Kids Eye View About To Come Alive!

INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY!
Fork It Over!

a Ground Floor
Unique Dimension & Concept
In the
Children's Entertainment Market...
For More information
http://www.kidseyeview.us

"jmgconsultants" <kidseyeview.us_jmg@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:1159751869.934754.92720@m7g2000cwm.googlegrou ps.com
> INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY!

Please don't spam.

Cue Mr. Chew telling me what not to do........


Ivor

<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:b97bi29ihqm5vj2l0c4nretvn0af34ek61@4ax.com
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:38:20 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

> > "jmgconsultants" <kidseyeview.us_jmg@yahoo.com> wrote in
>
> Carry on spamming mate I don't mind

Well now doesn't that say it all.

> unlike Ivor I know
> how to use a kill file if I don't want to read your posts
> in the kill file you go .

I know how to use a killfile but as you very well know it is of little use
in stopping spammers.

> It is a very simple procedure
> actually Ivor you should learn how to do it .

So why don't you killfile me then..? I do so wish you would..!

Ivor

M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:38:20 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>> "jmgconsultants" <kidseyeview.us_jmg@yahoo.com> wrote in
>
> Carry on spamming mate I don't mind unlike Ivor I know how to use a
> kill file if I don't want to read your posts in the kill file you go .
> It is a very simple procedure actually Ivor you should learn how to do
> it .

You really are a complete and utter plonker. Tolerating
every tom dick and harry spamming news groups would end up
in their demise. Why not check it out with your clueless
spam tolerant ISP, one of the few if not the only UK ISP to
have been the subject of a UDP.

Continually calling Ivor a "net cop" and insulting him makes
you look like an overexcited untrained puppy that yaps and
urinates at the same time.

Richard H Huelin wrote:
> M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:38:20 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
>> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "jmgconsultants" <kidseyeview.us_jmg@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>
>>
>> Carry on spamming mate I don't mind unlike Ivor I know how to use a
>> kill file if I don't want to read your posts in the kill file you go .
>> It is a very simple procedure actually Ivor you should learn how to do
>> it .
>
>
> You really are a complete and utter plonker. Tolerating every tom dick
> and harry spamming news groups would end up in their demise. Why not
> check it out with your clueless spam tolerant ISP, one of the few if not
> the only UK ISP to have been the subject of a UDP.
>
> Continually calling Ivor a "net cop" and insulting him makes you look
> like an overexcited untrained puppy that yaps and urinates at the same
> time.

I hate newsgroup spam as much as the next person but, anyone who thinks
that posting a "please go away - don't spam here" message in the
newsgroup is going to stop it is pissing in the wind.

1. The spammer doesn't care
2. The spammer doesn't even read this group
3. The spammers bot doesn't care
4. The spammers bot doesn't even read this group
5. The user of a compromised machine doesn't care
6. The user of a compromised machine doesn't even read this group
7. The spammer who compromised the machine doesn't care
8. The bot running on the compromised machine doesn't care
9. etc. etc. etc.

What is needed is a way of blacklisting and whitelisting or an
"invitation only" system. I'd ban anonynmous remailers completely as
these are often used by abusive users to start or perpetuate flame wars.
Newsgroups would be much more civil places if we knew for certain who
was who.

"Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
news:mJWdnd6XGszZHLfYnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@pipex.net

[snip]

> What is needed is a way of blacklisting and whitelisting
> or an "invitation only" system. I'd ban anonynmous
> remailers completely as these are often used by abusive
> users to start or perpetuate flame wars. Newsgroups would
> be much more civil places if we knew for certain who was
> who.

Ok, who is "Desk Rabbit" then..? I'm pretty sure it's not the name on your
birth certificate.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:mJWdnd6XGszZHLfYnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@pipex.net
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>What is needed is a way of blacklisting and whitelisting
>>or an "invitation only" system. I'd ban anonynmous
>>remailers completely as these are often used by abusive
>>users to start or perpetuate flame wars. Newsgroups would
>>be much more civil places if we knew for certain who was
>>who.
>
>
> Ok, who is "Desk Rabbit" then..? I'm pretty sure it's not the name on your
> birth certificate.
>
> Ivor
>
>

Mr & Mrs Rabbit will be most upset to hear that.

You see what you need is a forum... a moderated forum <cough
cough>, and all these problems go away!

Wink Wink. I jest.
---
External Post from http://ukvoiptalk.com

"Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
news:OfqdnXa2gcPDUbHYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@pipex.net
> Ivor Jones wrote:
> > "Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
> > news:mJWdnd6XGszZHLfYnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@pipex.net
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > What is needed is a way of blacklisting and
> > > whitelisting or an "invitation only" system. I'd ban
> > > anonynmous remailers completely as these are often
> > > used by abusive users to start or perpetuate flame
> > > wars. Newsgroups would be much more civil places if
> > > we knew for certain who was who.
> >
> > Ok, who is "Desk Rabbit" then..? I'm pretty sure it's
> > not the name on your birth certificate.
>
> Mr & Mrs Rabbit will be most upset to hear that.

In that case I want to know why they called you "Desk" - what sort of a
name is that..?!

Ivor

"mattpark" <admin@ukvoiptalk-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote
in message news:1160572080.191085@ntop.griffin.com
> You see what you need is a forum... a moderated forum
> <cough cough>, and all these problems go away!
>
> Wink Wink. I jest.

I agree with you, but you can't make a group moderated retrospectively, so
we're stuck with it as it is.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:OfqdnXa2gcPDUbHYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@pipex.net
>
>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>
>>>"Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mJWdnd6XGszZHLfYnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@pipex.n et
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>>What is needed is a way of blacklisting and
>>>>whitelisting or an "invitation only" system. I'd ban
>>>>anonynmous remailers completely as these are often
>>>>used by abusive users to start or perpetuate flame
>>>>wars. Newsgroups would be much more civil places if
>>>>we knew for certain who was who.
>>>
>>>Ok, who is "Desk Rabbit" then..? I'm pretty sure it's
>>>not the name on your birth certificate.
>>
>>Mr & Mrs Rabbit will be most upset to hear that.
>
>
> In that case I want to know why they called you "Desk" - what sort of a
> name is that..?!
>
> Ivor
>
>
Its Russian. Short form of Dostoevsky

Ivor Jones brought next idea :
> "mattpark" <admin@ukvoiptalk-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote
> in message news:1160572080.191085@ntop.griffin.com
>> You see what you need is a forum... a moderated forum
>> <cough cough>, and all these problems go away!
>>
>> Wink Wink. I jest.
>
> I agree with you, but you can't make a group moderated retrospectively, so
> we're stuck with it as it is.
>
> Ivor

I wouldn't fancy being the moderator!

"Desk Rabbit" <no-spam@example.com> wrote in message
news:icmdnRhRVIdUsbDYRVnyiA@pipex.net
> Ivor Jones wrote:

[snip]

> > > > Ok, who is "Desk Rabbit" then..? I'm pretty sure
> > > > it's not the name on your birth certificate.
> > >
> > > Mr & Mrs Rabbit will be most upset to hear that.
> >
> >
> > In that case I want to know why they called you "Desk"
> > - what sort of a name is that..?!
>
> Its Russian. Short form of Dostoevsky

Dostoevsky Rabbit is just as bad if you ask me..!

Ivor

"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.5c6d7d6a677f3b93.48968@blueyonder.invalid
> Ivor Jones brought next idea :
> > "mattpark" <admin@ukvoiptalk-dot-com.no-spam.invalid>
> > wrote in message news:1160572080.191085@ntop.griffin.com
> > > You see what you need is a forum... a moderated forum
> > > <cough cough>, and all these problems go away!
> > >
> > > Wink Wink. I jest.
> >
> > I agree with you, but you can't make a group moderated
> > retrospectively, so we're stuck with it as it is.
> >
> > Ivor
>
> I wouldn't fancy being the moderator!

Oh I don't know, there would be a certain satisfaction in sending the
ramblings of Dexter to the bit bucket ;-)

(Stand by for cries of "censor"..!!)

Ivor

<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cfjqi21l7tmbtueo188dplc2cida91r2ei@4ax.com
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:01:09 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

[snip]

> > Dostoevsky Rabbit is just as bad if you ask me..!
> >
> > Ivor
> >
> Does it really matter Ivor ?

It matters about as much as you do.

Ivor

<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:k4vqi2d9op6848aijsji922fuq1n5qooai@4ax.com
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:07:46 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Well at least I have got plenty of free calls to use like
> many people here although you seem to think that free
> calls don't exist .

I didn't write that, don't misquote. Although "free" calls don't exist if
you've got to pay to get them..!

> I see that Sipgate are still as incompetent as ever at
> providing a phone service so a neighbour of mine who
> went against my good advice and signed up with Sipgate
> told me earlier . It would seem his sip id and sip
> password where not showing on his account and it took the
> sending of three emails to get it sorted . had it been
> Vonage or Voiphone and a few others besides it would
> have been sorted by telephone in less than a couple of
> minutes. But there again that sort of situation never
> arises with decent and competent providers .

It's never arisen with me or any of the many people I know who use
Sipgate, either.

> He did apologize to me for not believing what I had told
> him regarding Sipgate however .

Well I can't comment on individual cases as they say as I don't know the
details, so I'm not going to bite on this one, sorry Ron.

Ivor

<M.Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:k4vqi2d9op6848aijsji922fuq1n5qooai@4ax.com
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:07:46 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Well at least I have got plenty of free calls to use like
> many people here although you seem to think that free
> calls don't exist .

I didn't write that, don't misquote. Although "free" calls don't exist if
you've got to pay to get them..!

> I see that Sipgate are still as incompetent as ever at
> providing a phone service so a neighbour of mine who
> went against my good advice and signed up with Sipgate
> told me earlier . It would seem his sip id and sip
> password where not showing on his account and it took the
> sending of three emails to get it sorted . had it been
> Vonage or Voiphone and a few others besides it would
> have been sorted by telephone in less than a couple of
> minutes. But there again that sort of situation never
> arises with decent and competent providers .

It's never arisen with me or any of the many people I know who use
Sipgate, either.

> He did apologize to me for not believing what I had told
> him regarding Sipgate however .

Well I can't comment on individual cases as they say as I don't know the
details, so I'm not going to bite on this one, sorry Ron.

Ivor