Ping Mr Michael J. Ellis

I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
"tentatively low".

What have you been up to over there?

Horry <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only "tentatively low".

> What have you been up to over there?

Its always been a bum boy.

Horry wrote...

>
> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
> "tentatively low".

How is that aura thing worked out?

Snapper <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote
> Horry wrote

>> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only "tentatively low".

> How is that aura thing worked out?

http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura

Thats the first hit with google.

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:54:38 +1000, Snapper wrote:

> Horry wrote...
>
>
>> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
>> "tentatively low".
>
> How is that aura thing worked out?

Users with an Aura ranking that is prefixed with the word "Pervasively"
have received a large amount of votes from other users (300+), and as
such their Aura is likely to be highly representative of the collective
community opinion of them.

"Horry" <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g5sbqb$a68$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
> "tentatively low".

Telling it like it is

Rod Speed wrote...

> > How is that aura thing worked out?
>
> http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
>
> Thats the first hit with google.

Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I still
can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but I can't
see any options on that.

Snapper wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote...
>
>>> How is that aura thing worked out?
>> http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
>>
>> Thats the first hit with google.
>
> Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I still
> can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but I can't
> see any options on that.

Click on one of the little smiley faces below the user's name in a forum
post.

Horry <horacewachope@gmail.com> writes:


>I see your Whirlpool Aura is "pervasively low", whereas mine is only
>"tentatively low".

>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gal...g2_itemId=4385

>What have you been up to over there?

>http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gal...g2_itemId=4313

--
Good day parishioners! Welcome to the Church of the Great Reverend Bavid RP
Dromage! Defender of the Free World from things which G.O.D Inc. thinks you
shouldn't be allowed to talk about in free society. Fuck the French Faggots!
http://www.southwestslutbags.com/gal...p?g2_itemId=53 Fuck the Jews!

Will Kemp wrote...

> Click on one of the little smiley faces below the user's name in a forum
> post.

Yep, saw them. But even so there's nothing obvious to suggest what they're for
other than a highlight.

"Snapper" <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:eam884t57hng5najh0i3hraranrne065ql@yarwho.com ...
> Rod Speed wrote...
>
>> > How is that aura thing worked out?
>>
>> http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
>>
>> Thats the first hit with google.
>
> Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I
> still
> can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but I
> can't
> see any options on that.

Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
intenet


>
>

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:53:59 +0000, Michael wrote:

> "Snapper" <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:eam884t57hng5najh0i3hraranrne065ql@yarwho.com ...
>> Rod Speed wrote...
>>
>>> > How is that aura thing worked out?
>>>
>>> http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/?tag=WP_Aura
>>>
>>> Thats the first hit with google.
>>
>> Thanks. I really must be going downhill. I read through it twice and I
>> still
>> can't work out how a user's aura is set. It talks about peer voting but
>> I can't
>> see any options on that.
>
> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
> intenet

Only dickheads care what others think of them in real life.

Michael wrote...

> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
> intenet

Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come out as one
of these dickheads.

And an obnoxious one at that.

"Snapper" <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:9asn84t5ulkl5p1d0nn9t2ck24h67bsd6t@yarwho.com ...
> Michael wrote...
>
>> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on the
>> intenet
>
> Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come out as
> one
> of these dickheads.
>
> And an obnoxious one at that.

You're just feeling a bit stung because you don't even know the basics of
the Privacy Act when it comes to accessing your wifes account
>

Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Snapper" <snapper1@y7mail.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:9asn84t5ulkl5p1d0nn9t2ck24h67bsd6t@yarwho.com ...
>> Michael wrote...
>>
>>> Its just a wank. Only dickheads care what others think of them on
>>> the intenet
>>
>> Hence your online "persona". However you try though, you still come
>> out as one
>> of these dickheads.
>>
>> And an obnoxious one at that.
>
> You're just feeling a bit stung because you don't even know the
> basics of the Privacy Act when it comes to accessing your wifes
> account

You wouldnt know what the privacy act requires if your pathetic excuse for a 'life'
depended on that, you stupid pig ignorant illiterate dunny cleaning fuckwit child.