Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Cellular Communications > Cellular Newsgroups > uk.telecom.mobile
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2006, 03:17 PM
Clueless2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts

<hairydog@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:1sn3g29llbu8a275ue49beb1u2385c0115@4ax.com...
> Eight traffic timeslots per channel. There can be many channels in a
> cell sector. (a BTS may have one or more sectors).


Of course there are many channels in a cell sector, but this does not change
the fact that a single channel will always have 8 physcial timeslots (even
half-rate cells operates on 8 physical timeslots per frame per channel,
expect in half-rate mode each "circuit" will transmit on every other frame).

In the infrasturture industry a BTS rack can normally accomdate several
radios (and hence several channels), but the term BTS is normally used to
discribe a single radio/channel hence leading to phrases like BTS2, BTS6
etc.

> OTOH, it is possible that not all 8 timeslots will be available in a
> coastal or very remote base.


You mean not used - the timeslots are always there in the basic structure
whether they are used or not.

> So it's unlikely there will be fewer than four slots per cell, and
> unlikely there will be more than 96.
>
> So "eight" is not always correct. But it's not a bad starting point.


No, you are technically incorrect, I am sorry there is always 8 timeslots
per channel, they may not all be used for voice or data, and some may be
used for broadcast or control channels, but the timeslot structure is always
8 per frame.



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2006, 05:49 PM
hairydog@despammed.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:17:54 +0100, "Clueless2" <nospam@nospam> wrote:

>but the term BTS is normally used to
>discribe a single radio/channel


Bullshit. Only the clueless would say that. Oh yes, you did. Nuff sed.


>> So it's unlikely there will be fewer than four slots per cell, and
>> unlikely there will be more than 96.
>>
>> So "eight" is not always correct. But it's not a bad starting point.

>
>No, you are technically incorrect, I am sorry there is always 8 timeslots
>per channel


Goodness, you are a cretin.

Try reading the eleventh word. It starts with a curly c, but the rest
isn't "hannel", is it? It very clearly says cell. Even the clueless
ought to be able to work out that I was talking about per cell, not
per channel.

--

Iain
the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones
http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html
Browse now while stocks last!

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2006, 01:46 PM
hairydog@despammed.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:55:49 +0100, "Clueless2" <nospam@nospam> wrote:

>I win you lose :-)


That's what you think, clueless.

--

Iain
the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones
http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html
Browse now while stocks last!

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2006, 04:03 PM
Bikini Whacks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts

In article <tgoag21e94cpfgb6lvpkdugrs4i5s1i1j7@4ax.com>,
hairydog@despammed.com says...
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:55:49 +0100, "Clueless2" <nospam@nospam> wrote:
>
> >I win you lose :-)

>
> That's what you think, clueless.
>
>

Didn't he just slap your face with his glove?

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2006, 11:15 PM
hairydog@despammed.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:03:20 +0100, Bikini Whacks
<throwoldvegetables@me.please> wrote:

>Didn't he just slap your face with his glove?


Glove? That was his nappy.

--

Iain
the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones
http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html
Browse now while stocks last!

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2006, 02:44 PM
Old Codger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mobile phone masts


Bikini Whacks wrote:
> In article <tgoag21e94cpfgb6lvpkdugrs4i5s1i1j7@4ax.com>,
> hairydog@despammed.com says...
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:55:49 +0100, "Clueless2" <nospam@nospam> wrote:
> >
> > >I win you lose :-)

> >
> > That's what you think, clueless.
> >
> >

> Didn't he just slap your face with his glove?


It never fails does it?
Regardless of how interesting or informative a thread might be the
abuse level always rises the longer it gets. What did we manage this
time? 17 posts before descending to the level of childish playground
name-calling, not bad by usenet standards I suppose.
How does it go?
"I didn't come here to be inslulted."
"Really - where do you normally go then?"


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vodafone and Orange to share mobile phone networks {{{{{Welcome}}}}} uk.telecom.mobile 6 02-08-2007 08:17 PM
VoIP Phone works like a mobile phone - no PC is required! voiptutorial@gmail.com uk.telecom.voip 26 10-06-2006 08:40 AM
Mobile Casino - Mobile Phone Casino - Casino on your Mobile Phone is launched! stoppressnews alt.cellular.nokia 0 09-14-2006 03:16 PM
Jajah Mobile review pandemia@gmail.com uk.telecom.voip 0 08-23-2005 07:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45