
06-05-2012, 10:57 AM
|
| |
Re: BT ACR charge lawful? On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:59:00 +0100, "David WE Roberts"
<nospam@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>"Gareth" <hotmail.com@dgareth_remove.com> wrote in message
>news:4fcbc7cc$0$10743$5b6aafb4@news.zen.co.uk.. .
>> I'm not convinced, having glanced at the EU directive, that the *amount*
>> of money BT is charging for ACR is lawful.
>>
>> The initial aim and direction was for the service to be free. This was
>> modified to reasonable cost presumably following representations by
>> telephone companies about the initial cost of implementation.
>>
>> BT charges more for ACR than any other subscription service and excludes
>> ACR from value/feature packs.
>>
>> Has this been picked up before in terms of a formal complaint to Ofcom?
>
>
>ACR?
>TLA
>Ah - anonymous call rejection.
>TTFN
Also Alternative Carrier Routing, so its as bad as "DRM" as having
two meanings in the same broad context
--
Graham.
%Profound_observation% |