Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > Australian Networks > aus.comms.mobile
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 12:29 PM
Alan Parkington
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

From
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10150938-94.html

If you're looking for a super fast wireless network, you might want to head
to Australia, where Telstra, the largest wireless operator Down Under, has
just launched an upgrade to its 3G wireless network that will offer peak
data rates of 21 Megabits per second.

Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak
performance. True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and
6.6 Mbps. But that is still way faster than other 3G cellular networks
around the world. In the U.S., most 3G cell phone users experience data
downloads closer to 400Kbps to 700Kbps.

Telstra has improved the performance of its network by upgrading its 3G
network, which uses a UMTS-based technology called HSPA or High Speed Packet
Access. Enhancements to this technology will boost download speeds to
enhance the mobile broadband user experience and enable a wide range of
services, like mobile TV.

AT&T in the U.S. has also used HSPA technology to build its 3G wireless
network. And like Telstra, it plans to increase the capacity of its wireless
network using upgrades to its existing network. Last May, Ralph de la Vega,
AT&T's mobility chief, said AT&T would be offering 20Mbps downloads over its
wireless network as soon as 2009.

I recently sat down with Telstra CEO Sol Trujillo to get the scoop on his
company's super fast network as well as to get some idea of where he sees
the wireless industry going in the future. Below is an edited version of our
conversation, as well as excerpts from an e-mail exchange following up our
conversation.

Q: Telstra claims it has the fastest cellular data network with downlink
transmission speeds up to 21 Mbps. How is the 3G network you've built
different from what people experience here in the U.S.?
Trujillo: Anyone can deploy anything on paper. And a lot of companies say
they have deployed HSPA. But if you go to Australia and use services, you
will get higher throughput wherever you go, no matter what city you are in
or if you're in the bush.

How were you able to do that?
Trujillo: Building a network is more than just ensuring there is a
connection between the device and the cell tower. There's also backhaul. And
the chipsets in devices need to be able to handle things like the one
button, one click to enable customers to get to a store. That is all part of
the experience. What is the difference between 14 Mbps and 21 Mbps? The 21
Mbps is more real time. It's all about the experience.

And how is the experience you've created in Australia different from what
people get here in the U.S. with 3G wireless networks?
Trujillo: We made a big bet to roll out a nationwide 3G network nationwide
to more than 2 million square kilometers in 10 months. We turned the whole
network up on one day. I got criticized when we announced we'd do this. NTT
had rolled out 3G and it was a big yawner. And the difference in ARPU
(average revenue per user) between 2G and 3G services for carriers in Europe
was only about 1 or 2 Euros. People weren't spending more money on the new
network. And people said, "Why the hell are you spending this kind of money
to build this network?" And I said, "Watch. We will create a new
experience."

The difference in ARPU for us between 2G and 3G is $20 a month. Over 50
percent of our subscribers are on the 3G network. In the U.S., the 3G
experience is spotty. It works well in some places. But if you commute, you
probably get dropped calls the whole ride to work. This is unacceptable,
especially when you are surfing the Web on your phone. You go to a Web site
and the connection drops. To reconnect you have to start all over. It's not
a pleasant experience. And people aren't going to spend money on a service
if they don't think it's worth it.

In Australia, people will spend money if they think they are getting a good
quality service. Our data pack consumers, the ones using a data card for
their laptops, are generating $90 per month in revenue per user. It's all
about the experience and making sure the service works where ever you are.
If you know you can count on it, you start using it more. If you aren't sure
whether it will work in some places, or if you think it will have slower
speeds, you won't use the service and you'll just wait until you get some
place where you know you'll have consistent service.

How much faster do you think you can scale this 3G network with current
technology?
Trujillo: We'll be able to take this HSPA Plus technology to 100 Mbps
between now and 2010 or 2011. But the determining factor will be how much
more bandwidth consumers really need. LTE is probably the next step for 4G
technology, but we haven't made any announcements yet. But 4G is a long way
off, probably not until 2015.

What is the plan in terms of rolling out the 21 Mbps service?
Trujillo: We went to 21 Mbps at the end of last year. And we're offering
wireless laptop data cards in the first quarter. We'll be announcing some
handsets in Barcelona at Mobile World Congress that can use the 21 Mbps
network. They will go on sale by the middle of this year.

What's the primary focus or strategy for Telstra?
Trujillo: We want to make communication easy. You have to make it about one
click. There are many phones and services out there that people don't use
because there are too many clicks to access them.

Do you think that Apple with its iPhone has done a good job in making it
easy to access new applications and surf the Internet from a cell phone?
Trujillo: Yes, they have done good job. But Telstra gives consumers that
plus choice. Apple has its view. Research In Motion has its view. And
Microsoft has its view. Our job is to give consumers choices, but also give
them the simplicity of that one-button, one-click experience. And we don't
offer this simplicity on just one phone. We offer it on all our phones,
including flip phones and slider phones. The button that says Big Pond or
Foxtel for cable TV is right there on the phone, so users can access the
broadband portal or watch TV right from their phones.

That brings up another interesting topic: Mobile TV. Foxtel is Telstra's
cable TV service, as you mentioned. Do you see a lot of subscribers
interested in watching TV on their phones?
Trujillo: People like snacking on mobile TV. They like to watch the news or
they watch a big breaking news event, like what was unfolding in Mumbai last
year. They want to find out what happened. And they want the latest news.
They also want the latest scores for the sports matches, or they're checking
the financial markets.

Here in the U.S., mobile TV hasn't yet taken off. What kind of uptake are
you seeing in Australia?
Trujillo: Right now, it's building. Phones with better screen resolution are
coming out and devices with better latency. One of the big things that Apple
did was optimize its software operating system to reduce latency so that
they could do a lot more with the phone in terms of video.

What kind of subscribership does Telstra have for Mobile TV?
Trujillo: I'd say that that a little under 5 percent of our Next G
subscribers are viewing TV on their phones. It is growing, but I don't think
it's going to be something that 50 percent of our subscribers will be doing
in the next five years. But I think we can get to between 15 and 20 percent
of our customer base to start watching TV. But when that happens it will be
significant. We make about $10 and $11 ARPU on TV watchers.

In the U.S., some carriers are charging $10 and $15 extra for mobile TV
service. And I think that might be slowing adoption. How do you think
pricing affects adoption?
Trujillo: Part of it is price. Part of it is billing. People also need to
know that it's available, and how they can use it. There's a whole learning
curve that goes on. We actually have used different pricing models. For the
Olympics, we sold packs for 15 days for $15.95 or $4.95 for one day. For
example, when Grant Hackett, the Australian swimmer, swam the 1500 meters,
we saw a huge spike in subscribers and usage. But typically it's about $10
or $11 per month on average for the TV service.

I think the real barrier to mobile TV adoption is that it needs to be
one-click access. If there are multiple clicks to get there, people won't
use it.

Google has talked a lot about its open platform for cell phones. And Verizon
Wireless has talked about making its wireless network more open. What is
Telstra's take on openness?
Trujillo: As carriers, we all have to enable features, services, and content
that people want to see. And we need to offer devices that people want to
use. So we have to create a process by which developers can enable new
applications and services in a quick, easy, reliable and secure way. But the
reality is that when something goes wrong with your phone or an application,
everyone points to the carrier.

So if I allow an infection in my network, you won't be happy as a consumer.
So you, the consumer, want us to make things reliable and secure. At the
same time, I also need to provide new and interesting applications. And
developers are thinking of 20 or more ideas a day. So we need to balance how
much we take in with also providing the proper filters. And we also don't
want to flood the customer with too much.

What do you think about Google's Android platform? Is Telstra going to
announce it will support an Android phone anytime soon?
Trujillo: We are looking at it. But the platform isn't at the stage where
it's really robust. We are looking at what's being said about it in the
blogosphere, and we're looking at testing it. But it's still in evolution
right now. It's very Google-centric. And there are limitations. We are
hopeful that it will be more open, because it offers a great alternative
operating platform. But it's not there today.

There were some reports recently that Telstra is interested in the new HTC
Android phone that is expected to be on the market later this year. Can you
share any thoughts with me on that?
Trujillo: I was very impressed by the array of new smartphones unveiled at
the Consumer Electronics Show. Handset manufacturers such as Palm, HTC, and
LG unveiled some great new products that focus on the features customers are
increasingly looking for in a phone, like one-touch access to their favorite
applications and services.

So is Telstra going to offer an Android phone?
Trujillo: At this stage, we have no announced plans. But we're looking at it
and having conversations. We won't be rolling it out tomorrow. The research
we've done suggests consumers want more simplicity and not more complexity.

Do you think that simplicity is missing in the U.S. market?
Trujillo: I think it's lacking everywhere. It's one of my passions to make
things simpler. When I think of myself as a user I have different needs as a
CEO when I am at work than when I am home as an average user. At home I'm
looking for more entertainment. And how I interact with my employees at work
is different from how I interact with my children at home. The key to this
market is understanding that people are multimodel and multi-environment.

What has happened is we have segmented the market by product. But what we
need to do is look at the market from a lifestyle perspective. That should
drive new products. And it should be simple.

So where does Telstra go from here?
Trujillo: We're looking to do more integration with our Big Pond content
engine, so that you can download a song that shows up on your laptop and
your phone. Integration of these services is the hard part. Our next G
network is IP and so is our fixed line broadband network, so we are
integrating features and services so they work across different platforms.
We want people to be able to get one bill and use the same service on
whatever device or platform they want whether it's at home or on the train.

How is the economic downturn affecting your business?
Trujillo: We are experiencing the downturn. But not like folks are here in
the U.S. Nowhere else seems to be feeling it like the U.S. is. But are there
economic pressures? Yes. Will some consumers look at trade-offs about what
services to keep and which ones to cut back on? The answer is possibly, yes.
But we think the wireless device has become essential. It's one of the three
things that people don't leave home without. Most people have become real
time. People want to send SMS messages or e-mail if they can't call. So far
we haven't seen usage change.

What about on the cable side? Do you think that as the crisis deepens people
will cut back on things like cable TV service?
Trujillo: The vast majority of people won't deny their whole family in-home
entertainment. In fact, they might spend more at home. Instead of going to
the movies, they will subscribe to HBO or whatever premium channel is
offered in Australia.

I've seen you pull out a couple of phones during the interview from your
pockets. How many phones do you actually own?
Trujillo: Well, let's see I have an iPhone, BlackBerry Bold, a Verizon LG
Voyager, Samsung touch screen, and a couple of others. I try them all in
different markets as I travel the world. I'm always testing networks. My job
is to study the markets. And watch how people use them. When I was on the
board of Pepsi, I watched and learned how people consumed Pepsi products.
I'm on the board of Target and I've learned about retailing. It's all about
the customer's experience. It's not about the network or the system the
service is delivered on. It's the customer.


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 04:26 PM
Polly the Parrot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:29:49 GMT, "Alan Parkington"
<patriot@iheartaustralia.com.au> wrote:

>Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak
>performance.


Of course.

>True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and
>6.6 Mbps


Of course not. More likely much less, as usual.

(rest of spam snipped)

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:03 PM
Marts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Alan Parkington wrote...

> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak
> performance. True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and
> 6.6 Mbps.


If you're looky...



Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:10 PM
Marts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Polly the Parrot wrote...

> >True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and
> >6.6 Mbps

>
> Of course not. More likely much less, as usual.


Dunno what speeds that they currently have running, but three NextG mobiles that
I own or owned were lucky to top out at 900 kbits/sec. Maybe the dedicated
modems are what they expect to achieve these speeds. Certainly, a Samsung A501
(150kbps), Palm Treo 750 (400 kbps) and a Motorola V9 (900 kbps) were either not
capable of these speeds or could not achieve such speeds due to network
limitations.

I s'pose it'd be like any wireless network, wouldn't it? I have a Netgear based
108 mbps "super g" wireless network at home. Despite the laptops connecting to
it at max speed, throughput is usually around a fifth of the rated connection.

Because of where I live I have a few friends who are on a local ISP's wireless
service. Typically they're on 512kb services, but you can tell it's subjected to
a fair bit of lag which impacts on browser performance.

When I use my V9 to browse the Bigpond site (free content) you can definately
tell that you're not on a fast connection. Either that or the mobile's
processing power isn't fast enough to allow quick rendering of the web pages.

Certainly, when it's connected as a modem to my laptop I make sure that what I
need to do is not data intensive because of speed and more significantly, cost.

But it's a backup and is usually only used as such.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 05:56 AM
Kwyjibo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Marts wrote:
> Polly the Parrot wrote...
>
>>> True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and
>>> 6.6 Mbps

>>
>> Of course not. More likely much less, as usual.

>
> Dunno what speeds that they currently have running, but three NextG
> mobiles that I own or owned were lucky to top out at 900 kbits/sec.


We know, and the reason has been explained to you a number of times - You
are technologically inept.


--
Kwyj.



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 07:59 AM
Rod Speed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Marts wrote:
> Alan Parkington wrote...


>> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak performance.
>> True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and 6.6 Mbps.


> If you're looky...


You one of those perverts ? Figures.



Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 11:38 AM
Horry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:56:06 +1100, Kwyjibo wrote:

> Marts wrote:
>> Polly the Parrot wrote...
>>
>>>> True download speeds will likely top out at between 4 Mbps and 6.6
>>>> Mbps
>>>
>>> Of course not. More likely much less, as usual.

>>
>> Dunno what speeds that they currently have running, but three NextG
>> mobiles that I own or owned were lucky to top out at 900 kbits/sec.

>
> We know, and the reason has been explained to you a number of times -
> You are technologically inept.


Exactly.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:51 AM
Marts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Horry wrote...

> > We know, and the reason has been explained to you a number of times -
> > You are technologically inept.

>
> Exactly.


Stop parroting your bum boy. It doesn't make you look any brighter, either.


Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2009, 06:45 AM
Rod Speed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Alan Poxington wrote

> From
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10150938-94.html


> If you're looking for a super fast wireless network, you might want to head to Australia,


Or you might not given what the *******s charge to use it.

> where Telstra, the largest wireless operator Down Under, has just launched an upgrade to its 3G wireless network
> that will offer peak data rates of 21 Megabits per second.


What matters is the average thruput and thats
nothing even remotely resembling anything like that.

> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak performance. True download speeds will likely top
> out at between 4 Mbps and 6.6 Mbps.


And you'll only see that if no one else is using it too.

> But that is still way faster than other 3G cellular networks
> around the world. In the U.S., most 3G cell phone users experience data downloads closer to 400Kbps to 700Kbps.


Same with NextG in practice.

> Telstra has improved the performance of its network by upgrading its 3G network, which uses a UMTS-based technology
> called HSPA or High Speed Packet Access. Enhancements to this technology will boost download speeds to enhance the
> mobile broadband user experience and enable a wide range of services, like mobile TV.


Pity about how much they gouge to use it.

> AT&T in the U.S. has also used HSPA technology to build its 3G
> wireless network. And like Telstra, it plans to increase the capacity
> of its wireless network using upgrades to its existing network.


Funny that.

> Last May, Ralph de la Vega, AT&T's mobility chief, said AT&T would be
> offering 20Mbps downloads over its wireless network as soon as 2009.


So much for the wog's stupid lie.

> I recently sat down with Telstra CEO Sol Trujillo to get the scoop on his company's super fast network as well as to
> get some idea of where he sees the wireless industry going in the future.


You'll have to pardon us if we dont actually cream our jeans on the spot.

> Below is an edited version of our conversation,


Most of your furious arse licking removed eh ?

> as well as excerpts from an e-mail exchange following up our conversation.


> Q: Telstra claims it has the fastest cellular data network with downlink transmission speeds up to 21 Mbps.


And that is clearly a lie.

> How is the 3G network you've built different from what people experience here in the U.S.?


What matters is what they also claim to be doing soon, stupid.

> Trujillo: Anyone can deploy anything on paper.


You clowns in spades wogboy.

> And a lot of companies say they have deployed HSPA. But if you go to Australia and use services, you will get higher
> throughput wherever you go, no matter what city you are in or if you're in the bush.


Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

> How were you able to do that?


By taking his dick in his hand, stupid.

> Trujillo: Building a network is more than just ensuring there is a connection between the device and the cell tower.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> There's also backhaul. And the chipsets in devices need to be able to handle things like the one button, one click to
> enable customers to get to a store. That is all part of the experience.


The furious wanking, actually.

> What is the difference between 14 Mbps and 21 Mbps?


7 Mbps, you stupid wog.

> The 21 Mbps is more real time. It's all about the experience.


The wank, actually.

> And how is the experience you've created in Australia different from what people get here in the U.S. with 3G wireless
> networks?


> Trujillo: We made a big bet to roll out a nationwide 3G network
> nationwide to more than 2 million square kilometers in 10 months. We turned the whole network up on one day.


Thats a lie. It keeps getting upgraded, liar.

> I got criticized when we announced we'd do this.


Only by irrelevant fools.

> NTT had rolled out 3G and it was a big yawner.


Yours was in spades.

> And the difference in ARPU (average revenue per user) between
> 2G and 3G services for carriers in Europe was only about 1 or 2
> Euros. People weren't spending more money on the new network.


They dont here either.

> And people said, "Why the hell are you spending this kind of money to
> build this network?" And I said, "Watch. We will create a new experience."


You lied.

> The difference in ARPU for us between 2G and 3G is $20 a month.


You're lying, as always.

> Over 50 percent of our subscribers are on the 3G network.


Thats because you gave them no choice when you turned the CDMA system off, ****wit.

> In the U.S., the 3G experience is spotty. It works well in some places. But if you commute, you probably get dropped
> calls the whole ride to work. This is unacceptable, especially when you are surfing the Web on your phone. You go to a
> Web site and the connection drops. To reconnect you have to start all over. It's not a pleasant experience.


> And people aren't going to spend money on a service if they don't think it's worth it.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> In Australia, people will spend money if they think they are getting a good quality service.


Depends on how much you gouge them.

> Our data pack consumers, the ones using a data card for their laptops, are generating $90 per month in revenue per
> user.


Because you gouge them so outrageously.

> It's all about the experience and making sure the service works where ever you are.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> If you know you can count on it, you start using it more.


Depends on how much arseholes like you gouge for it.

> If you aren't sure whether it will work in some places, or if you think it will have slower speeds, you won't use the
> service and you'll just wait until you get some place where you know you'll have consistent service.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> How much faster do you think you can scale this 3G network with current technology?


> Trujillo: We'll be able to take this HSPA Plus technology to 100 Mbps between now and 2010 or 2011.


Pity that what matters is the thruput.

> But the determining factor will be how much more bandwidth consumers really need. LTE is probably the next step for 4G
> technology, but we haven't made any announcements yet.
> But 4G is a long way off, probably not until 2015.


> What is the plan in terms of rolling out the 21 Mbps service?


> Trujillo: We went to 21 Mbps at the end of last year. And we're offering wireless laptop data cards in the first
> quarter. We'll be announcing some handsets in Barcelona at Mobile World Congress


Just an excuse for another jaunt. That fool McGauchie shouldnt allow it.

> that can use the 21 Mbps network. They will go on sale by the middle of this year.


> What's the primary focus or strategy for Telstra?


Getting rid of the stupid wog and McGauchie in spades.

> Trujillo: We want to make communication easy. You have to make it about one click.


Not even possible, wogboy.

> There are many phones and services out there that people don't use because there are too many clicks to access them.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> Do you think that Apple with its iPhone has done a good job in making it easy to access new applications and surf the
> Internet from a cell phone?


> Trujillo: Yes, they have done good job. But Telstra gives consumers that plus choice. Apple has its view. Research In
> Motion has its view. And Microsoft has its view. Our job is to give consumers choices, but also give them the
> simplicity of that one-button, one-click experience.


Not even possible, wogboy.

> And we don't offer this simplicity on just one phone. We offer it on all our phones, including flip phones and slider
> phones.


You're lying, as always.

> The button that says Big Pond or Foxtel for cable TV is right there on the phone, so users can access the
> broadband portal or watch TV right from their phones.


Pity about the rest.

> That brings up another interesting topic: Mobile TV. Foxtel is
> Telstra's cable TV service, as you mentioned. Do you see a lot of subscribers interested in watching TV on their
> phones?


> Trujillo: People like snacking on mobile TV. They like to watch the news or they watch a big breaking news event, like
> what was unfolding in Mumbai last year. They want to find out what happened. And they want the latest news. They also
> want the latest scores for the sports matches,


Pity about how much you gouge for that.

> or they're checking the financial markets.


Only a fool does that with mobile TV.

> Here in the U.S., mobile TV hasn't yet taken off. What kind of uptake are you seeing in Australia?


> Trujillo: Right now, it's building.


Which means **** all.

> Phones with better screen resolution are coming out and devices with better latency.


It would be a hell of a lot more surprising if they werent, wogboy.

> One of the big things that Apple did was optimize its software operating system to reduce latency so that they could
> do a lot more with the phone in terms of video.


Pity that its a steaming turd in so many other areas.

> What kind of subscribership does Telstra have for Mobile TV?


> Trujillo: I'd say that that a little under 5 percent of our Next G subscribers are viewing TV on their phones.


Bet its actually a hell of a lot less than that who pay for it.

> It is growing, but I don't think it's going to be something that 50 percent of our subscribers will be doing in the
> next five years.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> But I think we can get to between 15 and 20 percent of our customer base to start watching TV.


Then you are a fool.

> But when that happens it will be significant. We make about $10 and $11 ARPU on TV watchers.


Bet **** all of them are paying for that themselves.

> In the U.S., some carriers are charging $10 and $15 extra for mobile TV service. And I think that might be slowing
> adoption. How do you think pricing affects adoption?


> Trujillo: Part of it is price.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> Part of it is billing. People also need to know that it's available, and how they can use it.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> There's a whole learning curve that goes on.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> We actually have used different pricing models. For the Olympics, we sold packs for 15 days for $15.95 or $4.95 for
> one day. For example, when Grant Hackett, the Australian swimmer, swam the 1500 meters, we saw a huge spike in
> subscribers and usage. But typically it's about $10 or $11 per month on average for the TV service.


Wota ****ing ripoff.

> I think the real barrier to mobile TV adoption is that it needs to be one-click access.


Not even possible you stupid wog.

> If there are multiple clicks to get there, people won't use it.


Pity its not even possible you stupid wog.

> Google has talked a lot about its open platform for cell phones. And Verizon Wireless has talked about making its
> wireless network more open. What is Telstra's take on openness?


> Trujillo: As carriers, we all have to enable features, services, and content that people want to see.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> And we need to offer devices that people want to use.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> So we have to create a process by which developers can enable new applications and services in a quick, easy, reliable
> and secure way. But the reality is that when something goes wrong with your phone or an application, everyone points
> to the carrier.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> So if I allow an infection in my network, you won't be happy as a consumer.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> So you, the consumer, want us to make things reliable and secure.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> At the same time, I also need to provide new and interesting applications. And developers are thinking of 20 or more
> ideas a day.


Wota ****ing ******...

> So we need to balance how much we take in with also providing the
> proper filters. And we also don't want to flood the customer with too much.


> What do you think about Google's Android platform? Is Telstra going to announce it will support an Android phone
> anytime soon?


> Trujillo: We are looking at it. But the platform isn't at the stage
> where it's really robust. We are looking at what's being said about it in the blogosphere,


Wota ****ing ******...

> and we're looking at testing it.


Just dont lose it this time, stupid.

> But it's still in evolution right now. It's very Google-centric. And there are limitations. We are hopeful that it
> will be more open, because it offers a great alternative operating platform. But it's not there today.


> There were some reports recently that Telstra is interested in the
> new HTC Android phone that is expected to be on the market later this year. Can you share any thoughts with me on
> that?


> Trujillo: I was very impressed by the array of new smartphones
> unveiled at the Consumer Electronics Show. Handset manufacturers such
> as Palm, HTC, and LG unveiled some great new products that focus on
> the features customers are increasingly looking for in a phone, like
> one-touch access to their favorite applications and services.


> So is Telstra going to offer an Android phone?


> Trujillo: At this stage, we have no announced plans. But we're looking at it and having conversations.


Wota ****ing ******...

> We won't be rolling it out tomorrow. The research we've done suggests consumers want more simplicity and not more
> complexity.


> Do you think that simplicity is missing in the U.S. market?


> Trujillo: I think it's lacking everywhere. It's one of my passions to make things simpler. When I think of myself as a
> user I have different needs as a CEO when I am at work than when I am home as an average user.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> At home I'm looking for more entertainment.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> And how I interact with my employees at work is different from how I interact with my children at home.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> The key to this market is understanding that people are multimodel and multi-environment.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> What has happened is we have segmented the market by product. But what we need to do is look at the market from a
> lifestyle
> perspective. That should drive new products. And it should be simple.


> So where does Telstra go from here?


Straight down the tubes now that Labor is about to break it up.

> Trujillo: We're looking to do more integration with our Big Pond
> content engine, so that you can download a song that shows up on your laptop and your phone.


****, is this where we're all supposed to cream our jeans or sumfin ?

> Integration of these services is the hard part. Our next G network is IP and so is our fixed line broadband network,
> so we are integrating features and services so they work across different platforms.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> We want people to be able to get one bill and use the same service on whatever device or platform they want whether
> it's at home or on the train.


No train here, wogboy.

> How is the economic downturn affecting your business?


Its what has flushed the wog back where it came from.

> Trujillo: We are experiencing the downturn.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> But not like folks are here in the U.S.


What the **** are you doing over there ?

> Nowhere else seems to be feeling it like the U.S. is.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> But are there economic pressures? Yes. Will some consumers look at trade-offs about what services to keep and which
> ones to cut back on? The answer is possibly, yes.


Corse they will, you stupid wog.

> But we think the wireless device has become essential.


Pigs arse it has.

> It's one of the three things that people don't leave home without.


Wrong, as always.

> Most people have become real time.


Wota ****ing ******...

> People want to send SMS messages or e-mail if they can't call.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> So far we haven't seen usage change.


**** all have been sacked yet, stupid.

> What about on the cable side? Do you think that as the crisis deepens people will cut back on things like cable TV
> service?


> Trujillo: The vast majority of people won't deny their whole family in-home entertainment.


They can always use the free to air, ****wit.

> In fact, they might spend more at home.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> Instead of going to the movies, they will subscribe to HBO or whatever premium channel is offered in Australia.


Bet **** all of them do.

> I've seen you pull out a couple of phones during the interview from your pockets.


Better than from his arse, stupid.

> How many phones do you actually own?


None of them, Telstra owns them, stupid.

> Trujillo: Well, let's see I have an iPhone, BlackBerry Bold, a
> Verizon LG Voyager, Samsung touch screen, and a couple of others. I try them all in different markets as I travel the
> world. I'm always testing networks. My job is to study the markets.


Like hell it is.

> And watch how people use them.


Like hell it is.

> When I was on the board of Pepsi, I watched and
> learned how people consumed Pepsi products.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.

> I'm on the board of Target and I've learned about retailing.


Sweet **** all, actually.

> It's all about the customer's experience. It's not about the network or the system the service is delivered on. It's
> the customer.


Must be one of those rocket scientist wog farts.



Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 03:07 AM
Kwyjibo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Rod Speed wrote:
> Alan Poxington wrote
>
>> From
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10150938-94.html

>
>> If you're looking for a super fast wireless network, you might want
>> to head to Australia,

>
> Or you might not given what the *******s charge to use it.
>
>> where Telstra, the largest wireless operator Down Under, has just
>> launched an upgrade to its 3G wireless network that will offer peak data
>> rates of 21 Megabits per second.

>
> What matters is the average thruput and thats
> nothing even remotely resembling anything like that.
>
>> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak
>> performance. True download speeds will likely top out at between 4
>> Mbps and 6.6 Mbps.

>
> And you'll only see that if no one else is using it too.
>
>> But that is still way faster than other 3G cellular networks
>> around the world. In the U.S., most 3G cell phone users experience
>> data downloads closer to 400Kbps to 700Kbps.

>
> Same with NextG in practice.


Dunno about that. I regularly see 300kBps (that's kilo*bytes*) on my NextG
service.

--
Kwyj.



Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:45 AM
Horry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:07:52 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:

> Rod Speed wrote:
>> Alan Poxington wrote
>>
>>> From
>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10150938-94.html

>>
>>> If you're looking for a super fast wireless network, you might want to
>>> head to Australia,

>>
>> Or you might not given what the *******s charge to use it.
>>
>>> where Telstra, the largest wireless operator Down Under, has just
>>> launched an upgrade to its 3G wireless network that will offer peak
>>> data rates of 21 Megabits per second.

>>
>> What matters is the average thruput and thats nothing even remotely
>> resembling anything like that.
>>
>>> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at peak
>>> performance. True download speeds will likely top out at between 4
>>> Mbps and 6.6 Mbps.

>>
>> And you'll only see that if no one else is using it too.
>>
>>> But that is still way faster than other 3G cellular networks around
>>> the world. In the U.S., most 3G cell phone users experience data
>>> downloads closer to 400Kbps to 700Kbps.

>>
>> Same with NextG in practice.

>
> Dunno about that. I regularly see 300kBps (that's kilo*bytes*) on my
> NextG service.


Hello Martin Taylor.

Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:05 AM
Rod Speed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Telstra CEO dishes on superfast wireless

Horry wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:07:52 +1000, Kwyjibo wrote:
>
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Alan Poxington wrote
>>>
>>>> From
>>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10150938-94.html
>>>
>>>> If you're looking for a super fast wireless network, you might
>>>> want to head to Australia,
>>>
>>> Or you might not given what the *******s charge to use it.
>>>
>>>> where Telstra, the largest wireless operator Down Under, has just
>>>> launched an upgrade to its 3G wireless network that will offer peak
>>>> data rates of 21 Megabits per second.
>>>
>>> What matters is the average thruput and thats nothing even remotely
>>> resembling anything like that.
>>>
>>>> Of course, the 21 Mbps downlink speed is a theoretical speed at
>>>> peak performance. True download speeds will likely top out at
>>>> between 4 Mbps and 6.6 Mbps.
>>>
>>> And you'll only see that if no one else is using it too.
>>>
>>>> But that is still way faster than other 3G cellular networks around
>>>> the world. In the U.S., most 3G cell phone users experience data
>>>> downloads closer to 400Kbps to 700Kbps.
>>>
>>> Same with NextG in practice.

>>
>> Dunno about that. I regularly see 300kBps (that's kilo*bytes*) on my
>> NextG service.

>
> Hello Martin Taylor.


Makes more sense to wave him goodbye.



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Repeater, Access Point, Laptop Triangle of Death (Please Help) TheKingsCrown Network Troubleshooting 11 09-01-2010 09:59 AM
Burgess dishes what's up with Telstra Alan Parkington aus.comms.mobile 3 09-13-2008 08:23 AM
Telstra fights rural broadband deal Alan Parkington aus.comms.mobile 13 01-19-2008 06:33 PM
Re: HP wireless assistant issues Jeff Liebermann alt.internet.wireless 2 12-25-2007 01:46 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45