Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G

Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown on
Telstra website as being $299 (up from $149):

http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:

> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown on Telstra website as being $299 (up from
> $149):

> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm

Hardly surprising given that they were forced to delay the cdma shutdown
and the delay wont change even if more change away from cdma now.

thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:

> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown on Telstra website as being $299 (up from
> $149):

> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm

Still being advertised in my paper for $149.

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:22:06 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

> thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown on Telstra website as being $299 (up from
>> $149):
>
>> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm
>
> Still being advertised in my paper for $149.

And still being advertised on Telstra's website for $149

http://shop.telstra.com/webapp/wcs/s...&SMIDENTITY=NO

Plus the link given by thegoons says $149 too (the Flash animation).

WTF is thegoons on about?

"Horry" <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1cva4u0y58lgf$.cd2v6ij0gx5a$.dlg@40tude.net.. .
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:22:06 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown
>>> on Telstra website as being $299 (up from
>>> $149):
>>
>>> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm
>>
>> Still being advertised in my paper for $149.
>
> And still being advertised on Telstra's website for $149
>
> http://shop.telstra.com/webapp/wcs/s...&SMIDENTITY=NO
>
> Plus the link given by thegoons says $149 too (the Flash animation).
>
> WTF is thegoons on about?

it said $299 for a few days until i wrote to the editor of the propoganda
website NWAT and they corrected it

However, it still says it's a 'GSM' handset. The LG-Shine handset pages show
the NEXT-G logo beside them too. Telstra, totally useless



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:10:06 +1100, thegoons wrote:

> "Horry" <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1cva4u0y58lgf$.cd2v6ij0gx5a$.dlg@40tude.net.. .
>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:22:06 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>> thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411 now shown
>>>> on Telstra website as being $299 (up from
>>>> $149):
>>>
>>>> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm
>>>
>>> Still being advertised in my paper for $149.
>>
>> And still being advertised on Telstra's website for $149
>>
>> http://shop.telstra.com/webapp/wcs/s...&SMIDENTITY=NO
>>
>> Plus the link given by thegoons says $149 too (the Flash animation).
>>
>> WTF is thegoons on about?
>
> it said $299 for a few days until i wrote to the editor of the propoganda
> website NWAT and they corrected it

That explains it then. Incidentally, about six weeks ago I wrote to the
editor of the propaganda website "Tell The Truth Telstra" to point out an
error and they completely ignored me. (It doesn't look like they're
updating that site anymore, anyway.)


> However, it still says it's a 'GSM' handset. The LG-Shine handset pages show
> the NEXT-G logo beside them too. Telstra, totally useless

The Shine IS a Next-G handset, isn't it?

Horry <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote

>>> Telstra snubs those slow to transfer to NEXT-G - Samsung A411
>>> now shown on Telstra website as being $299 (up from $149):

>>> http://www.telstra.com.au/telstrapre...msung_a411.htm

>> Still being advertised in my paper for $149.

> And still being advertised on Telstra's website for $149

> http://shop.telstra.com/webapp/wcs/s...&SMIDENTITY=NO

> Plus the link given by thegoons says $149 too (the Flash animation).

> WTF is thegoons on about?

I didnt look at his link when it first showed up, and havent even looked at it now.

Maybe they fucked up and fixed the fuckup later or sumfin.

Or maybe the goon with multiple 'personalitys' fucked up, as always.

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:642hpkF29ser8U1@mid.individual.net...
> Horry <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>
> Or maybe the goon with multiple 'personalitys' fucked up, as always.
spelling:'personalities' - Rod Speed, wrong again as always. Let me guess
what the reply will be 'can't even manage it's own lines'???



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:642hpkF29ser8U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Horry <horacewachope@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>
>> Or maybe the goon with multiple 'personalitys' fucked up, as always.
> spelling:'personalities' - Rod Speed, wrong again as always. Let me
> guess what the reply will be 'can't even manage it's own lines'???

Guess again, fuckwit.

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:19:51 +1100 "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> > spelling:'personalities' - Rod Speed, wrong again as always. Let me
> > guess what the reply will be 'can't even manage it's own lines'???
>
> Guess again, fuckwit.


Geez Roddles, please don't keep us in suspense!

John Phillips <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:19:51 +1100 "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> spelling:'personalities' - Rod Speed, wrong again as always. Let me
>>> guess what the reply will be 'can't even manage it's own lines'???
>>
>> Guess again, fuckwit.
>
>
> Geez Roddles, please don't keep us in suspense!

In your case, suspense by the neck with a decent rope is the only thing that makes any sense.

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:05:35 +1100 "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> In your case, suspense by the neck with a decent rope is the only
> thing that makes any sense.
>
I love it when you talk dirty!