skype on three

Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it
........?

It's OK .......I just read about it..sounds like a bad deal...I'll stick
to my Belkin Wi Fi phone .....

Jim GM4DHJ presented the following explanation :
> Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it
> .......?

Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does
not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on
the person's name it makes a normal phone call to the Skype servers,
you still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G.

"Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:CpiEh.38720$Fm2.31554@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
> It's OK .......I just read about it..sounds like a bad deal...I'll stick
> to my Belkin Wi Fi phone .....
>

People want economy and they will pay any price to get it.
Lee Iacocca

> Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does
> not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on
> the person's name it makes a normal phone call to the Skype servers, you
> still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G.
>
>

pants....but thanks anyway.....

its far from "pants" the quality is exceptional.

"Jim GM4DHJ" <jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:dmnEh.27070$OK6.23912@newsfe4-win.ntli.net...
>
>> Can't say I have used it much but when I have it works fine. It does
>> not actually use the data path to carry conversation. When you click on the person's name it makes a normal phone
>> call to the Skype servers, you still get the call free, this means it works on 2G as well as 3G.
>>
>>
>
> pants....but thanks anyway.....
>

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:38:47 GMT, "Jim GM4DHJ"
<jim.gm4dhjt@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>Would anybody recommend skype on three and the Nokia phone that goes with it

Is this the twerp who reckons that 1800MHz is useless because it is
much higher frequency than 900MHz?

If so, why on earth would you think of using 2100MHz instead?

If not, be aware that you're being confused with the aforementioned
twerp.

--

Iain
the out-of-date hairydog guide to mobile phones
http://www.hairydog.co.uk/cell1.html
Browse now while stocks last!

> Is this the twerp who reckons that 1800MHz is useless because it is
> much higher frequency than 900MHz?
>
> If so, why on earth would you think of using 2100MHz instead?
>
> If not, be aware that you're being confused with the aforementioned
> twerp.

That is me..... 2100Mhz well, it will be just as bad as 1800Mhz
then.......

signed

Twerp