Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the 21st
century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last century.
Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have evidence of harm
already and are trying to hush it up?
(maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of us.......)
Rod Speed wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>
>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>
>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of
>> last century.
>
> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with mobile phones.
>
>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>
> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>
>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of us.......)
>
> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even without any mobile phone.
"Will Kemp" <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote in message
news:jmEBl.195038$6t7.86659@newsfe21.ams2...
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>
>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the 21st
>>> century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of
>>> last century.
>>
>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with mobile
>> phones.
>>
>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have evidence of
>>> harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>
>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>
>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of us.......)
>>
>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even without
>> any mobile phone.
>
> Fried dog ****???
I noticed something on the sidewalk the other day.
It looked like dogshit.
It smelt like dogshit.
It tasted like dogshit.
Lucky I didn't step in it.
Rod Speed wrote:
> Will Kemp wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>
>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>
>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last century.
>
>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>> mobile phones.
>
>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>
>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>
>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>> us.......)
>
>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>> without any mobile phone.
>
>> Fried dog ****???
>
> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
The smell won't tell you it's fried. You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see
if it's texture was crispy.
Kwyjibo wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Will Kemp wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>
>>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last century.
>>
>>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>>> mobile phones.
>>
>>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>
>>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>
>>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>>> us.......)
>>
>>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>>> without any mobile phone.
>>
>>> Fried dog ****???
>>
>> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
> The smell won't tell you it's fried.
Wrong, as always.
> You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see if it's texture was crispy.
Rod Speed wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Will Kemp wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last century.
>>>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>>>> mobile phones.
>>>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>>>> us.......)
>>>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>>>> without any mobile phone.
>>>> Fried dog ****???
>>> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
>
>> The smell won't tell you it's fried.
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>> You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see if it's texture was crispy.
>
> Wrong, as always.
You're obviously a bit of a connoisseur of fried dog ****.
Will Kemp wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Will Kemp wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>>>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last
>>>>>>> century.
>>>>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>>>>> mobile phones.
>>>>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>>>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>>>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>>>>> us.......)
>>>>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>>>>> without any mobile phone.
>>>>> Fried dog ****???
>>>> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
>>
>>> The smell won't tell you it's fried.
>>
>> Wrong, as always.
>>
>>> You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see if it's texture was crispy.
>>
>> Wrong, as always.
>
> You're obviously a bit of a connoisseur of fried dog ****.
Will Kemp wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Will Kemp wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>>>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last
>>>>>>> century.
>>>>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>>>>> mobile phones.
>>>>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>>>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>>>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>>>>> us.......)
>>>>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>>>>> without any mobile phone.
>>>>> Fried dog ****???
>>>> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
>>
>>> The smell won't tell you it's fried.
>>
>> Wrong, as always.
>>
>>> You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see if it's texture was crispy.
>>
>> Wrong, as always.
>
> You're obviously a bit of a connoisseur of fried dog ****.
Alan Parkington wrote:
> If prolonged use of mobile telephones causes one to mutate into a
> slovenly cellar-dweller like "speedy" then I'm never using one again..
Too late. It's already turned you into something far worse - A top poster.
Kwyjibo wrote:
> Will Kemp wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Will Kemp wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>> Kwyjibo wrote
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/conte...8/s2533725.htm
>>>>>>>> Looks like the mobile telcos and manufacturers might become the
>>>>>>>> 21st century's equivalent to the tobacco industry of last
>>>>>>>> century.
>>>>>>> I doubt it. The evidence of any problem at all is MUCH less with
>>>>>>> mobile phones.
>>>>>>>> Would anyone be surpised if it turned out that they have
>>>>>>>> evidence of harm already and are trying to hush it up?
>>>>>>> Likely not, but the evidence of any problem is very weak indeed.
>>>>>>>> (maybe the tin-foil beanie nut jobs will outlive the rest of
>>>>>>>> us.......)
>>>>>>> Unlikely, the tin foil beanie frys their ear to ear dog **** even
>>>>>>> without any mobile phone.
>>>>>> Fried dog ****???
>>>>> Yeah, you can tell from the smell.
>>>> The smell won't tell you it's fried.
>>> Wrong, as always.
>>>
>>>> You'd need to taste the 'skin', to see if it's texture was crispy.
>>> Wrong, as always.
>> You're obviously a bit of a connoisseur of fried dog ****.
>
> He keeps reading your posts, doesn't he?
Kwyjibo wrote:
> Alan Parkington wrote:
>> If prolonged use of mobile telephones causes one to mutate into a
>> slovenly cellar-dweller like "speedy" then I'm never using one again..
>
> Too late. It's already turned you into something far worse - A top poster.
>
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:45:33 Alan Parkington may have written:
> If prolonged use of mobile telephones causes one to mutate into a slovenly
> cellar-dweller like "speedy" then I'm never using one again..
What the...?
ParkyBot's learnt how to post something other than mindless
reproductions of Telstra propaganda?
Yeah, the *******'s still top posting. Somebody should stop him before
it's too late!
Polly the Parrot wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:20:11 -0500, Paul Day <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote:
>
>> ParkyBot's learnt how to post something other than mindless
>> reproductions of Telstra propaganda?
>
> Not possible. Must be a forgery, except I noticed that the cretin is still
> top posting.
Horry wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:33:47 +0100, Will Kemp wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the *******'s still top posting. Somebody should stop him before
>> it's too late!
>
> **** off, Kemp.
The PROPER way to handle top-posters is to cancel the article, then hire
a hitman to kill the poster, his wife and kids, and smash his computer
into little bits.
Anything more is just extremism.
Will Kemp <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote:
> Yeah, the *******'s still top posting. Somebody should stop him before
> it's too late!
>
> Polly the Parrot wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:20:11 -0500, Paul Day <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote:
> >
> >> ParkyBot's learnt how to post something other than mindless
> >> reproductions of Telstra propaganda?
> >
> > Not possible. Must be a forgery, except I noticed that the cretin is still
> > top posting.
Or you could do what the silly little boys around here do - stamp your
feet and curl your upper lip menacingly.
Frank Slootweg wrote:
> The PROPER way to handle top-posters is to cancel the article, then hire
> a hitman to kill the poster, his wife and kids, and smash his computer
> into little bits.
>
> Anything more is just extremism.
>
> Will Kemp <will@xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote:
>> Yeah, the *******'s still top posting. Somebody should stop him before
>> it's too late!
>>
>> Polly the Parrot wrote:
>>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:20:11 -0500, Paul Day <pauls@enigma.id.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ParkyBot's learnt how to post something other than mindless
>>>> reproductions of Telstra propaganda?
>>> Not possible. Must be a forgery, except I noticed that the cretin is still
>>> top posting.
Mobile phone risk 
Linear Mode
