Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Feb 2, 3:42*am, "Dave -Turner" <ad...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> So you can't answer my question of "what security credentials and experience
> he has" ???
> It's a simple question.
Just ignore him. He's the latest incarnation of the sci.crypt troll.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On 2/2/2011 12:39 AM, DasFox wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:34:05 +0800, Dave -Turner wrote:
>
>> Who is Paul Wilders anyway? ie. what security credentials and experience
>> does he have? if i may ask. He just seems like a forum admin
>> Thankyou
>
> BACK OFF...Paul Wilders is FOUNDER...
>
> YOU...?
Back off?
Someone insulted your religion, eh?
The man asked you a direct question:
"what security credentials and experience does he have? if i may ask..."
I will infer from your LACK of a coherent answer, that you do not know the answer.
As a matter of fact, DF, that's typical. There's a whole lot you don't know.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:18:48 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:
> On 2/2/2011 12:39 AM, DasFox wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:34:05 +0800, Dave -Turner wrote:
>>
>>> Who is Paul Wilders anyway? ie. what security credentials and experience
>>> does he have? if i may ask. He just seems like a forum admin
>>> Thankyou
>>
>> BACK OFF...Paul Wilders is FOUNDER...
>>
>> YOU...?
>
> Back off?
>
> Someone insulted your religion, eh?
>
> The man asked you a direct question:
>
> "what security credentials and experience does he have? if i may ask..."
>
> I will infer from your LACK of a coherent answer, that you do not know the answer.
INFER anything you want...WRONG...you will be...
> As a matter of fact, DF, that's typical. There's a whole lot you don't know.
>
> Non compos mentis.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:05:48 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
> DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com> wrote in news:iic1re$iu2$1
> @news.mixmin.net:
>
>> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>>
>
> Your knowledge of Latin is just as poor as your knowledge of
> technical matters, you cretin.
>
> The correct Latin for the sentence fragment is: ...ad Deum qui
> laetificat juventutem meam (...to God who brings joy to my
> youth).
>
> You really are a consummate moron.
>
> Oh, and of course: THANKS
Mr. outis, I would beg your indulgence. As quoted by DasFox, the Latin
Classical is fairly accurate. It also shows that DasFox was at some
point in his wretched past a Roman Catholic altar boy...or at least
trained in the participation and recitation of the Latin Catholic mass
in publica. As was I ;)
The phrasing comes very early in the incantation between priest and
altar servants who combine in a charming duo of recitation-response
typically out of earshot of the Mass' celebratants.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:05:48 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
> DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com> wrote in news:iic1re$iu2$1
> @news.mixmin.net:
>
>> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>>
>
> Your knowledge of Latin is just as poor as your knowledge of
> technical matters, you cretin.
>
> The correct Latin for the sentence fragment is: ...ad Deum qui
> laetificat juventutem meam (...to God who brings joy to my
> youth).
>
> You really are a consummate moron.
>
> Oh, and of course: THANKS
ANOTHER anonymous imbecile...WOW...IMPRESSIVE...LOL
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
In article <iib58i$js7$1@news.mixmin.net>, DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com>
wrote:
> BACK OFF...Paul Wilders is FOUNDER...
Wow. One must certainly "BACK OFF..." then. Goodness, me, I had no idea
of the man's holiness. Does he wear white robes? Do you go to his temple
and sit at his feet? Do you wash his feet? Did those feet in ancient
times, etc.? Is he going to take all his followers to a planet in the
sky? Quaesitum ad fontem solos deducere verpos?
Yer a moron. Herr Gruppenführer Wilders probably is too, if he
encourages acolytes like you. You're about as much about TECH as my
toe-jam.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:27:15 -0500, DasFox wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:05:48 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
>
>> DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com> wrote in news:iic1re$iu2$1
>> @news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>>>
>>
>> Your knowledge of Latin is just as poor as your knowledge of
>> technical matters, you cretin.
>>
>> The correct Latin for the sentence fragment is: ...ad Deum qui
>> laetificat juventutem meam (...to God who brings joy to my
>> youth).
>>
>> You really are a consummate moron.
>>
>> Oh, and of course: THANKS
>
> ANOTHER anonymous imbecile...WOW...IMPRESSIVE...LOL
>
> THANKS
DasFox, Mr. outis isn't anonymous. Either by posting header or by
information from Frank Camper(stein) ;). Although I have to be square,
it is almost impossible to tell if this "outis" is the same individual
as the archived "outis".
-- heremypants@hushmail.com http://heremypants.weebly.com/
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On 2/2/2011 8:47 AM, DasFox wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:18:48 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2011 12:39 AM, DasFox wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:34:05 +0800, Dave -Turner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who is Paul Wilders anyway? ie. what security credentials and experience
>>>> does he have? if i may ask. He just seems like a forum admin
>>>> Thankyou
>>>
>>> BACK OFF...Paul Wilders is FOUNDER...
>>>
>>> YOU...?
>>
>> Back off?
>>
>> Someone insulted your religion, eh?
>>
>> The man asked you a direct question:
>>
>> "what security credentials and experience does he have? if i may ask..."
>>
>> I will infer from your LACK of a coherent answer, that you do not know the answer.
>
> INFER anything you want...WRONG...you will be...
>
>> As a matter of fact, DF, that's typical. There's a whole lot you don't know.
>>
>> Non compos mentis.
>
> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>
> THANKS
I'm kind of getting a kick out of having you around as a punching bag.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:34:03 -0500, Prinzip Gavrilo wrote:
> In article <iib58i$js7$1@news.mixmin.net>, DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> BACK OFF...Paul Wilders is FOUNDER...
>
> Wow. One must certainly "BACK OFF..." then. Goodness, me, I had no idea
> of the man's holiness. Does he wear white robes? Do you go to his temple
> and sit at his feet? Do you wash his feet? Did those feet in ancient
> times, etc.? Is he going to take all his followers to a planet in the
> sky? Quaesitum ad fontem solos deducere verpos?
>
> Yer a moron. Herr Gruppenführer Wilders probably is too, if he
> encourages acolytes like you. You're about as much about TECH as my
> toe-jam.
>
> THANKS!
Mr. Gavrilo, I have read this thread, have a question since I, too, am
a Wilders participant.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
In article <201102022149.UTC.iicjgs$mhu$1@tioat.net>,
heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote:
> What is the importance of Paul Wilders credentials?
To me, none, but what's the harm in asking? What's the harm in
answering? "Nothing asked, nothing given" as my dear mother used to say.
Mr. W. either has credentials that make him proud, or he has credentials
that shame him, or he has no credentials at all. Why is everyone so
quiet about these credentials (or lack thereof)?
In fact, creating a forum would probably be a good way of learning about
a subject about which the (shall we say) "Founder" knows little. That
may or may not be the case. I've never visited the "Wilders Forum" nor
shall I. I have noticed that a lot of eejits from there have started
posting in apas, which is kind of sad. Mr. Wilders seems to toss people
out of his forum pretty regularly too.
I don't like Herr Fox. He comes across as a spoiled 13-year-old who
knows very little but thinks that he does. No credentials at all, one
might say.
--
Next year in Sarajevo ...
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:13:58 -0500, Prinzip Gavrilo wrote:
> In article <201102022149.UTC.iicjgs$mhu$1@tioat.net>,
> heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What is the importance of Paul Wilders credentials?
>
> To me, none, but what's the harm in asking? What's the harm in
> answering? "Nothing asked, nothing given" as my dear mother used to say.
The harm would be in the incredible waste of time you and several
others have indulged. Then, it is _your_ time of course ;)
It is a forum for discussion. The founder's credentials are
superfluous, imho.
> I don't like Herr Fox. He comes across as a spoiled 13-year-old who
> knows very little but thinks that he does. No credentials at all, one
> might say.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:201102022113.UTC.iiche5$lsa$1@tioat.net:
>> DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>>>
>>
>> Your knowledge of Latin is just as poor as your knowledge
>> of technical matters, you cretin.
>>
>> The correct Latin for the sentence fragment is: ...ad Deum
>> qui laetificat juventutem meam (...to God who brings joy
>> to my youth).
> Mr. outis, I would beg your indulgence. As quoted by
> DasFox, the Latin Classical is fairly accurate. It also
> shows that DasFox was at some point in his wretched past a
> Roman Catholic altar boy...or at least trained in the
> participation and recitation of the Latin Catholic mass in
> publica. As was I ;)
>
> The phrasing comes very early in the incantation between
> priest and altar servants who combine in a charming duo of
> recitation-response typically out of earshot of the Mass'
> celebratants.
>
> Were you so predisposed as a youth?
Dasfox's Latin is utterly wrong, including failing to
capitalize Deum (God), misspelling laetificat, using meum
instead of meam (ie., wrong gender) and, especially
egregiously, splitting the single word juventutem into two
nonexistent words, uvum and tutum. That's a lot of error to
crowd into one short misquotation - but Dasfox manages to
accomplish it because he's a consummate dunce.
Dasfox's misquote is from the the introductory part of the
Tridentine Latin Mass (i.e., the Mass of the Catechumens):
Priest: Introibo ad altare Dei (I will go unto the altar of
God)
Response: ...ad Deum qui laetificat juventutem meam. (...to
God who brings joy to my youth)
I studied classical Latin intensively for four years (and
ancient Greek for three) and could speak Latin fluently in my
youth! Trained by Jesuits. Unlike Dasfox, I know what I'm
talking about!
Regards,
PS My pseudonym, nemo outis, is the concatenation of the
Latin and Greek words for "no one" or "nobody. Anyone who
has read Homer in the original Greek will instantly recognize
"outis" as the response of the cyclops, Polyphemus, to the
questions from his fellow cyclopes regarding who is harming
him when Odysseus (who has falsely given his name as outis)
puts Polyphemus' single eye out.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:00:19 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
> heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote in
> news:201102022113.UTC.iiche5$lsa$1@tioat.net:
>
>>> DasFox <dasfox@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ad deum qui latificat, uvum tutum meum.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your knowledge of Latin is just as poor as your knowledge
>>> of technical matters, you cretin.
>>>
>>> The correct Latin for the sentence fragment is: ...ad Deum
>>> qui laetificat juventutem meam (...to God who brings joy
>>> to my youth).
>
>
>> Mr. outis, I would beg your indulgence. As quoted by
>> DasFox, the Latin Classical is fairly accurate. It also
>> shows that DasFox was at some point in his wretched past a
>> Roman Catholic altar boy...or at least trained in the
>> participation and recitation of the Latin Catholic mass in
>> publica. As was I ;)
>>
>> The phrasing comes very early in the incantation between
>> priest and altar servants who combine in a charming duo of
>> recitation-response typically out of earshot of the Mass'
>> celebratants.
>>
>> Were you so predisposed as a youth?
>
> Dasfox's Latin is utterly wrong, including failing to
> capitalize Deum (God), misspelling laetificat, using meum
> instead of meam (ie., wrong gender) and, especially
> egregiously, splitting the single word juventutem into two
> nonexistent words, uvum and tutum. That's a lot of error to
> crowd into one short misquotation - but Dasfox manages to
> accomplish it because he's a consummate dunce.
Oooh, you're a nasty one!
> Dasfox's misquote is from the the introductory part of the
> Tridentine Latin Mass (i.e., the Mass of the Catechumens):
>
> Priest: Introibo ad altare Dei (I will go unto the altar of God)
> Response: ...ad Deum qui laetificat juventutem meam. (...to God
> who brings joy to my youth)
Thank you for the corroboration!
> I studied classical Latin intensively for four years (and
> ancient Greek for three) and could speak Latin fluently in my
> youth! Trained by Jesuits. Unlike Dasfox, I know what I'm
> talking about!
Did the Jesuits give you that sharp tongue? :). I was a Brothers Boy
and raised among the Dominicans. Note /was/. A simple Christian these
days. 6 years of Vulgate and Classical, not a bit of fun there.
> Regards,
>
> PS My pseudonym, nemo outis, is the concatenation of the
> Latin and Greek words for "no one" or "nobody.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:22:08 -0500, Prinzip Gavrilo wrote:
> In article <Xns9E8098A4AD289pqwertyu@69.16.185.247>,
> "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote:
>
>> PS My pseudonym, nemo outis, is the concatenation of the
>> Latin and Greek words for "no one" or "nobody.
>
> Cool. My pseudonym is the name of the dude who touched off the First
> World War.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:201102022331.UTC.iicph3$ob0$1@tioat.net:
> Did the Jesuits give you that sharp tongue? :). I was a
> Brothers Boy and raised among the Dominicans. Note /was/. A
> simple Christian these days. 6 years of Vulgate and
> Classical, not a bit of fun there.
Yes, the Jesuits gave me a sharp tongue, one which I have
further whetted to a razor edge in the 50 years since I left
Loyola - a man repays a teacher poorly if he doesn't refine the
skills :-) Trained me in rhetoric, elocution, argument and
debate too. Not for nothing do we have the word jesuitical :-)
And like every cynic trained by them, I'm an athiest.
Great private school I could only afford to attend because I won
a competitive scholarship.
The Jesuits were the Catholic Church's shock troops to combat
the Protestant Reformation. However, to the Jesuits' proud
boasts, the Dominicans, the inquisitors who combatted the
Cathars, smirkingly reply regarding their relative
effectiveness, "Met many Cathars lately?"
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:05:45 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:
> heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote in
> news:201102022331.UTC.iicph3$ob0$1@tioat.net:
>
>> Did the Jesuits give you that sharp tongue? :). I was a
>> Brothers Boy and raised among the Dominicans. Note /was/. A
>> simple Christian these days. 6 years of Vulgate and
>> Classical, not a bit of fun there.
>
> Yes, the Jesuits gave me a sharp tongue, one which I have
> further whetted to a razor edge in the 50 years since I left
> Loyola - a man repays a teacher poorly if he doesn't refine the
> skills :-)
Loyola? I can remember when they were a basketball powerhouse. Played
against them at CBC.
> Trained me in rhetoric, elocution, argument and
> debate too. Not for nothing do we have the word jesuitical :-)
> And like every cynic trained by them, I'm an athiest.
Sorry to hear :(
> Great private school I could only afford to attend because I won
> a competitive scholarship.
I followed a south side Chicago Christian Brother teacher/coach to
college.
> The Jesuits were the Catholic Church's shock troops to combat
> the Protestant Reformation. However, to the Jesuits' proud
> boasts, the Dominicans, the inquisitors who combatted the
> Cathars, smirkingly reply regarding their relative
> effectiveness, "Met many Cathars lately?"
>
> Regards,
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
"Tom St Denis" <tom@iahu.ca> wrote in message
news:6716bc38-da26-40a9-afa8-0da065b44fb2@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Just ignore him. He's the latest incarnation of the sci.crypt troll.
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:41:12 +0800, Dave -Turner wrote:
>> It is a forum for discussion. The founder's credentials are
>> superfluous, imho.
>
> Awesome? so what exactly are those credentials you speak so highly of? :)
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:36:12 +0800, Dave -Turner wrote:
> "Tom St Denis" <tom@iahu.ca> wrote in message
> news:6716bc38-da26-40a9-afa8-0da065b44fb2@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>> Just ignore him. He's the latest incarnation of the sci.crypt troll.
>
> Seems that way :-/
>
> There's always gotta be at least one, heh ...
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
In article <201102031738.UTC.iiep6s$c96$1@tioat.net>,
heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, you have accidentally trolled the wrong individual :)
I don't think that asking for credentials like that is a "troll." I
think that the more you guys pretend that it _is_, the more the rest of
us think that all y'all have summat to hide while washing each other's
feet.
"What're his credentials?"
"Irrelevant, for he is FOUNDER."
"Okay, but what are his credentials?"
"What difference does it make: he is FOUNDER."
"That's nice, but what're his credentials? I'd just like to know is all."
"******* Troll!"
and so on just doesn't cut it.
--
Next year in Sarajevo ...
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:46 -0500, Prinzip Gavrilo wrote:
> In article <201102031738.UTC.iiep6s$c96$1@tioat.net>,
> heirophant <heremypants@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, you have accidentally trolled the wrong individual :)
>
> I don't think that asking for credentials like that is a "troll." I
Re: Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs...
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:46 -0500, Prinzip Gavrilo wrote:
> I don't think
NO surprises there...LOL...
> that asking for credentials like that is a "troll." I think that the
> more you guys pretend that it _is_, the more the rest of us think
> that all y'all have summat to hide while washing each other's feet.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...
> "What're his credentials?"
> "Irrelevant, for he is FOUNDER."
> "Okay, but what are his credentials?"
> "What difference does it make: he is FOUNDER."
YES...GOT IT yet...?
> "That's nice, but what're his credentials? I'd just like to know is all."
> "******* Troll!"
Tech - Need Help...To GET OUT INFO To Noobs... 
Linear Mode
