad as mine claiming that just because she can change a tire unaided, that that proves anything |-)
> Just that she hasn't really had time to sit down and work out how the phone works.
Or read the manual either.
> As for technokutzness, I've seen her do stuff with Photoshop,
> Dreamweaver, Adobe Audition and other high end programs that
> would make so called professionals look positively amateurish.
> And that is what she is - an amateur. She doesn't use these
> programs to make a living, just as a hobby.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6g8tqoFemnunU2@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of
>>>> the Privacy Act
>
>>> The Privacy Act does NOT prevent him passing on the message
>>> that they fucked up the roaming completely, you stupid pig ignorant
>>> completely illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
>> So the husbands calls up, and says, "OK, you fucked up the roaming"
>
>> And you want Optus to do what?
>
> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug crazed
> pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
Once. Hubby doesnt get to demand anything.
>>>>> Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the contract with
>>>>> Optus
>
>>>> good luck, you'll need it
>
>>> Nope, if they cant deliver what the customer paid for, they get to
>>> provide a full refund,
>
>> Its not written into the contract that the customer is entitled to
>> IntRoam
>
> When they sold her the phone for use overseas, and she told them that she
> was about
> to head overseas, and that she required international roaming when she
> bought the
> phone and was heading off overseas in a day or so, thats all she needs,
> you stupid
> drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
> fuckwit child.
"Immortalist" <reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f76c4eed-99fc-44a8-8f64-01d752ee72f6@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 10, 12:32 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Michael <mich...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> You in spades, you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate
>> arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>> You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if it bit you on your lard
>> arse, you
>> stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny
>> cleaning fuckwit child.
>>
>> Wouldnt be if Optarse hadnt fucked up completely TWICE, you stupid drug
>> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
>> fuckwit child.
>
> Yowza! This is what happens?
"Will Kemp" <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote in message
news:nYQnk.174369$IP7.63746@newsfe16.ams2...
> Immortalist wrote:
>> On Aug 10, 12:32 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Michael <mich...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You in spades, you stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate
>>> arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>> You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if it bit you on your
>>> lard arse, you
>>> stupid drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny
>>> cleaning fuckwit child.
>>>
>>> Wouldnt be if Optarse hadnt fucked up completely TWICE, you stupid drug
>>> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
>>> fuckwit child.
>>
>> Yowza! This is what happens?
>
> It certainly is. But Rod actually likes Michael - and Michael actually
> likes Rod abusing him like this. They're a strange couple, but they've
> been together for well over a decade now!
this is true.
Rod is very helpful, including off the forum. i had significant issues
setting up my wireless internet the first time, and rod spent a good deal of
time trading emails back and forth to help.
"Snapper" <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:r540a49e9h60c16sn7vkvnms0erdphkour@yarwho.com ...
> Rod Speed wrote...
>
>> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug crazed
>> pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit
>> child.
>
> It's all over. She's back and the Bobbiting is about to start.
>
> Thing is, I accepted that I wouldn't be able to access her account
Good, you took it like a man as you were told to
> Then she tried it. It didn't work.
LOL
> Then I called them back on her behalf. Guess what? They didn't even have
> any
> records of her giving me authorisation. But I said that she spoke to you
> people
LOL x 2
> Anyway, as he aircraft taxiied to the terminal she turned the phone on.
> Voila!
> Full signal bars. She SMS'ed me to let me know that she was safely on the
> ground.
> Whatever, I found something about the N95 that seems a bit odd. The
> camera's set
> to full res. So pix taken are the best quality. However, you can't simply
> take a
> photo and then MMS it. In other phones the taken photo is resized for
> transmission. But with the N95 the missus said that she had to reset the
> camera's settings to a lo res before taking photos that were to be MMS'ed.
Check your settings. I bought wife an N95, it takes pictures full res, try
to MMS them and it gives you a question something like "will convert to
lower res to send?" and you just press Yes
> people were telling her that they'd been trying to call her. It was then
> she
> realised that there was a problem. And then removing the battery and
> putting it
> back in fixed it.
thats a network issue, detached IMSI. and you cant tell until it happens
Michael wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6g8tqoFemnunU2@mid.individual.net...
>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the basics of
>>>>> the Privacy Act
>>>> The Privacy Act does NOT prevent him passing on the message
>>>> that they fucked up the roaming completely, you stupid pig ignorant
>>>> completely illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>> So the husbands calls up, and says, "OK, you fucked up the roaming"
>>> And you want Optus to do what?
>> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug crazed
>> pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
> Once. Hubby doesnt get to demand anything.
>
>>>>>> Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the contract with
>>>>>> Optus
>>>>> good luck, you'll need it
>>>> Nope, if they cant deliver what the customer paid for, they get to
>>>> provide a full refund,
>>> Its not written into the contract that the customer is entitled to
>>> IntRoam
>> When they sold her the phone for use overseas, and she told them that she
>> was about
>> to head overseas, and that she required international roaming when she
>> bought the
>> phone and was heading off overseas in a day or so, thats all she needs,
>> you stupid
>> drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
>> fuckwit child.
>
> Wont fly
Huh??? You mean "drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse
licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child won't fly"???
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6g8tqoFemnunU2@mid.individual.net...
>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> She just overlooked the fact that her husband doesnt know the
>>>>> basics of the Privacy Act
>>
>>>> The Privacy Act does NOT prevent him passing on the message
>>>> that they fucked up the roaming completely, you stupid pig ignorant
>>>> completely illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>
>>> So the husbands calls up, and says, "OK, you fucked up the roaming"
>>
>>> And you want Optus to do what?
>>
>> Fix the roaming they fucked up applying, TWICE, you stupid drug
>> crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny cleaning
>> fuckwit child.
Once by the shop, once by the Optarse fuckwit when she called from yankeeland.
> Hubby doesnt get to demand anything.
He does when she has authorised him to get it fixed, you stupid
pig ignorant completely illiterate lying dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>>>>> Anyway, she's gonna do whatever she can to terminate the
>>>>>> contract with Optus
>>
>>>>> good luck, you'll need it
>>
>>>> Nope, if they cant deliver what the customer paid for, they get to
>>>> provide a full refund,
>>
>>> Its not written into the contract that the customer is entitled to
>>> IntRoam
>>
>> When they sold her the phone for use overseas, and she told them
>> that she was about
>> to head overseas, and that she required international roaming when
>> she bought the
>> phone and was heading off overseas in a day or so, thats all she
>> needs, you stupid
>> drug crazed pig ignorant totally illiterate arse licking dunny
>> cleaning fuckwit child.
Re: International Roaming? Optus? Phhppt... 
Linear Mode
