On 12 Aug 2005 04:22:53 -0000, Crash Override wrote:
>> The people who do not like that stuff are already aware of it, Jan, so quit
>> acting like you're telling on your sister's smoking in the bathroom. As to
>> illegal, under what reasoning? It's no attack, it's circulating data for
>> recollection.
>
> I wonder about that. Woudn't something like this qualify as a Denial
> of Service attack if anyone were to actually attempt such a scheme?
This has been mentioned but there is no intent for DoS although I am
uncertain how this could create a DoS issue when the routine is especially
created to restore data. Then again, my understanding of DoS is limited.