Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > Cellular Newsgroups > uk.telecom.mobile
Register FAQ Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Advertise Mark Forums Read

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:33 PM
Unimobiles.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Motorola are BACK

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451

--
http://www.unimobiles.com
http://giffgaff.unimobiles.com - FREE GiffGaff Simcard
Vintage, Retro and Collectable Mobile Phones

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2012, 02:59 PM
R. Mark Clayton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK


"Unimobiles.com" <sales@unimobiles.com> wrote in message
news:fg1h58pjsekqmm1jib18qaumbd15245nhd@4ax.com...
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451
>

It's not bad. No HDMI out as far as I can tell, but otherwise pretty good.
Seems to be pitched mid market, so the price may be interesting. At least
as good as Nokia's Lumia 920 recently announced.



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2012, 03:17 PM
Unimobiles.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:33:01 +0100, Unimobiles.com
<sales@unimobiles.com> wrote:

>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451


2Ghz processor, 2000maH Battery, but no 4G
To be sold as a mid range (I expect around 150-200 mark)

--
http://www.unimobiles.com
http://giffgaff.unimobiles.com - FREE GiffGaff Simcard
Vintage, Retro and Collectable Mobile Phones

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2012, 05:01 PM
Andy Burns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

Unimobiles.com wrote:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451


Sounds like battery life could well be the concern with the processor,
the fact they've had to bundle a power-tweaking app does nothing to
dispel that.


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2012, 08:49 PM
Steve Terry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

Unimobiles.com wrote:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451
>

Claims to be the first with an intel atom proccessor

Shurley the Orange San Diego was first?
£170+£15 top up on Orange PAYG

Steve Terry
--
Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at:
http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 01:33 AM
Theo Markettos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

Steve Terry <gfourwwk@tesco.net> wrote:
> Unimobiles.com wrote:
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19635451
> >

> Claims to be the first with an intel atom proccessor
>
> Shurley the Orange San Diego was first?
> £170+£15 top up on Orange PAYG


Indeed (or possibly one of the related versions - Xolo etc).

The SD looks like a nice phone, but the trouble is it's bootloader locked.
Intel wants to create a developer community around Android x86 - but if
developers can't change anything in the OS then that's really not going to
encourage enthusiasm. That's why it still runs Android 2.3 - ICS is
promised 'soon', but remains to be seen when and if 'soon' appears. I
wonder if the Moto will be similarly crippled.

Theo

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 05:58 AM
Andy Burns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

Theo Markettos wrote:

> The SD looks like a nice phone, but the trouble is it's bootloader locked.
> Intel wants to create a developer community around Android x86


Also most Android apps are device independent (compiled to run on
Dalvik) but some apps are compiled to native code (Firefox for one,
presumably some games too) are those developers going to bother with x86
versions as well as ARM?



Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 09:08 PM
alexd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Motorola are BACK

Andy Burns (for it is he) wrote:

> some apps are compiled to native code ... are those developers going to
> bother with x86 versions as well as ARM?


Obviously it should ship with qemu - it's an x86 after all, so should have
the horsepower to do it.

But in all seriousness, it seems like the Wintel monopoly is merely being
supplemented by an ARMdroid one. It would be nice if people thought about
portability. Or perhaps Google could mandate fat binaries or something.

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
22:05:45 up 6 days, 22:07, 6 users, load average: 1.08, 0.72, 0.63
Qua illic est reprehendit, illic est a vindicatum


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motorola cell phones mini FAQ John Navas alt.cellular.attws 1 07-03-2009 05:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45