Hi,
we as a company have just started utilising this technology as part of
an ongoing project to reduce costs on comms and embrace new technologies
[leading not bleeding edge].
We spent quite a while trying out some different providers and the one
we are with now is great so thought I would share it with this group.
Take a look at www.voicehost.co.uk and see what you think. Some nice
features and their support people are very helpful and quick to respond.
Phil Collin wrote:
> Hi,
> we as a company have just started utilising this technology as part of
> an ongoing project to reduce costs on comms and embrace new technologies
> [leading not bleeding edge].
> We spent quite a while trying out some different providers and the one
> we are with now is great so thought I would share it with this group.
> Take a look at www.spamspamspam.co.uk and see what you think. Some nice
> features and their support people are very helpful and quick to respond.
Typical isn't it? You spent ages trying out all those different
providers before settling on one that's based in the same building as
you. What a coincidence.
"elziko" <elziko@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:EuSQg.23045$r61.4380@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk
> M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> > Skype is the worst of the worst even worse than Sipgate
> > and that 's really saying something .
>
> Whats wrong with Sipgate?
Ron has a bee in his bonnet about them. Nobody really seems to know why.
(Cue Ron with all sorts of pathetic excuses...)
Thus spaketh me@privacy.net:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:17 +0100, Phil Collin
> <phil.collin@datametrics.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> we as a company have just started utilising this technology as part
>> of an ongoing project to reduce costs on comms and embrace new
>> technologies [leading not bleeding edge].
>> We spent quite a while trying out some different providers and the
>> one we are with now is great so thought I would share it with this
>> group. Take a look at www.voicehost.co.uk and see what you think.
>> Some nice features and their support people are very helpful and
>> quick to respond.
>>
>> Phil.
>
> No thanks
> Skype at www.skype.co.uk is far superior
And they were the worst around, so if Skype is superior than voicehost,
voicehost must be really bad, and therefore moves Skype into being 2nd
worst provider.
>On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:17 +0100, Phil Collin
><phil.collin@datametrics.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>we as a company have just started utilising this technology as part of
>>an ongoing project to reduce costs on comms and embrace new technologies
>>[leading not bleeding edge].
>>We spent quite a while trying out some different providers and the one
>>we are with now is great so thought I would share it with this group.
>>Take a look at www.voicehost.co.uk and see what you think. Some nice
>>features and their support people are very helpful and quick to respond.
>>
>>Phil.
>Watch out Ivor will be about and telling you no adds are allowed here
>personally I am not bothered in the least the more the merrier come
>one come all .
I can't see anything wrong with someone announcing a new service, on a
single occasion, providing they are upfront about it and don't
pretend to be a punter who has just found a site.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
>>> features and their support people are very helpful and quick to respond.
<<<SPACE
>> Watch out Ivor will be about and telling you no adds are allowed here
>> personally I am not bothered in the least the more the merrier come
>> one come all .
<<<SPACE
> I can't see anything wrong with someone announcing a new service, on a
> single occasion, providing they are upfront about it and don't
> pretend to be a punter who has just found a site.
I agree. A bit silly to pretend to be a punter, I think.
I would not object to a brief indication of a new service, from the
provider. After all, no-one jumped on Peter Gradwell when he announced
his BT number Porting Service etc.
"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.b54d7d6902971436.48968@blueyonder.invalid
[snip]
> I would not object to a brief indication of a new
> service, from the provider. After all, no-one jumped on
> Peter Gradwell when he announced his BT number Porting
> Service etc.
I don't object to a genuine info message, the trouble is most of them are
thinly disguised spam/affiliate links.
<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jin8h25k8gaega5i0517e9scrfalqpu0n8@4ax.com
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:27:04 GMT, Brian A
> <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I can't see anything wrong with someone announcing a
> > new service, on a single occasion, providing they are
> > upfront about it and don't pretend to be a punter who
> > has just found a site.
> > Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
> You can't I can't but you can bet your life Ivor will
> have something to say about it hell mentioning any other
> provider except sip sip sip not I can't type the full
> name I have just had supper and I would throw up if I did
> !!!!!!! .
With a bit of luck you'll throw up over your keyboard then we might get a
bit of a rest from you for a while.
The only thing I have anything to say about is you continually
complaining, Ron. When are you going to get it through your thick head
nobody here takes you seriously..?
<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4eu7h2hf5t5hk2tho2l39tuvg24cpr6o7l@4ax.com
[snip]
> No its plonkers like you who continue to put with a
> shabby service from Sipgate because you are to tight to
> spend a bob or two on a decent service that are the
> plonkers not me .
The only flaw in your argument is that my service is anything but shabby.
The only shabby thing around here is you.
<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:l929h2dqr62s1qi96eqlmr6deq96b3qhjo@4ax.com
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:54:46 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> > The only flaw in your argument is that my service is
> > anything but shabby.
FFS put a bloody space in, Ron..!
> Name me just ONE provider Ivor that buggers of on a
> Friday afternoon and leaves the whole service to look
> after itself until the following Monday afternoon and
> not giving a toss about its customers .
You have no idea what you are talking about in relation to that alleged
incident.
> They will never be forgiven for that act of gross
> negligence NEVER Adolf would have had the lot of them
> stud up against a wall and shot for what they did had he
> still been around.
I invoke Godwin's Law and declare you have totally lost the plot as well
as the argument.
<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:k57gh2917r3onoe4fphscbvguavcqv80sa@4ax.com...
> Please stop telling others what to do and not what to do Ivor if I
> don't want to leave a space I wont ,I can see I am going to have to
> get a friend of mine to flood this group with SPAM I know you like it
>
Do you think that threatening to flood a group with spam, just because
you cannot agree with one person that posts on that group, is acceptable
behaviour?
If you want to have childish tantrums, join a nursery.
Great new VoIP provider 
Linear Mode
