Lassi Hippeläinen <lahippel.at.ieee.org@moon.invalid> wrote:
> Ari Silversteinn wrote:
>
> > On 08 Aug 2005 08:30:49 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> >
> >>>> Barcode email?
> >>>>
> >>>> Email is electronic. That's why they call it 'email'. There's
> >>>> nothing there to barcode.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, we have a two hundred post thread about it and this is your
> >>> revelation?
> >>
> >> No, after nearly *four* hundred posts, the "revelation" is that we can
> >> add counting to the list of concepts which are alien to you.
> >
> > Thanks, Frank, off to the dumbfile you go.
> >
> > <plonk>
> >
> > Btw, Frank, of all these alien concepts that are in my life, explain to me
> > why it is a dumb MF like me can generate enough interest to draw out
> > hundreds of posts? Including yours.
>
> First you plonk someone, and then you ask a question from that someone...
> Plonking is yet another concept alien to you.
>
> (There is nothing *interesting* in this thread. Please stop feeding the
> troll.)
Sorry, but I see no troll here. Perhaps he would *like* to be a troll,
but he lacks the qualifications. However he *does* have most, if not
all, the qualifications for that other Usenet type.
bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
> Frank Slootweg wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but I see no troll here. Perhaps he would *like* to be a troll,
>>but he lacks the qualifications.
>
> Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
trolls don't generally plonk their food sources...
--
"they threw a rope around yer neck to watch you dance the jig of death
then left ya for the starvin' crows, hoverin' like hungry whores
one flew down plucked out yer eye, the other he had in his sights
ya snarled at him, said leave me be - i need the bugger so i can see"
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:08:36 -0400, kurt wismer wrote:
> bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Frank Slootweg wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but I see no troll here. Perhaps he would *like* to be a troll,
>>>but he lacks the qualifications.
>>
>> Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>
> trolls don't generally plonk their food sources...
Hey Kurt!
Didn't you have an AV/help site up ages ago? I think I had an article
published there about using PKZip command line options to do backups
across multiple floppies (yeah that long ago). ;)
"kurt wismer" <kurtw@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:TTQKe.18069$6d4.1267853@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Frank Slootweg wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but I see no troll here. Perhaps he would *like*
>>> to be a troll,
>>>but he lacks the qualifications.
>>
>> Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>
> trolls don't generally plonk their food sources...
>
ROFL!
Trolls have been known to bite the hand that feeds them, and
I was once "double-plonked" by a troll in this very news
group. It might even have been Mr. Silversteinn himself.
Notice the cross-posting. That's one way for a troll to
insure that he never goes hungry. If the handouts start
getting thin in one place, just add another news group to
the list and carry on.
> Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>
> We all know what barcodes are. Everyone knows what email is.
>
> Barcode email?
>
> It's not secure, but it doesn't make enough sense to be insecure
> either. All it's good for is bait, and for that it proved pretty
> good.
I suppose that was a back handed compliment so than you. It is secure, we
disagree, and if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll ever
created on Usenet.
--
Drop the alphabet for email
> On 11 Aug 2005 14:50:13 -0700, bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>>Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>>
>>We all know what barcodes are. Everyone knows what email is.
>>
>>Barcode email?
>>
>>It's not secure, but it doesn't make enough sense to be insecure
>>either. All it's good for is bait, and for that it proved pretty
>>good.
>
>
> I suppose that was a back handed compliment so than you. It is secure, we
> disagree, and if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll ever
> created on Usenet.
In Sci.Crypt, "troll" is defined as anyone who disagrees with the
resident "experts". THEY *told* you what to think, and you refused
to capitulate; therefore, you have "trolled" Sci.Crypt. Yes, this is
a rather cowardly definition, but it is what's in vogue here. Do not
worry though, as there are lots of posters who don't fall into line,
and each of these gets called a "moron" or a "troll" with regularity.
bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
> Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Sorry, but I see no troll here. Perhaps he would *like* to be a troll,
> > but he lacks the qualifications.
>
> Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
I said he wasn't/isn't a troll. I didn't say he was't trolling. There
is a difference. For example, one can be funny without being a
comedian. (Oops, bad analogy because it involves one of the lacking
qualifications.)
>>>Barcode email?
>>>
>>>It's not secure, but it doesn't make enough sense to be insecure
>>>either. All it's good for is bait, and for that it proved pretty
>>>good.
>>
>> I suppose that was a back handed compliment so than you. It is secure, we
>> disagree, and if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll ever
>> created on Usenet.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:48:02 +1000, Crypto@S.M.S wrote:
> In Sci.Crypt, "troll" is defined as anyone who disagrees with the
> resident "experts". THEY *told* you what to think, and you refused
> to capitulate; therefore, you have "trolled" Sci.Crypt. Yes, this is
> a rather cowardly definition, but it is what's in vogue here. Do not
> worry though, as there are lots of posters who don't fall into line,
> and each of these gets called a "moron" or a "troll" with regularity.
When they call me troll, it makes me cry, wiping tears, sniffling, getting
better, ok now.
Yes, I am well aware of supersized Usenet egos and the time they have to
waste in defending their "Usenet reputations".
Sandbox mentalities.
--
Drop the alphabet for email
In comp.security.misc Ari Silversteinn <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz> wrote:
> if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll ever
> created on Usenet.
Sorry, jester, up to now, you're just average.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Almighty Father, who wilt hear the prayer of those that love Thee, we pray
Thee to be with those who brave heights of Thy heaven and who carry the
battle to our enemies. Guard and protect them, we pray Thee, as they fly
the appointed rounds." - Chaplain William Downey, prayer for the Enola Gay.
<Crypto@S.M.S> wrote in message
news:11fo3f8t1imetff@news.supernews.com...
> Ari Silversteinn wrote:
>
>> On 11 Aug 2005 14:50:13 -0700, bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>>>
>>>We all know what barcodes are. Everyone knows what email is.
>>>
>>>Barcode email?
>>>
>>>It's not secure, but it doesn't make enough sense to be insecure
>>>either. All it's good for is bait, and for that it proved pretty
>>>good.
>>
>>
>> I suppose that was a back handed compliment so than you. It is
>> secure, we
>> disagree, and if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll
>> ever
>> created on Usenet.
>
> In Sci.Crypt, "troll" is defined as anyone who disagrees with the
> resident "experts". THEY *told* you what to think, and you refused
> to capitulate; therefore, you have "trolled" Sci.Crypt. Yes, this
> is
> a rather cowardly definition, but it is what's in vogue here. Do
> not
> worry though, as there are lots of posters who don't fall into
> line,
> and each of these gets called a "moron" or a "troll" with
> regularity.
Wow in alt.games.* you also have to be annoying and stupid
--
"When you have to choose between a first-rate company with a
second-rate product and a second-rate company with a first-rate
product, it's never an ideal choice. " -Ed (www.overclockers.com)
Ari Silversteinn wrote:
>>Have to disagree. Top-notch trolling.
>>
>>We all know what barcodes are. Everyone knows what email is.
>>
>>Barcode email?
>>
>>It's not secure, but it doesn't make enough sense to be insecure
>>either. All it's good for is bait, and for that it proved pretty
>>good.
>
>
> I suppose that was a back handed compliment so than you. It is secure, we
> disagree, and if I am a troll, then I am the smartest MFing troll ever
> created on Usenet.
Whatever. Top-notch trolling is a lot like skillful wanking.
Ari Silversteinn wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:07:04 GMT, Bryan Olson wrote:
>
> > Top-notch trolling is a lot like skillful wanking.
>
> I wouldn't know. Elaborate on your experiences with this wanking.
Did you just "I know you are but what am I?" Bryan?
In article <1124125069.807536.7490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.c om> tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Ari Silversteinn wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:07:04 GMT, Bryan Olson wrote:
> >
> > > Top-notch trolling is a lot like skillful wanking.
> >
> > I wouldn't know. Elaborate on your experiences with this wanking.
>
> Did you just "I know you are but what am I?" Bryan?
>
> ... usenet has hit an all time low ...
>
> What next? You'll call him a poopyhead?
>
Re: Barcode Email 
Linear Mode
