On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:37:51 GMT, "Jon" <NoSpam@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>We have been trialling using Skype for our homeworkers who make a lot of
>short calls.
>
>It works reasonably well and the Skype toolbar which allows us to click on
>any phone number displayed in Internet Explorer and automatically dial it is
>invaluable. We would not want to lose this facility.
Go for SIP VOIP and forget about Skype. Come on :-) this is for
business.
With SIP you can choose to have a softphone on the computer (say
x-lite for example), or, alternaitvely, issue an ATA to each worker,
to which you hold the passwords etc. They would then simply plug that
ATA into their system and connect an ordinary phone to it - no
computer needs to be switched on ( you might find that an advantage).
If you do the ATA route do make absolutely sure that you are buying
unlocked ones - i.e. ones that are NOT locked to one particular
operator. This is essential if you want to freedom to move operators
in the future. If you are worried about anyone walking away with an
ATA you could always set deposit on it. Some ATAs will connect between
a broadband modem and a computer. Most, though, connect to a router.
Info:
www.voip-info.org
this forum and
www.voxilla.org
>
>However the facilities to manage the accounts is very poor. For example,
>whilst we can allocate money to a central account which then tops each
>homeworker's individual account, once this money has gone out it cannot be
>reclaimed. Also we wish to regularly download the call logs of each
>homeworker, which means having to do this for each individual account.
I would think that if you used SIP VOIP that you could make an
arrangement with them to have one financial account with a multiple of
SIP addresses. I am not familiar with business rates so can't advise
specifically but you could check out:-
voipfone.co.uk
voiptalk.org
voip.co.uk
and gradwell.co.uk though there is a monthly fee.
There are lots more but with variable reliability.
>
>Cost is important (all calls are to UK landlines). A monthly fee that
>allowed unlimited calls might be cost effective.
>
>I would welcome any suggestions.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jon
>
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.