Telstra chairman hits back at Optus

From
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9
consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband network,
declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

In an exclusive KGB Interrogation, Mr McGauchie told Alan Kohler, Robert
Gottliebsen and Stephen Bartholomeusz that Telstra was the only company that
could build and operate the high tech fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network.

"No one else can do it in the way we are capable of doing it," Mr McGauchie
said.

"I can't imagine that the Government would want to go down a path with
someone who was not capable of delivering."

Earlier in the week, Optus Chief Paul O'Sullivan said his Optus-led G9
consortium would bid to build the network, but was unhappy at the Federal
Government's decision not to extend the deadline of July 25.

In a wide-ranging interview, Mr McGauchie categorically ruled out bidding
for the network if structural separation was imposed as a condition of the
tender.

"Structural separation is frankly really dangerous in what it does to a
system.

"Not only would it be unattractive to us, but it would be incredibly
damaging to Australia," he said.

Structural separation would lead to the break-up of Telstra's retail and
wholesale divisions, a move floated by Labor during its time in opposition.

However, McGauchie was coy when discussing his views on the Rudd Labor
government.

"The new government has a view as to what they want out of
telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with that," Mr
McGauchie said.

"Alan Parkington" <patriot@iheartaustralia.com.au> wrote in message
news:FShTj.7510$ko5.5155@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> From
> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>
> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9
> consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband network,
> declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>
> In an exclusive KGB Interrogation, Mr McGauchie told Alan Kohler, Robert
> Gottliebsen and Stephen Bartholomeusz that Telstra was the only company
> that could build and operate the high tech fibre-to-the-node (FTTN)
> network.
>
> "No one else can do it in the way we are capable of doing it," Mr
> McGauchie said.
>
> "I can't imagine that the Government would want to go down a path with
> someone who was not capable of delivering."
>
> Earlier in the week, Optus Chief Paul O'Sullivan said his Optus-led G9
> consortium would bid to build the network, but was unhappy at the Federal
> Government's decision not to extend the deadline of July 25.
>
> In a wide-ranging interview, Mr McGauchie categorically ruled out bidding
> for the network if structural separation was imposed as a condition of the
> tender.
>
> "Structural separation is frankly really dangerous in what it does to a
> system.
>
> "Not only would it be unattractive to us, but it would be incredibly
> damaging to Australia," he said.

Pity that Telstra won;t have a say in it

>
> Structural separation would lead to the break-up of Telstra's retail and
> wholesale divisions, a move floated by Labor during its time in
> opposition.
>
> However, McGauchie was coy when discussing his views on the Rudd Labor
> government.
>
> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with that," Mr
> McGauchie said.
>


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Alan Parkington <patriot@iheartaustralia.com.au> wrote:

> From
> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the
> national broadband
> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

Wota surprise.

> In an exclusive KGB Interrogation, Mr McGauchie told Alan Kohler, Robert Gottliebsen and Stephen Bartholomeusz that
> Telstra was the only company that could build and operate the high tech fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network.

Clearly a pathological liar.

> "No one else can do it in the way we are capable of doing it," Mr McGauchie said.

No one else can rape the customers like Telstra can. He did get that bit right.

> "I can't imagine that the Government would want to go down a path with someone who was not capable of delivering."

Could that be because you clowns arent prepared to do it the way
the govt wants it done ? Same reason you lost the Opel contract.

> Earlier in the week, Optus Chief Paul O'Sullivan said his Optus-led G9 consortium would bid to build the network, but
> was unhappy at the
> Federal Government's decision not to extend the deadline of July 25.

Because telstra has refused to provide the vital info thats necessary
to do a viable bid until a day or so before the deadline.

If the new govt lets telstra get away with that, they deserve a right royal boot in the arse.

> In a wide-ranging interview, Mr McGauchie categorically ruled out bidding for the network if structural separation was
> imposed as a condition of the tender.

Great. If the govt has a clue, they will require that, and fuck
telstra over just like was done with the Opel contract too.

> "Structural separation is frankly really dangerous in what it does to a system.

Fine, then you wont get the $4.7B.

> "Not only would it be unattractive to us, but it would be incredibly damaging to Australia," he said.

Nothing like as damaging to Australia as you have been, arsehole.

> Structural separation would lead to the break-up of Telstra's retail and wholesale divisions, a move floated by Labor
> during its time in opposition.

And with any luck they'll fuck over telstra and you clowns will miss out on the $4.7B

With any luck the new govt will be able to use that as an excuse to keep the $4.7B and
wont be spending to that to give Murdoch what he should be paying for if he wants it.

> However, McGauchie was coy when discussing his views on the Rudd Labor government.

> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
> that," Mr McGauchie said.

Clearly a pathological liar. Cant even manage a consistent line of bullshit in a single interview.

Alan Parkington wrote:
> From
> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>
>
> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9
> consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband
> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

Telstra is planning to start in the cities. The government wants
broadband in the bush. It's good business to pay attention to your
biggest customer - one would have thought


>
....
>
> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with that," Mr
> McGauchie said.
>

Huh?

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Alan Parkington wrote

>> From
>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the
>> national broadband
>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

So is labor.

> The government wants broadband in the bush.

That govt has gone, stupid.

> It's good business to pay attention to your
> biggest customer - one would have thought

Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>> that," Mr McGauchie said.

> Huh?

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Alan Parkington wrote
>
>>> From
>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>
>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the
>>> national broadband
>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>
>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>
> So is labor.
>
>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>
> That govt has gone, stupid.

The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?


>
>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>> biggest customer - one would have thought
>
> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but
neither can you

>
>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>>> that," Mr McGauchie said.
>
>> Huh?
>
>

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Alan Parkington wrote

>>>> From
>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed
>>>> G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband
>>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

>> So is labor.

>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.

>> That govt has gone, stupid.

> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,

So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.

> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?

They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.

>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>> biggest customer - one would have thought

>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you

You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.

And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.

>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work
>>>> with that," Mr McGauchie said.

>>> Huh?

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Alan Parkington wrote
>
>>>>> From
>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>
>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed
>>>>> G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband
>>>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>
>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>
>>> So is labor.
>
>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>
>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>
>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,
>
> So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.
>
>> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>
> They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.
>

And when do you suppose they will end?

Not even Labor would fall for that one, speedy boy...


>>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>>> biggest customer - one would have thought
>
>>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.
>
>> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you
>
> You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.
>
> And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.

....but apparently you would

>
>>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work
>>>>> with that," Mr McGauchie said.
>
>>>> Huh?
>
>

On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:

> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Alan Parkington wrote
>>
>>>> From
>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>>
>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the
>>>> national broadband
>>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>>
>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>>
>> So is labor.
>>
>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>
>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>
> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?

By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote

>>>>>> From
>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed
>>>>>> G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the national
>>>>>> broadband network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

>>>> So is labor.

>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.

>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.

>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,

>> So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.

>>> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?

>> They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.

> And when do you suppose they will end?

Well after they start, fuckwit.

>>>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>>>> biggest customer - one would have thought

>>>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

>>> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you

>> You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.

>> And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.

> ...but apparently you would

Nope, its never going to be feasible or sensible to deliver FTTN everywhere, fuckwit.

>>>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
>>>>>> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>>>>>> that," Mr McGauchie said.

>>>>> Huh?

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote
>
>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>
>>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed
>>>>>>> G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the national
>>>>>>> broadband network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>
>>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>
>>>>> So is labor.
>
>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>
>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>
>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,
>
>>> So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.
>
>>>> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>
>>> They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.
>
>> And when do you suppose they will end?
>
> Well after they start, fuckwit.
>
>>>>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>>>>> biggest customer - one would have thought
>
>>>>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.
>
>>>> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you
>
>>> You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.
>
>>> And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.
>
>> ...but apparently you would
>
> Nope, its never going to be feasible or sensible to deliver FTTN everywhere, fuckwit.

I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
98% of the population.

That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.

>
>>>>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
>>>>>>> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>>>>>>> that," Mr McGauchie said.
>
>>>>>> Huh?
>
>

Horry wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Alan Parkington wrote
>>>>> From
>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building the
>>>>> national broadband
>>>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>>> So is labor.
>>>
>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>
> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>
>

The cities already have broadband (mostly), so starting there will just
delay the whole process. Maybe that's the aim.

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...

> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
> 98% of the population.
>
> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.
>

WTF?
Surely you can't be THAT stupid??

--
Kwyj.

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
> Horry wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote
>>>>>> From
>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument
>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9
>>>>>> consortium's renewed interest in building the national broadband
>>>>>> network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.
>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.
>>>> So is labor.
>>>>
>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>
>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>
>>
>
> The cities already have broadband (mostly),

They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.

> so starting there will just delay the whole process.

You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?

--
Kwyj.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote

>>>>>>>> From
>>>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>>>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building
>>>>>>>> the national broadband network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

>>>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

>>>>>> So is labor.

>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.

>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.

>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage,

>>>> So it clearly wants a hell of a lot more than broadband in the bush, fuckwit.

>>>>> how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?

>>>> They START in the citys and end up doing the bush as well, fuckwit.

>>> And when do you suppose they will end?

>> Well after they start, fuckwit.

>>>>>>> It's good business to pay attention to your
>>>>>>> biggest customer - one would have thought

>>>>>> Only when you noticed that the govt has changed.

>>>>> Well of course its entirely possible that Labor can't do arithmetic but neither can you

>>>> You in spades. 98% is a hell of a lot more than JUST the bush, fuckwit.

>>>> And the real bush is the 2% that isnt even covered, fuckwit.

>>> ...but apparently you would

>> Nope, its never going to be feasible or sensible to deliver FTTN everywhere, fuckwit.

> I never commented on the feasibility

You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant.

What you may or may not have commented on in spades, fuckwit.

That was a comment on that terminal stupidity of yours, 'but apparently you would', fuckwit.

> it is Labor's goal to cover 98% of the population.

You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist terminal fuckwits ?

> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.

You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.

No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.

>>>>>>>> "The new government has a view as to what they want out of
>>>>>>>> telecommunications and we'll do our very best to work with
>>>>>>>> that," Mr McGauchie said.

>>>>>>> Huh?

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Horry wrote
>> B J Foster wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> Alan Parkington wrote

>>>>>> From
>>>>>> http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...D?OpenDocument

>>>>>> Telstra Chairman Donald McGauchie has hit out at the Optus-backed G9 consortium's renewed interest in building
>>>>>> the national broadband network, declaring Telstra the only viable bidder.

>>>>> Telstra is planning to start in the cities.

>>>> So is labor.

>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.

>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.

>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the
>>> cities?

>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?

> The cities already have broadband (mostly),

So does the bush, fuckwit.

> so starting there will just delay the whole process.

That process is FTTN, not just broadband, which almost everyone already has, fuckwit.

> Maybe that's the aim.

Wota terminal fuckwit.

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>
>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
>> 98% of the population.
>>
>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.
>>
>
> WTF?
> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>

It's logical, you idiot.

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>> Horry wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>
....
>>>>>
>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>
>>>
>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>
> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>
>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>
> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>

The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
....
>
>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.
>
> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.
>
> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.
>

No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvulks$uk5$1@aioe.org...
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> ...
>>
>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.
>>
>> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.
>>
>> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.
>>
>
> No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit

So you don't even know what FTTN is then.

--
Kwyj.

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvukcd$br2$3@aioe.org...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>>
>>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
>>> 98% of the population.
>>>
>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.
>>>
>>
>> WTF?
>> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>>
>
> It's logical, you idiot.

Hmmm. I guess you CAN be that stupid.......
Poor cunt.

--
Kwyj.

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvul03$onu$1@aioe.org...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>> Horry wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>
> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>
>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>
>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>
>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>
>
> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.

Who mentioned CBD's, fuckwit?

--
Kwyj.

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvukcd$br2$3@aioe.org...
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>>>
>>>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to cover
>>>> 98% of the population.
>>>>
>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to keep up.
>>>>
>>> WTF?
>>> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>>>
>> It's logical, you idiot.
>
> Hmmm. I guess you CAN be that stupid.......
> Poor cunt.
>

Why don't you explain it kwik boy?

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvulks$uk5$1@aioe.org...
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> ...
>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.
>>> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.
>>>
>>> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.
>>>
>> No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit
>
> So you don't even know what FTTN is then.
>

What is it?

Kwyjibo wrote:
> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fvul03$onu$1@aioe.org...
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>
>> ...
>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>
>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>
>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>
> Who mentioned CBD's, fuckwit?
>

Who asked you, moron?

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fvpckh$5i1$3@aioe.org...
>>> Horry wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>
> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>
>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>
>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>
>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?

> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.

The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed, fuckwit.

And they dont have FTTN already anyway, fuckwit.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote

>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.

>> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.

>> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.

> No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever had a fucking clue.

There is no FTTN in the sense that Telstra is spruiking it currently, fuckwit.

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fvukcd$br2$3@aioe.org...
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to
>>>>> cover 98% of the population.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to
>>>>> keep up.
>>>> WTF?
>>>> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>>>>
>>> It's logical, you idiot.
>>
>> Hmmm. I guess you CAN be that stupid.......
>> Poor cunt.
>>
>
> Why don't you explain it kwik boy?

Because it would make more sense to try to explain it to a stone, fuckwit.

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:fvukcd$br2$3@aioe.org...
>>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>>> "B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fvpcgm$5i1$2@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I never commented on the feasibility, twit, it is Labor's goal to
>>>>>> cover 98% of the population.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city. Try to
>>>>>> keep up.
>>>>> WTF?
>>>>> Surely you can't be THAT stupid??
>>>>>
>>>> It's logical, you idiot.
>>> Hmmm. I guess you CAN be that stupid.......
>>> Poor cunt.
>>>
>> Why don't you explain it kwik boy?
>
> Because it would make more sense to try to explain it to a stone, fuckwit.
>
>

No no no. You're speedy, the other fwit is kwik boy

Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>
>>>> That's going to take longer if they start in the city.
>
>>> You have to start somewhere, fuckwit.
>
>>> No point in starting where most people aint, fuckwit.
>
>> No point is starting where FTTN already *is* fuckwit
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever had a fucking clue.
>
> There is no FTTN in the sense that Telstra is spruiking it currently, fuckwit.
>
>

(speedy starts to get an inkling that's he's dug himself a hole)