Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
>invalid@example.com wrote:
>
>> Ari wrote:
>>>
>>>Anonymous wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ari wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea who you are, Mr. Anonymouse. lol
>>>>
>>>> Just one more thing you're clueless about.
>>>
>>>I have no idea who you are either, Mrs. Anonymouse. lol
>>
>> If you are implying that I am someone you know, I am not.
>
>How the fuck do you know what I know, Mrs. Anon?
*plonk*
Free clue: those who keep responding to trolls often end
up killfiled along with the trolls.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Einstein wrote:
>You said max length. Ooops! Of course that only saves you from sloppy
>downards level work, but imo if someone was after you, this would now
>give them the correct length to try instead of working their way up.
>It is 7 bits larger than the one below (If we assume 128 outcomes, but
>your not quite there) however the man now discounts all other size
>standards, saving some brute force time.
I fail to see how someone password guessing on a website can
possibly know that the particular account he is trying to
crack belongs to a particular pseudononymous poster in an
obscure newsgroup.
>Still you are as close to maximal security as can be created.
>Now I ask, why the hell do you need this much security? lol
Because once I decided hat I needed somthing better than using
the name of my cat on every website and started using a list of
passwords, it was almost no extra effort to use maximum-length
randomish data for those passwords.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Non scrivetemi wrote:
> No One wrote:
>
>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>
> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
> itself?
>
> Are you stoned??
>
His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
No, my goal has primarily been to publicly humiliate that turgid,
pretentious, reprehensible slimebag.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
> I fail to see how someone password guessing on a website can
> possibly know that the particular account he is trying to
> crack belongs to a particular pseudononymous poster in an
> obscure newsgroup.
Hmmm, good point. GL, and dont forget the tinfoil hat :(
>>Still you are as close to maximal security as can be created.
>>Now I ask, why the hell do you need this much security? lol
>
> Because once I decided hat I needed somthing better than using
> the name of my cat on every website and started using a list of
> passwords, it was almost no extra effort to use maximum-length
> randomish data for those passwords.
Which rolls back to my previous statement, if you are unwilling, too
st00pid or mentally retarded to memorize 16 multi-character passphrases for
important data protection then either the data isn't important or you're
fucked.
--
An Explanation Of The Need To Be "Anonymous" http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:10:54 +0100 (CET), Non scrivetemi wrote:
> No One wrote:
>
>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>
> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
> itself?
>
> Are you stoned??
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:56:09 -0500, No One wrote:
> Non scrivetemi wrote:
>> No One wrote:
>>
>>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>>
>> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
>> itself?
>>
>> Are you stoned??
>>
>
> His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
> obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
> Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
Really? By what fact do you ascertain this bit of bullshit?
> No, my goal has primarily been to publicly humiliate that turgid,
> pretentious, reprehensible slimebag.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:56:09 -0500, No One wrote:
>
>> Non scrivetemi wrote:
>>> No One wrote:
>>>
>>>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>>>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>>> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
>>> itself?
>>>
>>> Are you stoned??
>>>
>> His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
>> obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
>> Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
>
> Really? By what fact do you ascertain this bit of bullshit?
I'll answer your question after you answer mine.
What is the *name* of the business where you are an employer?
Answering that one question will achieve two objectives, both of
which would be to your advantage. One, it would vindicate you of
making a false claim; and two, it would prove me to be incorrect
in calling you a charlatan, a conniving hypocrite, a fraud, and
an imposter. Anybody that was innocent of those charges would jump
at the opportunity.
>
>> No, my goal has primarily been to publicly humiliate that turgid,
>> pretentious, reprehensible slimebag.
>
> lol Just stick your hand out and take the paycheck from *employers like
> me*.
You keep digging yourself a deeper hole.
Nobody here believes that. Everybody knows you're lying.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:37:41 -0500, No One wrote:
>>>> No One wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>>>>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>>>> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
>>>> itself?
>>>>
>>>> Are you stoned??
>>>>
>>> His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
>>> obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
>>> Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
>>
>> Really? By what fact do you ascertain this bit of bullshit?
>
> I'll answer your question after you answer mine.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:37:41 -0500, No One wrote:
>>> No, my goal has primarily been to publicly humiliate that turgid,
>>> pretentious, reprehensible slimebag.
>>
>> lol Just stick your hand out and take the paycheck from *employers like
>> me*.
>
> You keep digging yourself a deeper hole.
> Nobody here believes that. Everybody knows you're lying.
How that concerns me, let me count your aliases, Norman, No One, Orwell,
Non, Scrotum hairs, ad infinitum lol lol
--
An Explanation Of The Need To Be "Anonymous" http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:10:54 +0100 (CET), Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
> > No One wrote:
> >
> >> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
> >> employer, and prove me wrong.
> >
> > You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
> > itself?
> >
> > Are you stoned??
>
> Wanna fukk with this filthy Jew? Did your people kill Christ?
> Huh?
I'm already fucking with you. You're a filthy Jew. It's easy.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:37:41 -0500, No One wrote:
>
> >>>> No One wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
> >>>>> employer, and prove me wrong.
> >>>> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
> >>>> itself?
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you stoned??
> >>>>
> >>> His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
> >>> obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
> >>> Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
> >>
> >> Really? By what fact do you ascertain this bit of bullshit?
> >
> > I'll answer your question after you answer mine.
>
> Ever.
Were you a bit distressed by being backed into a corner and mistyped
"never" there barcode-cryptoboi?
That's OK, we already knew your employer shtick was a wagon load of
donkey droppings anyway. You really didn't give away anything. :)
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:37:41 -0500, No One wrote:
>
>>>>> No One wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Simply give the *name* of the business where you are the
>>>>>> employer, and prove me wrong.
>>>>> You want a filthy jew to stand up like a man and prove
>>>>> itself?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you stoned??
>>>>>
>>>> His ethnic background is of no concern of mine. Besides, he is
>>>> obviously not a "real" Jew, unless he's actively practicing
>>>> Judaism, which, I feel, we can safely rule out that possibility.
>>> Really? By what fact do you ascertain this bit of bullshit?
>> I'll answer your question after you answer mine.
>
> Ever.
That doesn't make any sense. Let's try this again.
What is the *name* of the business where you claim to be an employer?
If you are not guilty of completely fabricating this story, then there is no
good reason for you not to take this opportunity to clear your name and
reputation of being a fraud and a swindling deceiver; in short, a liar.
In the same fell swoop you could also prove beyond doubt that I was wrong.
Why anyone would let this golden opportunity slip away is unreasonable.
I'm sure I don't just speak for myself when I say, I would like very
much to
know what type of work it is where you are the employer. Please, do tell.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:21:23 +0100 (CET), George Orwell wrote:
>
> >>>> Ari wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> invalid@example.com wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Axecrypt.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have no idea who you are, Mr. Anonymouse. lol
> >>>>
> >>>> Just one more thing you're clueless about.
> >>>
> >>>I have no idea who you are either, Mrs. Anonymouse. lol
> >>
> >> If you are implying that I am someone you know, I am not.
> >
> > The only thing Ari is implying, is that he's an idiot. When he
> > showed up here his introduction was a horrible embarrassment
> > over some sort of lame brain bar code encryption scheme he
> > apparently dreamed up one night after a few too many plastic
> > cups of panther piss. His "remedy", if you care to call it
> > that, to making a total and utter fool of himself before he
> > ever really got off the starting block, was to invent some sort
> > of Captain Crunch decoder ring fantasy job where he sold his
> > bar code encryption to his employer for some "undisclosed sum".
> > In the course of propping up that obvious lie he also invented
> > a 40 acre nuclear test facility that this unnamed employer sent
> > him to for some unnamed purpose. If you know anything about
> > square footage and nuclear tests at all, even just from
> > watching the movies, you realize just how ridiculous that whole
> > story is.
>
> lol Just stick your hand out and take the paycheck from
> *employers like me*.
Re: Please rip apart a Noob's pathetic attempts...
Ari wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:54:31 -0500, No One wrote:
>
> >>> The only thing Ari is implying, is that he's an idiot. When he showed up
> >>> here his introduction was a horrible embarrassment over some sort of
> >>> lame brain bar code encryption scheme he apparently dreamed up one
> >>> night after a few too many plastic cups of panther piss. His "remedy",
> >>> if you care to call it that, to making a total and utter fool of
> >>> himself before he ever really got off the starting block, was to invent
> >>> some sort of Captain Crunch decoder ring fantasy job where he sold his
> >>> bar code encryption to his employer for some "undisclosed sum". In the
> >>> course of propping up that obvious lie he also invented a 40 acre
> >>> nuclear test facility that this unnamed employer sent him to for some
> >>> unnamed purpose. If you know anything about square footage and nuclear
> >>> tests at all, even just from watching the movies, you realize just how
> >>> ridiculous that whole story is.
> >>
> >> lol Just stick your hand out and take the paycheck from *employers like
> >> me*.
> >
> > If you really expect anyone here to believe you,
>
> I give a fuck what you think , Ms. Anonymousey??
Apparently you do since you speak on command.
>
> > you're going to have to provide a *name* and *location* of this "place of employment". Here on the
>
> You're remailers screwing up your post, Coward.
Sorry, but did you mean "Your" and "remailer is", and "coward" you
illiterate cunt?
>
> > Internet,
> > anyone can say anything. So we need verifiable facts. Otherwise, you
> > have no
> > credibility whatsoever.
> >
> > Please, give us some proof that what you say is the truth.
>
> Blow me.