"Will Kemp" <Will@xxxx.Swaggie.net> wrote in message
news:4709fb88$0$23787$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> Opel's service will be along
> in a few months anyway - and it will be better than satellite.
Pffffft!
This "Opel" doesn't exist. No CEO, no staff, they don't even have a carrier
licence!
Their coverage maps are a joke, just a series of circles drawn around 10 and
20 cent coins, they take in to account none of the gegraphical features of
the land and are just complete fantasy.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>> James Bell wrote:
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a month
>>>
>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>
>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify ANY
>>> service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>
>>> ROFL.
>>>
>>> LUDICROUS.
>>
>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices then
>> build your own network or wait a long time before a competitor bothers
>> to build a network with adequate coverage.
>
> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you tho.
I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface. This is a
"company" that doesn't exist. There's no CEO, no staff, no premises, they
don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of Australia
unless Optus gets the billion bucks was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe
not so far from the truth given the woeful performance of Optus compared to
other off-shore SingTel concerns. Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan
will sidle up again and say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's
going to fail and you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up
another billion; and another."
mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>> month
>>>>
>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>>
>>>> ROFL.
>>>>
>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>
>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices then
>>> build your own network or wait a long time before a competitor
>>> bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>
>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you tho.
> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
More fool you.
> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
It will.
> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
There will be.
> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in bids, fuckwit.
Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth given the woeful performance of
> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's
> going to fail and you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another billion; and another."
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when it
flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to give
telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly deserves.
I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still wetting its pants laughing.
mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
> "James Bell" <jamesbell@tellthetruthtelstra.com.au> wrote in message
> news:470b3f88$0$23833$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> Michael wrote:
>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a month
>>
>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>
>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify ANY
>> service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>
>> ROFL.
>>
>> LUDICROUS.
>
>
> Depends. Mobile data, no probs at all, I'd pay for the convenience
> and the speed. I certainly wouldn't be using it as my primary
> internet service. If I was, I'd be on ADSL or, if that wasn't
> available, the 3G plan @ $149 isn't unreasonable given that, if I did
> live where there wasn't ADSL, there's probably a really good reason
> why I chose to live there. I think that's what we miss when we talk
> about this subject. We talk as though internet access fast and cheap
> is our reason for living. Well, if it is, move to where you can get
> it. A major regional town, a cap city, the US of fucking A, if that's
> your baby. If it's NOT important enough for you to move for, then
> stop whining because you are where you want to be for whatever reason
> is most important to you.
> Australia's a real twat for Telcos. Massive space, virtually zero
> population. When a suburb of Islamabad has 7 million people and can be
> covered with 5 base stations, you can see why SingTel and the others
> don't want to throw a cent the way of Australia.
Have fun explaining what they have spent on mobile bases, and the satellite service too.
> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive,
> there's no way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my
> region brings to my lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining about it.
Some of us actually have enough of a clue to get the lifestyle
with as good a net service as is available in the capital citys.
> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive, there's no
> way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my region brings to my
> lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining about it.
One of the problems with say, rural Australia is that in order for us to say,
eat, or to say, have electricity, or to, say, have water to drink, or to say,
have somewhere for our waste products to be pumped to and processed, then we
have to accept that there will be people who need to live in those regions so
these services can be provided for say, metro Melbourne.
Now, if you want people to live there then you need to provide some sort of
incentive. Make it attractive for people to either move there, or to stop them
moving to, say, Melbourne. One way of doing this is to provide them with the
same level of service in areas such as telecommunications that people in metro
areas enjoy.
One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult to entice
doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to make big
bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained" doctors being
more or less forced to practise in such areas until they fulfil their
commitment. Then they're out of there.
Oh, don't even expect to retain specialists. If you're lucky, they'll visit
these regions once every so often.
--
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
"Marts" <marts_57@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
newsq3nj3hflebbdqslcnhkjhrtnpp02e11f2@martz_57.c om...
> mattic wrote...
>
>> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
>> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive, there's
>> no
>> way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my region brings to
>> my
>> lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining about it.
>
> One of the problems with say, rural Australia is that in order for us to
> say,
> eat, or to say, have electricity, or to, say, have water to drink, or to
> say,
> have somewhere for our waste products to be pumped to and processed, then
> we
> have to accept that there will be people who need to live in those regions
> so
> these services can be provided for say, metro Melbourne.
>
> Now, if you want people to live there then you need to provide some sort
> of
> incentive. Make it attractive for people to either move there, or to stop
> them
> moving to, say, Melbourne. One way of doing this is to provide them with
> the
> same level of service in areas such as telecommunications that people in
> metro
> areas enjoy.
>
> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult to
> entice
> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to make
> big
> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained" doctors
> bein
Supply and demand, give more dollars
Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
> more or less forced to practise in such areas until they fulfil their
> commitment. Then they're out of there.
>
> Oh, don't even expect to retain specialists. If you're lucky, they'll
> visit
> these regions once every so often.
>
> --
> Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
"mattic" <this@wontwork.com> wrote in message
news:N4g_i.11986$CN4.11243@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Will Kemp" <Will@xxxx.Swaggie.net> wrote in message
> news:4709fb88$0$23787$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> Opel's service will be along
>> in a few months anyway - and it will be better than satellite.
>
> Pffffft!
>
> This "Opel" doesn't exist. No CEO, no staff, they don't even have a
> carrier licence!
> Their coverage maps are a joke, just a series of circles drawn around 10
> and 20 cent coins, they take in to account none of the gegraphical
> features of the land and are just complete fantasy.
"mattic" <this@wontwork.com> wrote in message
news:N4g_i.11985$CN4.935@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5msnrrFetepjU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>
> Precisely.
only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "mattic" <this@wontwork.com> wrote in message
> news:N4g_i.11985$CN4.935@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5msnrrFetepjU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>>
>> Precisely.
> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>
> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data packs.
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Marts" <marts_57@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> newsq3nj3hflebbdqslcnhkjhrtnpp02e11f2@martz_57.c om...
>> mattic wrote...
>>
>>> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
>>> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive,
>>> there's no
>>> way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my region
>>> brings to my
>>> lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining about it.
>>
>> One of the problems with say, rural Australia is that in order for
>> us to say,
>> eat, or to say, have electricity, or to, say, have water to drink,
>> or to say,
>> have somewhere for our waste products to be pumped to and processed,
>> then we
>> have to accept that there will be people who need to live in those
>> regions so
>> these services can be provided for say, metro Melbourne.
>>
>> Now, if you want people to live there then you need to provide some
>> sort of
>> incentive. Make it attractive for people to either move there, or to
>> stop them
>> moving to, say, Melbourne. One way of doing this is to provide them
>> with the
>> same level of service in areas such as telecommunications that
>> people in metro
>> areas enjoy.
>>
>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult
>> to entice
>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to
>> make big
>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>> doctors bein
>
> Supply and demand, give more dollars
> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
It aint about the money.
>> more or less forced to practise in such areas until they fulfil their
>> commitment. Then they're out of there.
>>
>> Oh, don't even expect to retain specialists. If you're lucky, they'll
>> visit
>> these regions once every so often.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5pub78Fslu5bU1@mid.individual.net...
> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>> month
>>>>>
>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROFL.
>>>>>
>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>
>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices then
>>>> build your own network or wait a long time before a competitor
>>>> bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>
>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you tho.
>
>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>
> More fool you.
>
>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>
> It will.
>
>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>
> There will be.
>
>> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
>
> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>
>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of Australia
>> unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>
> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in bids,
> fuckwit.
>
> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>
>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth given
>> the woeful performance of
>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>
> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>
>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and say,
>> "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's going to fail and you'll look
>> really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another billion; and
>> another."
>
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>
> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>
> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when it
> flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to give
> telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly deserves.
>
> I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still wetting its pants
> laughing.
I always think of the Rev. Ian Paisley, whenever Rod talks.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5pubcbFsoj5hU1@mid.individual.net...
> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>> "James Bell" <jamesbell@tellthetruthtelstra.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:470b3f88$0$23833$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a month
>>>
>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>
>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify ANY
>>> service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>
>>> ROFL.
>>>
>>> LUDICROUS.
>>
>>
>> Depends. Mobile data, no probs at all, I'd pay for the convenience
>> and the speed. I certainly wouldn't be using it as my primary
>> internet service. If I was, I'd be on ADSL or, if that wasn't
>> available, the 3G plan @ $149 isn't unreasonable given that, if I did
>> live where there wasn't ADSL, there's probably a really good reason
>> why I chose to live there. I think that's what we miss when we talk
>> about this subject. We talk as though internet access fast and cheap
>> is our reason for living. Well, if it is, move to where you can get
>> it. A major regional town, a cap city, the US of fucking A, if that's
>> your baby. If it's NOT important enough for you to move for, then
>> stop whining because you are where you want to be for whatever reason
>> is most important to you.
>> Australia's a real twat for Telcos. Massive space, virtually zero
>> population. When a suburb of Islamabad has 7 million people and can be
>> covered with 5 base stations, you can see why SingTel and the others
>> don't want to throw a cent the way of Australia.
>
> Have fun explaining what they have spent on mobile bases, and the
> satellite service too.
>
>> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
>> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive,
>> there's no way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my
>> region brings to my lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining about
>> it.
>
> Some of us actually have enough of a clue to get the lifestyle
> with as good a net service as is available in the capital citys.
"Marts" <marts_57@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:r84nj3lmjsnq5hng0hiv9dfr55pl87m8v2@martz_57.c om...
> mattic wrote...
>
>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>
> Some anonymous poster called "mattic" going on record? Please, give us a
> break.
I see what you mean. Though I'm not sure you should have been expecting
Reuters. It is what it is.
mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5pub78Fslu5bU1@mid.individual.net...
>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in
>>>>>> cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>
>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>> tho.
>>
>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>
>> More fool you.
>>
>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>
>> It will.
>>
>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>
>> There will be.
>>
>>> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
>>
>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>
>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>
>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>> bids, fuckwit.
>>
>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>
>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>> given the woeful performance of
>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>
>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>
>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's going to fail and
>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>> billion; and another."
>>
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>
>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>
>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still wetting its
>> pants laughing.
>
> I always think
Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog shit isnt capable of thought.
mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5pubcbFsoj5hU1@mid.individual.net...
>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>> "James Bell" <jamesbell@tellthetruthtelstra.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:470b3f88$0$23833$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>> month
>>>>
>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>>
>>>> ROFL.
>>>>
>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>
>>>
>>> Depends. Mobile data, no probs at all, I'd pay for the convenience
>>> and the speed. I certainly wouldn't be using it as my primary
>>> internet service. If I was, I'd be on ADSL or, if that wasn't
>>> available, the 3G plan @ $149 isn't unreasonable given that, if I
>>> did live where there wasn't ADSL, there's probably a really good
>>> reason why I chose to live there. I think that's what we miss when
>>> we talk about this subject. We talk as though internet access fast
>>> and cheap is our reason for living. Well, if it is, move to where
>>> you can get it. A major regional town, a cap city, the US of
>>> fucking A, if that's your baby. If it's NOT important enough for
>>> you to move for, then stop whining because you are where you want
>>> to be for whatever reason is most important to you.
>>> Australia's a real twat for Telcos. Massive space, virtually zero
>>> population. When a suburb of Islamabad has 7 million people and can
>>> be covered with 5 base stations, you can see why SingTel and the
>>> others don't want to throw a cent the way of Australia.
>>
>> Have fun explaining what they have spent on mobile bases, and the
>> satellite service too.
>>
>>> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
>>> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive,
>>> there's no way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my
>>> region brings to my lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining
>>> about it.
>>
>> Some of us actually have enough of a clue to get the lifestyle
>> with as good a net service as is available in the capital citys.
>
> Why are you still whining, then?
You wouldnt know what whining was if it bit you on your lard arse, child.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qgk0uFvs9feU1@mid.individual.net...
> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5pubcbFsoj5hU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>>> "James Bell" <jamesbell@tellthetruthtelstra.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:470b3f88$0$23833$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>> month
>>>>>
>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in cost.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROFL.
>>>>>
>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Depends. Mobile data, no probs at all, I'd pay for the convenience
>>>> and the speed. I certainly wouldn't be using it as my primary
>>>> internet service. If I was, I'd be on ADSL or, if that wasn't
>>>> available, the 3G plan @ $149 isn't unreasonable given that, if I
>>>> did live where there wasn't ADSL, there's probably a really good
>>>> reason why I chose to live there. I think that's what we miss when
>>>> we talk about this subject. We talk as though internet access fast
>>>> and cheap is our reason for living. Well, if it is, move to where
>>>> you can get it. A major regional town, a cap city, the US of
>>>> fucking A, if that's your baby. If it's NOT important enough for
>>>> you to move for, then stop whining because you are where you want
>>>> to be for whatever reason is most important to you.
>>>> Australia's a real twat for Telcos. Massive space, virtually zero
>>>> population. When a suburb of Islamabad has 7 million people and can
>>>> be covered with 5 base stations, you can see why SingTel and the
>>>> others don't want to throw a cent the way of Australia.
>>>
>>> Have fun explaining what they have spent on mobile bases, and the
>>> satellite service too.
>>>
>>>> I love Australia and the region where I live. My internet needs are
>>>> adequately catered for and, while not optimal and more expensive,
>>>> there's no way I'd move from all the advantages this country and my
>>>> region brings to my lifestyle. We all have choices. Stop whining
>>>> about it.
>>>
>>> Some of us actually have enough of a clue to get the lifestyle
>>> with as good a net service as is available in the capital citys.
>>
>> Why are you still whining, then?
>
> You wouldnt know what whining was if it bit you on your lard arse, child.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qgjv5F102mlfU1@mid.individual.net...
> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5pub78Fslu5bU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody justify
>>>>>>> ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being excessive in
>>>>>>> cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>> tho.
>>>
>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>
>>> More fool you.
>>>
>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>
>>> It will.
>>>
>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>
>>> There will be.
>>>
>>>> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
>>>
>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>
>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>
>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>> bids, fuckwit.
>>>
>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>
>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>
>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>
>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's going to fail and
>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>> billion; and another."
>>>
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>
>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>
>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still wetting
>>> its
>>> pants laughing.
>>
>> I always think
>
> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog shit isnt capable of thought.
mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5qgjv5F102mlfU1@mid.individual.net...
>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5pub78Fslu5bU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody
>>>>>>>> justify ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being
>>>>>>>> excessive in cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>>> tho.
>>>>
>>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>>
>>>> More fool you.
>>>>
>>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>>
>>>> It will.
>>>>
>>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>>
>>>> There will be.
>>>>
>>>>> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
>>>>
>>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>>
>>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>>
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>
>>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>>> bids, fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>>
>>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>>
>>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's going to fail and
>>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>>> billion; and another."
>>>>
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>
>>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>>
>>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still
>>>> wetting its
>>>> pants laughing.
>>>
>>> I always think
>>
>> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog shit isnt capable of thought.
>
> Excellent. I'm closing in.
The only thing thats closing in is your head up your lard arse, as always.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qh8tqFvg9bkU1@mid.individual.net...
> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5qgjv5F102mlfU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5pub78Fslu5bU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:5n1v4qFfoqb3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>> davmel <davmel_not_here@notvalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> James Bell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Only a fuckwit would be on PAYG when using more than 5mb in a
>>>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5MB? 5MB? WTF!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this 1975 again you FUCKWIT? How the fuck can anybody
>>>>>>>>> justify ANY service when anything over 5MB starts being
>>>>>>>>> excessive in cost. ROFL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LUDICROUS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh quit whining you little child. If you don't like the prices
>>>>>>>> then build your own network or wait a long time before a
>>>>>>>> competitor bothers to build a network with adequate coverage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or just notice that Opel will be available soon. Too much for you
>>>>>>> tho.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll go on record now and say that Opel will never surface.
>>>>>
>>>>> More fool you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a "company" that doesn't exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> It will.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's no CEO, no staff, no premises,
>>>>>
>>>>> There will be.
>>>>>
>>>>>> they don't even have a fucking carrier licence ffs!
>>>>>
>>>>> They dont need one and if they do, they'll get one.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Waltzing up to the Government and threatening to pull out of
>>>>>> Australia unless Optus gets the billion bucks
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>
>>>>> The govt put that up for tender and both Optarse and Telstra put in
>>>>> bids, fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Telstra's was deliberately non compliant.
>>>>>
>>>>>> was a measured ploy by SingTel and maybe not so far from the truth
>>>>>> given the woeful performance of
>>>>>> Optus compared to other off-shore SingTel concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bare faced pig ignorant lie with their mobile service.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, what WILL happen is O'Sullivan will sidle up again and
>>>>>> say, "Look guys, this is a compete fuck-up, it's going to fail and
>>>>>> you'll look really stupid. Unless, of course, you stump up another
>>>>>> billion; and another."
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it would STILL be much better to have real competition in rural
>>>>> areas so the consumers who cant get anything else are shafted with
>>>>> NextG utterly obscene data charges for any viable volume ANYWAY.
>>>>>
>>>>> After all, that money is only a tiny part of what the govt got when
>>>>> it flogged off telstra and its hilarious that that is being used to
>>>>> give telstra the shafting with a telephone pole that it so richly
>>>>> deserves. I bet which ever shinybum dreamt that one up is still
>>>>> wetting its
>>>>> pants laughing.
>>>>
>>>> I always think
>>>
>>> Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog shit isnt capable of thought.
>>
>> Excellent. I'm closing in.
>
> The only thing thats closing in is your head up your lard arse, as always.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qbllkFp4hhlU1@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "mattic" <this@wontwork.com> wrote in message
>> news:N4g_i.11985$CN4.935@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>
>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5msnrrFetepjU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>>>
>>> Precisely.
>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>>
>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
>
> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data
> packs.
>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult
>>> to entice
>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to
>>> make big
>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>>> doctors bein
>>
>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>
> It aint about the money.
Of course it is, Rod fucker. Youd find you would have all the doctors you
need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote
>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>>>> Precisely.
>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
>> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data packs.
> maybe for pensioners like you
Not a pensioner, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult to entice
>>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to make big
>>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained" doctors bein
>>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>> It aint about the money.
> Of course it is
Nope.
> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)
Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
Mine flys in and out every week, literally. He's an ex south african
jew and there are no synagogs here, and he wants his kids to go
to jewish private schools and there aint none of those here either.
One hell of a way to 'live' and there are plenty of others who arent
interested in that sort of lifestyle, even at that sort of income per year.
As always, you have never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
> > Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)
>
> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
Maybe because they earn their dough from city practices and wouldn't get it if
they had practices outside of the rural areas. That's why they're not interested
in setting up shop outside of the cities, except as a once in a blue moon visit.
Marts <marts_57@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and
>>> more, if they were all on a wage of $500k (example)
>> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
>> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
> Maybe because they earn their dough from city practices and
> wouldn't get it if they had practices outside of the rural areas.
> That's why they're not interested in setting up shop outside
> of the cities, except as a once in a blue moon visit.
This one flys in every week and spends the whole
week here, just goes home on the weekends.
He just commutes from Sydney because that works
better for his family and his own weekend activitys.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qu832F117capU1@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> mattic <this@wontwork.com> wrote
>>>>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> Only a fool would use NextG for data of any volume.
>
>>>>> Precisely.
>
>>> only a fool would use NextG without a data pack for any volume
>
>>>> for anyone else, NextG is very suitable
>
>>> Wrong. The data charges are STILL utterly obscene even with the data
>>> packs.
>
>> maybe for pensioners like you
>
> Not a pensioner, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qu8d7F11v7h5U1@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> One real area of concern is that of health services. It is difficult
>>>>> to entice
>>>>> doctors out of the larger cities, mainly because the opportunity to
>>>>> make big
>>>>> bucks isn't there. So, what we see are lots of "foreign trained"
>>>>> doctors bein
>
>>>> Supply and demand, give more dollars
>>>> Increase medicare rebate in that area if necessary
>
>>> It aint about the money.
>
>> Of course it is
>
> Nope.
>
>> Youd find you would have all the doctors you need and more, if they were
>> all on a wage of $500k (example)
>
> Have fun explaining the specialists who are on that sort of income, who
> arent interested in going there, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
> Mine flys in and out every week, literally. He's an ex south african
> jew and there are no synagogs here, and he wants his kids to go
> to jewish private schools and there aint none of those here either.
Re: What is wrong with Next G? 
q3nj3hflebbdqslcnhkjhrtnpp02e11f2@martz_57.c om...