GROUND BREAKING NEW VOIP SERVICE---choose from over 2 million UK numbers!

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45dcb7b5.0@entanet
> fa103 wrote:
> [snip]
> > hence posting in this forum.
>
> Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.

Don't you start, it's bad enough with Dexter..!

(and this newsgroup still is not a forum...)

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:45dcb7b5.0@entanet
>> fa103 wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> hence posting in this forum.
>> Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.
>
> Don't you start, it's bad enough with Dexter..!
>
> (and this newsgroup still is not a forum...)

Of course it is, for any reasonable definition of "forum". That you
cannot read an English dictionary does not change the facts.

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
message news:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> fa103 wrote:
>>
>> Dear Desk Rabbit,
>>
>> Your comments have not provoked or upset me in anyway. We deal with
>> users like yourself on a day to day basis, with over 100 paying
>> customers on launch our service is not meerly a "me too" VoIP
>> company,
>> we are a revolutionary product. Lastly, your comments have been very
>> much appreciated by myself and the team. We thought it important to
>> communicate with the user directly, hence posting in this forum. We
>> have recieved many suggestions some positive and some negative and
>> aim
>> to strengthen our foundations at Connexin.
>>
>> Hope you all the best
>>
>> F
>
> Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything revolutionary.

Well it's got the same old spin.

On 19 Feb 2007 20:38:11 -0800, "fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk>
wrote:

>A brand new UK broadband service "Connexin" has been launched.


http://www.connexin.co.uk/contactus.htm

Email & phone contact details only



Domain name: connexin.co.uk

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
their address omitted from the WHOIS service


Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?

On Feb 22, 9:29 am, MathMan <math...@scientist.com> wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2007 20:38:11 -0800, "fa103" <f.alam...@connexin.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >A brand new UK broadband service "Connexin" has been launched.
>
> http://www.connexin.co.uk/contactus.htm
>
> Email & phone contact details only
>
> Domain name: connexin.co.uk
>
> Registrant's address:
> The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
> their address omitted from the WHOIS service
>
> Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?

That must be an error on their system. Our company Address is written
very clearly on the governments companies house website. As well as on
www.connexin.co.uk

Regards,

F

On Feb 21, 7:47 pm, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in messagenews:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyond er.co.uk
>
> [snip]
>
> > Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything
> > revolutionary.
>
> He's revolutionary in the sheer level of spam created in the space of less
> than 48 hours. Even Skype hasn't managed that.
>
> Ivor

Ivor,

Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming it is
yourself. This group was started to help educate those who wish to
learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion group. Your Useless messages
are the only spam in here. So unless you have a question, kindly stop
posting here.

Regards

F

You say that there is a choice of 2 Million numbers. Does that mean
that if I request a number a little further up the list of numbers for
a particular area code youy will be able to release it?

"fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1172150036.686580.77080@p10g2000cwp.googlegro ups.com

[snip]

> Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming
> it is yourself. This group was started to help educate
> those who wish to learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion
> group. Your Useless messages are the only spam in here.
> So unless you have a question, kindly stop posting here.

I have a question - when are you going to stop spamming this group..? And
as for what this group was started for, I know *exactly* what it was
started for, because I started it. So don't tell me not to complain about
spammers, which you *ARE*. Now kindly go away.

Ivor

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45dce6ff.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
> > "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:45dcb7b5.0@entanet
> > > fa103 wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > hence posting in this forum.
> > > Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.
> >
> > Don't you start, it's bad enough with Dexter..!
> >
> > (and this newsgroup still is not a forum...)
>
> Of course it is, for any reasonable definition of
> "forum". That you cannot read an English dictionary does
> not change the facts.

Sigh..

A forum is a web based group. This *newsgroup* is not hosted on a web
server.

Ivor

fa103 wrote:
> On Feb 21, 7:47 pm, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
>> wrote in messagenews:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyond er.co.uk
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything
>>> revolutionary.
>>
>> He's revolutionary in the sheer level of spam created in the space
>> of less than 48 hours. Even Skype hasn't managed that.
>>
>> Ivor
>
> Ivor,
>
> Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming it is
> yourself. This group was started to help educate those who wish to
> learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion group. Your Useless messages
> are the only spam in here. So unless you have a question, kindly stop
> posting here.
>
> Regards
>
> F

LOL

It was Ivor who started the group!

You're a simpleton. You have no understanding of the word SPAM, your
VoIP service is very poor, now just go away.

On Feb 22, 3:34 pm, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
> "fa103" <f.alam...@connexin.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1172150036.686580.77080@p10g2000cwp.googlegro ups.com
>
> [snip]
>
> > Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming
> > it is yourself. This group was started to help educate
> > those who wish to learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion
> > group. Your Useless messages are the only spam in here.
> > So unless you have a question, kindly stop posting here.
>
> I have a question - when are you going to stop spamming this group..? And
> as for what this group was started for, I know *exactly* what it was
> started for, because I started it. So don't tell me not to complain about
> spammers, which you *ARE*. Now kindly go away.
>
> Ivor

This posting was started by myself. Its for those who want to know
more about VoIP in the Uk.

F

JCH wrote:
> You say that there is a choice of 2 Million numbers. Does that mean
> that if I request a number a little further up the list of numbers for
> a particular area code youy will be able to release it?
>
Try talking to the right person.

MathMan wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2007 20:38:11 -0800, "fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> A brand new UK broadband service "Connexin" has been launched.
>
>
> http://www.connexin.co.uk/contactus.htm
>
> Email & phone contact details only
>
>
>
> Domain name: connexin.co.uk
>
> Registrant's address:
> The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
> their address omitted from the WHOIS service
>
>
> Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?
>
That actually breaks Nominet rules as it is obviously a commercial site.

fa103 wrote:
> On Feb 22, 3:34 pm, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>> "fa103" <f.alam...@connexin.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1172150036.686580.77080@p10g2000cwp.googlegro ups.com
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming
>>> it is yourself. This group was started to help educate
>>> those who wish to learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion
>>> group. Your Useless messages are the only spam in here.
>>> So unless you have a question, kindly stop posting here.
>>
>> I have a question - when are you going to stop spamming this
>> group..? And as for what this group was started for, I know
>> *exactly* what it was started for, because I started it. So don't
>> tell me not to complain about spammers, which you *ARE*. Now kindly
>> go away.
>>
>> Ivor
>
> This posting was started by myself. Its for those who want to know
> more about VoIP in the Uk.
>
> F

No it was all about spamming.

I gave your service a try, but there are many other better services out
there.

Your service has nothing extra to offer, just a poorer service.

On 2007-02-22, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

> "fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1172150036.686580.77080@p10g2000cwp.googlegro ups.com
>
> [snip]
>
>> Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming it is
>> yourself. This group was started to help educate those who wish to
>> learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion group. Your Useless messages
>> are the only spam in here. So unless you have a question, kindly
>> stop posting here.
>
> I have a question - when are you going to stop spamming this group..?

At the same time he tells you when he stopped beating his wife.

> And as for what this group was started for, I know *exactly* what it
> was started for, because I started it.

Have you considered putting that in a signature? It would be a constant
reminder to us of your benevolence.

> So don't tell me not to
> complain about spammers, which you *ARE*. Now kindly go away.

I saw only one announcement from him in this group. Were there others?

Brian.

On 2007-02-22, {{{{{Welcome}}}}} <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> fa103 wrote:

>> This posting was started by myself. Its for those who want to know
>> more about VoIP in the Uk.
>>
>> F
>
> No it was all about spamming.

In what sense was it spam?

> I gave your service a try, but there are many other better services out
> there.
>
> Your service has nothing extra to offer, just a poorer service.

That's a different issue.

Brian.

<J.Clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:384st259rl0ja0noc4cekjcsnonmk6oa96@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:14:00 GMT, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
> <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>It was Ivor who started the group!
> Yes so are we all supposed to bow down and kiss the damn bull ring or
> sonething every time we go near anywhere near Birmingham or does Ivor
> want a medal or something .Ivor is about the only person that has
> started a group that is forever telling everyone that he started the
> group .
>

Doesn't the fact that you have had to change your identity to overcome
being in most people's 'Blocked Senders' list tell you anything?

On 22 Feb 2007 05:10:33 -0800, "fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk>
wrote:

>> Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?

>Our company Address is written
>very clearly on the governments companies house website.

Company No. 05823408, 6 Silver Street, Hull

Dutton Moore. Your accountants
(http://www.griffincharteredaccountan...uk/contact.asp)


> As well as on www.connexin.co.uk

Connexin Limited, Suite 23, 28 Old Brompton Road, Kensington

Anonymous rented mailbox
(http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/directory/1257/5052.php)


So I ask again, why are connexin hiding their *trading* address from
their customers?

In message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007, writes
>On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:14:00 GMT, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
><bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>It was Ivor who started the group!
> Yes so are we all supposed to bow down and kiss the damn bull ring or
>sonething every time we go near anywhere near Birmingham or does Ivor
>want a medal or something .Ivor is about the only person that has
>started a group that is forever telling everyone that he started the
>group .
>

I have Dexter blocked in my system. The above sounds very much like
Dexter to me. Has he changed his name?

David Floyd wrote:
> In message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007, writes
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:14:00 GMT, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
>> <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It was Ivor who started the group!
>> Yes so are we all supposed to bow down and kiss the damn bull ring or
>> sonething every time we go near anywhere near Birmingham or does Ivor
>> want a medal or something .Ivor is about the only person that has
>> started a group that is forever telling everyone that he started the
>> group .
>>
>
> I have Dexter blocked in my system. The above sounds very much like
> Dexter to me. Has he changed his name?


It is he, that he has.

"David Floyd" <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote in message
news:pYFEX0A4vq3FFwSr@127.0.0.1...
> In message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007, writes
>>On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:14:00 GMT, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
>><bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It was Ivor who started the group!
>> Yes so are we all supposed to bow down and kiss the damn bull ring or
>>sonething every time we go near anywhere near Birmingham or does Ivor
>>want a medal or something .Ivor is about the only person that has
>>started a group that is forever telling everyone that he started the
>>group .
>>
>
> I have Dexter blocked in my system. The above sounds very much like
> Dexter to me. Has he changed his name?

Yes he has, and he will have to change it again before I will see any
more of his posts, his new identity has now been blocked

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k
>
> [snip]
>
>> Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything
>> revolutionary.
>
> He's revolutionary in the sheer level of spam created in the space of
> less than 48 hours. Even Skype hasn't managed that.
>
> Ivor


Good job I used a throw away email address, they even sell your email
address on for spam.

<J.Clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:bs3st2pa9356362ho6mo8npl1b7o8kroke@4ax.com
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:45:21 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> > If I do, I will have no option but
> > to killfile you.
>
> And just what may I ask do you hope to archive by doing
> that Ivor ?.
> > Announcing a usable service is one thing, spamming is
> > something entirely different and you are verging on the
> > latter.
>
> So get on with life and don't read his posts these's a
> good chap .

Ok, so don't you read any posts with the word Sipgate in them and it's a
deal.

Ivor

I suspect they wont be trading for long.

Their website is full of dead links!

J.Clavox@btinternet.com wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:45:21 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>> If I do, I will have no option but to killfile you.
>
> And just what may I ask do you hope to archive by doing that Ivor ?.
[snip]
> So get on with life and don't read his posts these's a good chap .

Er....

J.Clavox@btinternet.com wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:35:08 GMT, "Harry Stottle"
> <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote:
>> Yes he has, and he will have to change it again before I will see any
>> more of his posts, his new identity has now been blocked
>
> I am so pleased and personally I just could not care less this group
> is shit now anyway .

Bye then.

Ivor Jones wrote:
> A forum is a web based group.

Only according to the magic dictionary of Ivor. The dictionaries I have
available to check list no such definition.

Can you please point me in the direction of your dictionary, or
otherwise any other dictionary which contains the above definition?

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45df9dee.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
> > A forum is a web based group.
>
> Only according to the magic dictionary of Ivor. The
> dictionaries I have available to check list no such
> definition.

By convention not dictionary definition.

> Can you please point me in the direction of your
> dictionary, or otherwise any other dictionary which
> contains the above definition?

See above.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:45df9dee.0@entanet
>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>> A forum is a web based group.
>> Only according to the magic dictionary of Ivor. The
>> dictionaries I have available to check list no such
>> definition.
>
> By convention not dictionary definition.

Sorry Ivor, but I just cannot agree with you here. A "web forum" is a
web based group. A "forum" is just a forum. You cannot even claim
context, as this discussion is not occuring on the "web".

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45e01ead.0@entanet

[snip]

> Sorry Ivor, but I just cannot agree with you here. A "web
> forum" is a web based group. A "forum" is just a forum.
> You cannot even claim context, as this discussion is not
> occuring on the "web".

Agree or not, as you choose. Doesn't change the *fact* that this group is
not a forum. I'm sorry to harp on about the fact that I got this group
created, but I did and I didn't create a forum, I created a newsgroup.

Ivor