On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:59:16 +0100, Clint Sharp wrote:
> In message <f8b2ek$r4$1@news.datemas.de>, "dennis@home"
> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> writes
>>
>>"Clint Sharp" <clint@clintsmc.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:MwuL4wBG9EqGFwRu@clintsmc.demon.co.uk...
>>> It's official, top scientists in an independent study have declared
>>> that Lenny and the alarmist pseudo science drivel he and his type punt
>>> as 'evidence' is more harmful to people's health than mobile phone
>>> masts.
>>
>>It doesn't say anything new.
>>I already told Lenny that he was harming more people than all the mobiles
>>in the world but he just ignores it and keeps on with his garbage. I
>>suppose I should report him to the authorities as I am sure it is an act
>>of terrorism to spread terror.
>>
> And so had I.
My advice to you is that you will be causing the police to waste their
time and I will strongly urge the police to press charges against you.
> He appears to have disappeared since the study was published
> though so it's had one beneficial effect already. Back to the dark ages
> with ya Lenny.
I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
else. I think it is you who are behaving in an unreasonable manner with
your threats of banishment and malicious use of the terrorism card.
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de
[snip]
> I have as much right to post scientific information here
> as you or anyone else. I think it is you who are behaving
> in an unreasonable manner with your threats of banishment
> and malicious use of the terrorism card.
The trouble with your "scientific" information Lenny is that precious
little of it is scientific.
> "Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
> news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de
>
> [snip]
>
> > I have as much right to post scientific information here
> > as you or anyone else. I think it is you who are behaving
> > in an unreasonable manner with your threats of banishment
> > and malicious use of the terrorism card.
>
> The trouble with your "scientific" information Lenny is that precious
> little of it is scientific.
sssh....don't mention laser printers to him!
--
[ 7'ism - a condition by which the sufferer experiences an inability
to give concise answers, express reasoned argument or opinion.
Usually accompanied by silly noises and gestures - incurable, early
euthanasia recommended. ]
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de...
> I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
> else. I think it is you who are behaving in an unreasonable manner with
> your threats of banishment and malicious use of the terrorism card.
If you are going to start posting scientific information can you please flag
it so that we can separate it from the garbage you have been posting until
now?
"Bob Eager" <rde42@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-viLPGi2JTddZ@rikki.tavi.co.uk
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:17:56 UTC, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> > "Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
> > news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I have as much right to post scientific information
> > > here as you or anyone else. I think it is you who are
> > > behaving in an unreasonable manner with your threats
> > > of banishment and malicious use of the terrorism card.
> >
> > The trouble with your "scientific" information Lenny is
> > that precious little of it is scientific.
>
> sssh....don't mention laser printers to him!
What, you mean the HP 2605dn colour one I've just bought..?
In message <f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
writes
>I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
>else.
And when you do, I'm sure all the regulars will give you a standing
ovation.
>
In article <P4TLqrC1I8rGFw4T@clintsmc.demon.co.uk>,
Clint Sharp <clint@clintsmc.demon.co.uk> writes:
> In message <f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
> writes
> >I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
> >else.
> And when you do, I'm sure all the regulars will give you a standing
> ovation.
This is all looking rather a lot like Doug, from uk.transport. Lenny, meet
Doug...
--
SAm.
In message <shp5o4-gp8.ln1@nntp.stir.ac.uk>, Sam Nelson
<sam@ssrl.org.uk> writes
>In article <P4TLqrC1I8rGFw4T@clintsmc.demon.co.uk>,
> Clint Sharp <clint@clintsmc.demon.co.uk> writes:
>> In message <f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
>> writes
>> >I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
>> >else.
>> And when you do, I'm sure all the regulars will give you a standing
>> ovation.
>
>This is all looking rather a lot like Doug, from uk.transport. Lenny, meet
>Doug...
Umm, Doug? Not me mate. Google my posting name, it's been around for a
few years and I've never knowingly socked up. Think you'll find I've
never been near uk.transport IIRC. Unless of course you are implying
that Lenny is Doug?
--
Clint Sharp
Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Bob Eager" <rde42@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-viLPGi2JTddZ@rikki.tavi.co.uk
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:17:56 UTC, "Ivor Jones"
>> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
>>> news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> I have as much right to post scientific information
>>>> here as you or anyone else. I think it is you who are
>>>> behaving in an unreasonable manner with your threats
>>>> of banishment and malicious use of the terrorism card.
>>> The trouble with your "scientific" information Lenny is
>>> that precious little of it is scientific.
>> sssh....don't mention laser printers to him!
>
> What, you mean the HP 2605dn colour one I've just bought..?
>
> Ivor
>
>
You're f*cked then in cyan, magenta, yellow and black.
On Jul 31, 10:27 pm, "dennis@home" <den...@killspam.kicks-ass.net>
wrote:
> "Lenny" <le...@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
>
> news:f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> > I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
> > else. I think it is you who are behaving in an unreasonable manner with
> > your threats of banishment and malicious use of the terrorism card.
>
> If you are going to start posting scientific information can you please flag
> it so that we can separate it from the garbage you have been posting until
> now?
On another forum, someone keeps claiming to have posted links to
scientifically-based research
On one site, a report from a homeopath (about treating assumed
hypersensitivity to mobile signals) seems to have disappeared
"andy" <andy.ggrps@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1186011814.057814.14170@l70g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
> On one site, a report from a homeopath (about treating assumed
> hypersensitivity to mobile signals) seems to have disappeared
>
That's easy..
Microwave 100 ml of water until its 99C.
Take one drop and put it in 100 ml of water..
Shake vigorously (most important)..
Repeat 100 times taking one drop of the previous batch and putting it in a
new batch of 100 ml of water..
Now take the 100 ml of water and drink one drop in tea four times a day.
In article <p$xyLvDi$LsGFwVY@clintsmc.demon.co.uk>,
Clint Sharp <clint@clintsmc.demon.co.uk> writes:
> In message <shp5o4-gp8.ln1@nntp.stir.ac.uk>, Sam Nelson
> <sam@ssrl.org.uk> writes
> >In article <P4TLqrC1I8rGFw4T@clintsmc.demon.co.uk>,
> > Clint Sharp <clint@clintsmc.demon.co.uk> writes:
> >> In message <f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
> >> writes
> >> >I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
> >> >else.
> >> And when you do, I'm sure all the regulars will give you a standing
> >> ovation.
> >
> >This is all looking rather a lot like Doug, from uk.transport. Lenny, meet
> >Doug...
> Umm, Doug? Not me mate. Google my posting name, it's been around for a
> few years and I've never knowingly socked up. Think you'll find I've
> never been near uk.transport IIRC. Unless of course you are implying
> that Lenny is Doug?
I didn't mean you, I meant Lenny, yes. Sorry, I thought that was obvious.
I don't intend to imply that Lenny _is_ Doug---but the similarities are
fascinating.
--
SAm.
In message <0me8o4-dnt.ln1@nntp.stir.ac.uk>, Sam Nelson
<sam@ssrl.org.uk> writes
>> >This is all looking rather a lot like Doug, from uk.transport. Lenny, meet
>> >Doug...
>> Umm, Doug? Not me mate. Google my posting name, it's been around for a
>> few years and I've never knowingly socked up. Think you'll find I've
>> never been near uk.transport IIRC. Unless of course you are implying
>> that Lenny is Doug?
>
>I didn't mean you, I meant Lenny, yes. Sorry, I thought that was obvious.
>I don't intend to imply that Lenny _is_ Doug---but the similarities are
>fascinating.
It probably was obvious.. I think I may be electro-sensitive, if I work
in front of my multiple TFT monitors for 14 hours a day I suffer
fatigue, headaches and eye strain, conclusive proof that they are
emitting harmful wavelengths that have a negative effect on my well
being.
--
Clint Sharp
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:13:57 +0100, Clint Sharp wrote:
> In message <f8notl$qqk$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
> writes
>>I have as much right to post scientific information here as you or anyone
>>else.
> And when you do, I'm sure all the regulars will give you a standing
> ovation.
I don't care about you and "the regulars" ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!
I have most of "them" plonked.
No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme. These ARE the right
groups no? I THINK SO.
In article <f8vdev$ni$1@news.datemas.de>,
Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> writes:
> No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
> relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme.
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:54:29 UTC, sam@ssrl.org.uk (Sam Nelson) wrote:
> In article <f8vdev$ni$1@news.datemas.de>,
> Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> writes:
> > No, I just post interesting
Not interesting
> > factual
Fictional, more like
> > and science based
Pseudo based
> > information
> > relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme.
>
> When does that start?
>
> > These ARE the right
> > groups no? I THINK SO.
>
> Are you a vegan, by any chance?
He's probably a fruitarian.
(actually, that probably explains why he's a fruit cake)
--
[ 7'ism - a condition by which the sufferer experiences an inability
to give concise answers, express reasoned argument or opinion.
Usually accompanied by silly noises and gestures - incurable, early
euthanasia recommended. ]
In message <f8vdev$ni$1@news.datemas.de>, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
writes
>I don't care about you and "the regulars" ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!
>
>I have most of "them" plonked.
>
>No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
>relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme. These ARE the right
>groups no? I THINK SO.
Are you actually going to get the message that nobody wants this pseudo
science you post, most of it is so shoddy, biased or just totally
unscientific that it's laughable. If there truly is an issue with WiFi
then post some research that's independent, not from someone trying to
sell a magic bullet cure for the problem or is just peer reviewed and up
to the accepted scientific standards. You are wrong about these being
the right groups as well, but I guess you did your research as well as
the people who publish the 'scientific' papers you punt as factual.
>
>bye.
I'm not going anywhere so I can only guess that you're leaving, please
don't be offended if we kick the door so it hits your arse on the way
out. Oh, before you go, can you post the information that you've been
asked for so many times, proof of your involvement in scientific
research. Thanks.
>
>
>
In message <176uZD2KcidF-pn2-wqP6GPtpRDTt@rikki.tavi.co.uk>, Bob Eager
<rde42@spamcop.net> writes
>He's probably a fruitarian.
Shame he's not a breatheairian
>
>(actually, that probably explains why he's a fruit cake)
>
Re: Say No to Lenny.... 
Linear Mode
