Telstra chairman hits back at Optus

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>
>> ...
>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>
>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>
>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>
> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed, fuckwit.
>
> And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.
>
>

What is FTTN, fwit? Exactly.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:fvukcd$br2$3@aioe.org...
>>>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal
>>>>>>> to cover 98% of the population.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to
>>>>>>> keep up.
>>>>>> WTF?
>>>>>> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's logical, you idiot.
>>>> Hmmm. I guess you CAN be that stupid.......
>>>> Poor cunt.
>>>>
>>> Why don't you explain it kwik boy?
>>
>> Because it would make more sense to try to explain it to a stone, fuckwit.
>
> No no no. You're speedy, the other fwit is kwik boy

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>
>>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.
>>
>>>> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.
>>
>>>> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.
>>
>>> No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit
>>
>> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never
>> ever had a fucking clue. There is no FTTN in the sense that Telstra is spruiking it
>> currently, fuckwit.

> (speedy starts to get an inkling that's he's dug himself a hole)

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do
>>>>>>> you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>
>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.

> What is FTTN, fwit?

Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.

> Exactly.

Nope.

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvuvt4$p58$4@aioe.org...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fvul03$onu$1@aioe.org...
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>>
>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>> Who mentioned CBD's, fuckwit?
>>
>
> Who asked you, moron?

You were replying to me when you stupidly tried to introduce "CBD" into the
discussion, fuckwit.
Learn to follow a thread.

--
Kwyj.

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.
>
>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>
> Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.

Sure, so educate me.
Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?

C'mon speedy, you should know - here's your chance to tell Australia.

>
>> Exactly.
>
> Nope.
>
>

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote

>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),

>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.

>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.

>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?

>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.

>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.

>>> What is FTTN, fwit?

>> Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.

> Sure, so educate me.

Not even possible.

> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?

None of the above.

> C'mon speedy, you should know

I do indeed.

> - here's your chance to tell Australia.

No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.

>>> Exactly.

>> Nope.

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>
>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>
>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>
>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>
>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>
>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>
>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.
>
>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>
>>> Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.
>
>> Sure, so educate me.
>
> Not even possible.
>
>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
>
> None of the above.

I thought so - pathetic

>
>> C'mon speedy, you should know
>
> I do indeed.

No evidence of that

>
>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>
> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>
>>>> Exactly.
>
>>> Nope.
>
>

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:g06mav$jp$1@aioe.org...
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>
>>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>
>>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>
>>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>
>>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>
>>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.
>>
>>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>>
>>>> Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.
>>
>>> Sure, so educate me.
>>
>> Not even possible.
>>
>>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
>>
>> None of the above.
>
> I thought so - pathetic
>
>>
>>> C'mon speedy, you should know
>>
>> I do indeed.
>
> No evidence of that
>
>>
>>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>>
>> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>>
>>>>> Exactly.
>>
>>>> Nope.
>>

I think that Roddles needs to do us all a favour and self-immolate.

If you are not up to it Roddles, I'm sure I could drum up a few volunteers
to assist you.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote

>>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),

>>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.

>>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.

>>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?

>>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.

>>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>>> fuckwit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.

>>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?

>>>> Something you clearly dont have a fucking clue about, fuckwit.

>>> Sure, so educate me.

>> Not even possible.

>>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?

>> None of the above.

> I thought so

Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog shit isnt even capable of thought.

> - pathetic

Your sig is supposed to be at the bottom with a --- on a line by itself in front of it, fuckwit.

>>> C'mon speedy, you should know

>> I do indeed.

> No evidence of that

You wouldnt know what evidence was if it bit you on your lard arse, fuckwit.

>>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.

>> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.

>>>>> Exactly.

>>>> Nope.