Make Free Voip Phone Calls Worldwide including India

Make Free Pc to Phone Calls

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a protocol optimized for the
transmission of voice through the Internet or other packet switched
networks.
This Technology (VOIP) has made possible to Make Free Phone Calls
Worldwide. Free Pc to Phone Calls, Phone to Phone Calls, Web activated
phone calls.
Through VOIP Softwares and applications, one can make phone calls.

A new blog containing all the information and offers in VOIP
technilogy.
You can Make Free Unlimited Phone Calls
Even Free Calls to countries like India and Pakistan with 50 other
destinations..!!


One of the Post is - about IBIBO includes You all are aware of a new
blog service called ibibo, its very similar to blogger. ibibo has
started a free service through which registered members can call each
other for free. Looks very similar to Jaxtr

They are currently offering 10 mins free call to other registered
users with maximum 2mins for one call; that makes up to maximum of 5
calls monthly, free!! (Don't get upset by this figure, we'll come up
with a hack at the end!! :-)

If you like reading more
Check them at-

http://voipapplication.blogspot.com/




* Please don't consider it as spam. Keep your phone bills zero.

<rajat.bhatia1721@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c1594daf-4154-4ef3-a58b-af61a2d4d992@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com
: : Make Free Pc to Phone Calls

No thanks, I'd rather use a telephone.
: :
: : Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a protocol
: : optimized for the transmission of voice through the
: : Internet or other packet switched networks.

I know, this is a VoIP group.

: : This Technology (VOIP) has made possible to Make Free
: : Phone Calls Worldwide. Free Pc to Phone Calls, Phone to
: : Phone Calls, Web activated phone calls.

You don't say.

: : Through VOIP Softwares and applications, one can make
: : phone calls.

You don't say..!!

[more spam snipped]

Go away and play with Ron Chew, he likes spammers.

Ivor

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jeguq3572ud6gaa07ajhg4u7cva8mhb9k2@4ax.com
: : On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:37:19 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
: : <ivor@thisaddressis.invalid> wrote:
: : :
: : : Go away and play with Ron Chew, he likes spammers.
: :
: : Please tell me where I have said I like spammers Ivor
: : what I have said is they just do not bother me has I
: : totally ignore them and don't rant and rave here and
: : elsewhere like a demented fool about spammers like you
: : do there is a big difference.

Pity you don't ignore me.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
>
>
> <mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:jeguq3572ud6gaa07ajhg4u7cva8mhb9k2@4ax.com : : On Sun, 10 Feb 2008
> 16:37:19 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
> : : <ivor@thisaddressis.invalid> wrote:
> : : : : : : Go away and play with Ron Chew, he likes spammers.
> : : : : Please tell me where I have said I like spammers Ivor
> : : what I have said is they just do not bother me has I
> : : totally ignore them and don't rant and rave here and
> : : elsewhere like a demented fool about spammers like you
> : : do there is a big difference.
> Pity you don't ignore me.

Pity you can't ignore the spammers like the rest of us instead of
talking to robotic mailers that will never see your reply. So you just
waste bandwidth and make their messages stand out by having these dumb
threads dangling beneath them. Give it up, you are pissing into a gale
force 10.

"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
news:3_SdnVVvmKVzhC3anZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@pipex.net...
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>> Pity you don't ignore me.
>
> Pity you can't ignore the spammers like the rest of us instead of talking
> to robotic mailers that will never see your reply. So you just waste
> bandwidth and make their messages stand out by having these dumb threads
> dangling beneath them. Give it up, you are pissing into a gale force 10.

NO!!!!! I can't just sit quietly and read this.

A gale's a Force 8.. 10 is Storm Force...

cybuerke wrote:
> "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:3_SdnVVvmKVzhC3anZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@pipex.net...
>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>> Pity you don't ignore me.
>> Pity you can't ignore the spammers like the rest of us instead of talking
>> to robotic mailers that will never see your reply. So you just waste
>> bandwidth and make their messages stand out by having these dumb threads
>> dangling beneath them. Give it up, you are pissing into a gale force 10.
>
> NO!!!!! I can't just sit quietly and read this.
>
> A gale's a Force 8.. 10 is Storm Force...
>
>
I'd say either is correct as 10 is somewhere between the two. I believe
the Met office would call it gale force 10. Can't find a reference at
the moment though as the largest they are reporting is gale force 9 in
Trafalgar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufor...e_modern_scale

"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
news:CKednRhSEY8BGizanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
> cybuerke wrote:

>> NO!!!!! I can't just sit quietly and read this.
>>
>> A gale's a Force 8.. 10 is Storm Force...
> I'd say either is correct as 10 is somewhere between the two. I believe
> the Met office would call it gale force 10. Can't find a reference at the
> moment though as the largest they are reporting is gale force 9 in
> Trafalgar.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufor...e_modern_scale

Do you reckon we could lick Ivor and Ron at outboring this group? Let's
give it a whirl. :-))

I think you've hit on an American attempt to update a tried and tested
British standard weather guage with your wkipedia reference. I believe
you'll find <www.zetnet.co.uk/sigs/weather/Met_Codes/beaufort.htm> to be an
authororative account.

But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise!

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:77b3r3dqv8m9ej8p389rjdcnsch83nqovs@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:22 -0000, "cybuerke" <cybuerke@PLMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you reckon we could lick Ivor and Ron at outboring this group? Let's
>>give it a whirl. :-))
>
> You hardily see anything from me when Ivor isn't going on and on and
> on like a demented fool about spam and spammers and you can't say
> that you do why the hell can't he just ignore them like most of us
> do ? .

Are you hijacking this hijack, Ron?

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:77b3r3dqv8m9ej8p389rjdcnsch83nqovs@4ax.com
: : On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:22 -0000, "cybuerke"
: : <cybuerke@PLMgmail.com> wrote:
: :
: :
: : : Do you reckon we could lick Ivor and Ron at outboring
: : : this group? Let's give it a whirl. :-))
: :
: : You hardily see anything from me when Ivor isn't going
: : on and on and on like a demented fool about spam and
: : spammers and you can't say that you do why the hell
: : can't he just ignore them like most of us
: : do ? .

Tell you what, you ignore me and I'll ignore you. You first.

Ivor

cybuerke wrote:
> I believe
> you'll find <www.zetnet.co.uk/sigs/weather/Met_Codes/beaufort.htm> to be an
> authororative account.

I think it is about right: it correctly says that a gale is force 8 and
a storm is force 10

But what on earth has this to do with voip?

cybuerke wrote:
> "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:CKednRhSEY8BGizanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>> cybuerke wrote:
>
>>> NO!!!!! I can't just sit quietly and read this.
>>>
>>> A gale's a Force 8.. 10 is Storm Force...
>> I'd say either is correct as 10 is somewhere between the two. I believe
>> the Met office would call it gale force 10. Can't find a reference at the
>> moment though as the largest they are reporting is gale force 9 in
>> Trafalgar.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufor...e_modern_scale
>
> Do you reckon we could lick Ivor and Ron at outboring this group? Let's
> give it a whirl. :-))
Go for it!

> I think you've hit on an American attempt to update a tried and tested
> British standard weather guage with your wkipedia reference. I believe
> you'll find <www.zetnet.co.uk/sigs/weather/Met_Codes/beaufort.htm> to be an
> authororative account.
>
> But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise!

How about the Met Office site and Beaufort's original scale from 1806
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/educatio.../beaufort.html

10 is listed as a fresh gale.

I will conceed however that in many other places, force 10 is listed as
a storm. That said, whatever the force, Ivor is still pissing in the wind.

Hmmm, I wonder just what the maximum wind force is that one can piss
into without getting wet? Didn't Brainiac do an experiment on this?

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:m4q3r39079ngmqqpdq9gneqo9je4d7gub8@4ax.com
: : On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:12:47 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
: : <ivor@thisaddressis.invalid> wrote:

[snip]

: : : Tell you what, you ignore me and I'll ignore you. You
: : : first.
: :
: : Not until you cease going on and on and like a demented
: : fool about spammers I won't .

Hmm. I wasn't the one who started the thread.

Ivor

"Iain" <no-one@hairydog.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1202842029.31766.0@proxy01.news.clara.net
: : cybuerke wrote:
: : : I believe
: : : you'll find
: : : <www.zetnet.co.uk/sigs/weather/Met_Codes/beaufort.htm>
: : : to be an authororative account.
: :
: : I think it is about right: it correctly says that a
: : gale is force 8 and a storm is force 10
: :
: : But what on earth has this to do with voip?

I'm hoping Ron will get blown away.

Ivor

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jm24r35v0qv1na3kt2q8akepaq76j3i866@4ax.com

[snip]

: : You have been ranting on and on and on about spamers
: : since
: : for ever it seems give it a rest Ivor they take very
: : little notice of you if any .

You've been ranting on and on about Sipgate for years and they won't take
any notice of you either.


Ivor

mymail@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

> I know a dozen or so people round here alone who I have talked out of
> signing up with Sipgate voip is a waste of time and money for hardware
> now that BT are giving free calls evening and weekends .

More fool them. Are any of them real people, rather than you pretending
to be someone else? If so, perhaps they'd like to make themselves known?

I doubt they exist.

The fact is that Sipgate provide a low cost and fairly good service,
even though you were too stupid to be able to get it it work.Face facts,
you have gone from one provider to another and failed at each, then
blamed thenm for it.

The reasons for using VOIP are very rarely financial, but even if they
were, what BT offers is nothing like good value. But this is not the
place to discuss it, and nor is it the place you and Ivor to continue
your infantile squabbling.

<mymail@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:img8r3dm6u0t6j46j50dllg3vlcr8nn2qa@4ax.com
: : On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:44:22 +0000, Iain
: : <no-one@hairydog.co.uk> wrote:
: :
: :
: : : The fact is that Sipgate provide a low cost and
: : : fairly good service, even though you were too stupid
: : : to be able to get it it work.
: :
: : Don't be fucking stupid when all the Sipgate staff ran
: : off to some other city on a Friday afternoon for a
: : boozing weekend and the service went down early on the
: : Friday evening and didn't come back up again until late
: : the following Monday NO fucking customer had service
: : for the whole of that particular 36 hour or so period .

Proof of that allegation, please..? Have you spoken to *every* Sipgate
customer..? All 80,000+ of them..?

: : If you do not believe me ask Ivor .
: : NOW FUCK OFF YOU STUPID BASTARD .

Ah, foul language again. You know you've lost, Ron. Admit it.

Ivor

mymail@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:44:22 +0000, Iain <no-one@hairydog.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>> The fact is that Sipgate provide a low cost and fairly good service,
>> even though you were too stupid to be able to get it it work.
>
> Don't be [deleted] stupid when all the Sipgate staff ran off to some
> other city on a Friday afternoon for a boozing weekend and the service
> went down early on the Friday evening and didn't come back up again
> until late the following Monday NO [deleted] customer had service for
> the whole of that particular 36 hour or so period .

Ah yes, I remember. You claim that a fault that was not fixed for 48
hours severaly years ago proves that all the staff were off boozing.

I wonder what you'd say about BT systems that go down for far longer? In
fact, I challenge you to name a single phone service that has not been
down for at least 24 hours in one area or another in the last five years.

But I know you can't.

You are just a stupid, foul-mouthed cretin who knows nothing and doesn't
have a life, so you try to stur up trouble instead.

> If you do not believe me ask Ivor .

I wouldn't believe anything you said under any circumstances. You are a
liar, a cheat and a bloody nuisance. That's why you keep getting chucked
off boards, why you have your ISP accounts suspended and why everyone
dislikes you.

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:38:23 +0000, Iain <no-one@hairydog.co.uk>
wrote:

>You are just a stupid, foul-mouthed cretin who knows nothing and doesn't
>have a life, so you try to stur up trouble instead.
>
>I wouldn't believe anything you said under any circumstances. You are a
>liar, a cheat and a bloody nuisance. That's why you keep getting chucked
>off boards, why you have your ISP accounts suspended and why everyone
>dislikes you.

Elegantly put.