Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > News > Newsgroups > uk.telecom.voip
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2006, 09:51 AM
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Pet_=40_www=2Egymratz=2Eco=2Euk_=3B=AC=29=22?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

Martin² wrote:

>> With regards to QOS I presume it is best to give a really high percentage
>> to VOIP (Level1 ?) because you will still only use what you need thereby
>> leaving un-used bandwidth for less important file transfers and stuff?

>
> As far as I can tell it's done differently on every make VoIP router.
> The recommended setting for my Draytek is 60% (IIRC) and it works fine,
> though with MaxDSL higher speeds
> it probably doesn't need to be that high.


Thanks Martin.
Only thing I have found that lets my Draytek down compared to my old
Netgear router in the shop is any form of field specific help.

If you don't actually know what an abbreviated field is you need to
trawl the interweb to make sense of it whereas on the netgear, there is
an extremely useful help screen that runs down the right hand side of
the browser when doing admin stuff. Makes getting the right settings
much easier first time round.
But that really is my only gripe though.
Just had a 2nd 2910VG delivered this morning to replace said netgear
device.

Cheers
Pete

--
http://gymratz.co.uk - Best Gym Equipment & Bodybuilding Supplements UK.
http://gymratz.co.uk/polar-heart-rate-monitors/Polar Heart Rate Monitors
http://fitness-equipment-uk.com - UK's No.1 Fitness Equipment Suppliers.
http://water-rower.co.uk - Worlds best prices on the Worlds best Rower.

Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2006, 10:22 PM
ßødincµs²°°°
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

Recently, Paul Cupis popped out over the fence
around uk.telecom.voip and said...
|ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
|> Recently, Paul Cupis popped out over the fence
|> around uk.telecom.voip and said...
|> |So, do you understand what the 'o' in VoIP stands for? I guess not.
|> |
|> |Voice chat services of IM clients is clearly VoIP.
|> |
| >
|> Do you deserve an answer? Hmmm... Let me think...
|> It probably will end way down in your deep well of ignorance and get
|> lost.
|> So, NO, you don't deserve an answer.
|> But - wait! You had an answer... Oh, whatever...
|> Voice over Internet Protocol is WAY different that "Voice chat services
|> through internet". Internet is NOT all IP, is also ATM, BB, and a
|> plethora of other protocols to let the data flow.
|> You can talk using two PCs through a direct modem connection on a leased
|> or dial-up line - using Voice enabled modems, but that AIN'T VoIP.
|> So stop muddling the water.
|
|I'm not the one "muddling" the water. We were not talking about ATM,
|"BB" etc. We are not talking about direct modem connections between two
|machines (tried running Yahoo IM over that, have you?).
|
|We were talking about Skype and them IM protocols/software such as Yahoo.
|
|I would contend that these software programs run primarily over IP. This
|is based on the fact that you (for example) register with a Yahoo server
|over IP.
|
|So, yes, they are VoIP.
|
Irrecoverable. Sorry, I ain't time to loose, go back to school.
--
ßødincµs²°°° - The Y2K Druid
----------------------------
Law 42 on computing: Anything that could go wron@~ ¬
$: Access Violation -- Core dumped

Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2006, 11:13 PM
ßødincµs²°°°
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

Recently, RH popped out over the fence
around uk.telecom.voip and said...
|> |Not all universities are against skype being run by students
|> Name one that's NOT against it.
|I googled it it and found a few, true not as many as those which have banned
|it, but some are happy amyway
Read the horror story in this NG from Phil Thompson... Any network admin
that doesn't ban Skype is at risk of this.
You can't ask the Skype category users - by definition not able to do so
- to dig deep in their Skype configuration and disable the "Supernode"
option (that's enabled by default). They don't know, they don't
understand and they don't care.
Just one careless user can make all the network he's on totally useless.
TWOTHOUSANDFIVEHUNDRED connections to a PC!!! This is DDOS, and is going
to be a CRIME in UK, when the new Computer Crime bill goes through.

|IMHO yahoo and MSN are cross connecting because of SKYPE's business model.
|They relise
|that skype is so far ahead, that they will be left behind if the only
|competitors are lots of smaller units.
??? Sorry, what did you say? Well, I don't know on the planet you live,
but here on Earth, just MSN userbase is WAY larger than the Skype
userbase.

|Not best for customers maybe, but if SKYPE was integrated with others then
|people using msn or yahoo would have no need to install and run SKYPE
One word: Monopoly. I.t. d.o.e.s.n.'.t. w.o.r.k.!.

|I am sorry but Skype is way cheaper than other VOIP systems, a couple ofquid
|for a headset is all that most people use, true thecomputer has to be on,
|but you keep missing the point that skype users are happy with this, skype
|users on the whole are not looking for a phone replacement system just a
|cheap and easy to use system when they are on the computer.
Well, Skype users are happy with this... so be it. But they don't have
to complain if their PC or their connection is bogged up, or if their
provider disconnects them because they're killing the network segment.

|Got to agree skype out costs are not the cheapest, but from a business point
|of view if skype makes a decent profit, it is earnered. You also have to
|remember that as skype is the biggest VOIP service around that a lot of
|people they will call will be on skype already, in my case I have lots of
|friends and family on skype (through no prompting from me) but know only 6
|or so on VOIP and only 2 of which on the same network or can be called via
|free cross network calls
1) Again Skype IT'S NOT VoIP. Voice over IP HAS to be (by international
standards definition organizations like ISO) SIP or H323. Actually IAX
(born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a further protocol.
2) Number is not strength, especially when the application is ill-
engineered like Skype.
3) I'm not at war against Skype, I'm advising you that it's a floating
mine.

|> How could you be so wrong, it's impossible to say. I can do THE SAME
|> with a free SIP phone software on my laptop wherever you can do your
|> things with Skype.
|> The SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) takes care of everything, you
|> don't have to configure a firewall to go through, except where the
|> administrator EXPRESSLY is blocking outgoing traffic of any nature.
|> Any stateful inspection firewall will let your traffic go through
|> because it's originated FROM a device on the internal side of the
|> network.
|> You see, I can do the same as you (actually more than you); I'm a better
|> user because I was forced to know more; I'm spending less money; I'm
|> using open standards; I'm more environmentally friendly because my
|> equipment uses less energy; my equipment is cheaper and more reliable; I
|> have a redundant service (if a provider is down, there are at least
|> other three I can use); my three year old daughter is calling her
|> grandpa in Italy with a push of a button on a basic phone (and doesn't
|> hurt my pocket).
|> See my point?
|I see your point, shame you don't see mine. like lots of techy people you
|seem blinkered
|to the real world and real life applications. I might say I had the views
|as you in the past but real life appilcation has changed me.
Oh, blimey! If you buy a Netgear VoIP router from Sipgate it comes
preconfigured, and it's plug & play, no configuration of anything
whatsoever. Plug the ADSL modem network cable <here>, the PC network
cable <here>, the power adaptor in the wall socket and in the router
<here>, a plain bog standard phone <here>, and it's done. A plumber can
do it.
Less complicated than a download, an installation and a configuration of
a software with your credentials, and fiddling with headphones & mic and
their levels, echo cancellation, full duplex audio card, new drivers for
the same... You are the geek, not me!

|SIP VOIP is great, it can do things so much more than SKYPE, but SKYPE in
|*SOME* is better,
|Like you I try not to use SKYPE, believe it or not, I have a nice asterisk
|systems, multiple lines in and ATA and VOIP Phones, could not live with out
|them.
|But Skype has 2 main advantages
|1- It is p*ss easy to install, computer phobic people can install it, with a
|SIP hardware it is difficult, how do I know? I have had to help lots of
|people install their units, true once they have it they love it. Problem is
|people are impatient, if they can not get something running quickly they
|lose interest, skype works pretty much out of the box
See before... You're wrong.

|2- User Base. Like I said I have family abroad, and they all pretty much
|(through their only circle of friends) got into skype, with no prompting
|from me, true I could give them all a small ATA so I could call them, but
|they would still need skype to speak to their own network of people
Your experience is irrelevant, Skype DOESN'T have a large user base, get
the facts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant...ging#User_base
100 million of downloads, a peak of 7 million users online. Should be
AOL (AIM) Microsoft and Yahoo scared of Skype? Hmmm... I don't think so.

|Lack of standalone hardware snd open protocol means it is not as versatile
|as SIP, but it does mean that teh core product can change and improve, to
|try and fix security holes that might pop up
It's the proprietary protocol and enclosed userbase approach that will
kill Skype. It's been bought by eBay, to complement the services they
have for the barters, so they can chat away the time waiting for the
auction to end... :-)

|> It's not useless, it's just all the hype around it that makes me sick,
|> like all the fuss with iPods and PS3 and whatever.
|> Hype, hype and nothing else, based on a sidereal space void.
|I say the Hype around it is justified, unlike PS3 and other product where
|the product is hyped by marketing companies, most of SKYPEs Hype has been
|user led and word of mouth, like google in the beginning
Don't buy shares, I'm forecasting a bleak future for it. The business
model is totally flawed.

--
ßødincµs²°°° - The Y2K Druid
----------------------------
Law 42 on computing: Anything that could go wron@~ ¬
$: Access Violation -- Core dumped

Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2006, 11:26 PM
Paul Cupis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
> Voice over IP HAS to be (by international standards definition
> organizations like ISO) SIP or H323.


Why?

> Actually IAX
> (born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a further protocol.


So, you are saying that today IAX is not VoIP, but tomorrow it might be?

Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2006, 12:46 AM
Ivor Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...



"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ek82k8$tdm$1@news.freedom2surf.net
> ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
> > Voice over IP HAS to be (by international standards
> > definition organizations like ISO) SIP or H323.

>
> Why?
>
> > Actually IAX
> > (born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a
> > further protocol.

>
> So, you are saying that today IAX is not VoIP, but
> tomorrow it might be?


Hmm, so the IAX ATA I just used isn't VoIP..?

If you're using IP (which your connection to the Internet does,
presumably, that's why it's called Internet Protocol) then any Voice
traffic over it is by default Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP for
short.

Where is it laid down that a specific protocol has to be used..?

Ivor




Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2006, 12:34 PM
RH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

> ??? Sorry, what did you say? Well, I don't know on the planet you live,
> but here on Earth, just MSN userbase is WAY larger than the Skype
> userbase.


Yes as a messanger service it is much bigger, but as a VOIP system (you can
jump around screaming as much as you want the term VOIP is open to
interpretation) skype is much more used, at least in europe

> |Not best for customers maybe, but if SKYPE was integrated with others
> then
> |people using msn or yahoo would have no need to install and run SKYPE
> One word: Monopoly. I.t. d.o.e.s.n.'.t. w.o.r.k.!.


Yep it would be nice if it was integrated, but SKYPE is a business and if it
feels it needs to keep it all in house
for lets say advertising on the client software that is up to them, If the
customers don't like it they will walk.
Monoply does work : Look at Microsoft, they have become one only because
their users have made them one.

> Well, Skype users are happy with this... so be it. But they don't have
> to complain if their PC or their connection is bogged up, or if their
> provider disconnects them because they're killing the network segment.


If the cutomers are happy, only people I ever hear complain about SKYPE are
the
use smug SIP brigade

> 1) Again Skype IT'S NOT VoIP. Voice over IP HAS to be (by international
> standards definition organizations like ISO) SIP or H323. Actually IAX
> (born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a further protocol.
> 2) Number is not strength, especially when the application is ill-
> engineered like Skype.
> 3) I'm not at war against Skype, I'm advising you that it's a floating
> mine.


Again your term of VOIP id your interpretation, yes there are ratified
standards for VOIP.
Just because SKYPE does not use them, does not mean it is not VOIP

There are international ratfied ISO standards for paper envelopes as well,
do that mean if someone
makes a non standard envelope it is not actually an envelope?

There is NO official term for VOIP, googling around the general feeling is
it refers to Voice over Internet Protocol, ie a IP based LAN or wide
Internet. Cisco I understand also has its own standards which are closed, I
would also term these as VOIP

> Oh, blimey! If you buy a Netgear VoIP router from Sipgate it comes
> preconfigured, and it's plug & play, no configuration of anything
> whatsoever. Plug the ADSL modem network cable <here>, the PC network
> cable <here>, the power adaptor in the wall socket and in the router
> <here>, a plain bog standard phone <here>, and it's done. A plumber can
> do it.
> Less complicated than a download, an installation and a configuration of
> a software with your credentials, and fiddling with headphones & mic and
> their levels, echo cancellation, full duplex audio card, new drivers for
> the same... You are the geek, not me!


Yes thankfully people like SIPGATE do offer plug and play kit nowerdays, but
there are still lots of providers
who either charge a premium or only offer softphones (like Skype)




Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2006, 12:36 AM
ßødincµs²°°°
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

Recently, Ivor Jones popped out over the fence
around uk.telecom.voip and said...
|"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
|news:ek82k8$tdm$1@news.freedom2surf.net
|> ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
|> > Voice over IP HAS to be (by international standards
|> > definition organizations like ISO) SIP or H323.
|> Why?
Because VoIP is an ISO standard! You can't define your application a
VoIP application if it's NOT conform to the defined VoIP standard.
This said, standards can be extended, expanded, modified, upgraded,
etc...
|>
|> > Actually IAX
|> > (born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a
|> > further protocol.
|> So, you are saying that today IAX is not VoIP, but
|> tomorrow it might be?
|Hmm, so the IAX ATA I just used isn't VoIP..?
|If you're using IP (which your connection to the Internet does,
|presumably, that's why it's called Internet Protocol) then any Voice
|traffic over it is by default Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP for
|short.
|
|Where is it laid down that a specific protocol has to be used..?
ISO definition of VoIP. Google it...

|Ivor
|
Quoque, tu Bruto, filii mii...

Can you please take a break, look into the TCP protocol ISO/OSI stack,
figure out on which layer of the stack the IP protocol is, and - once
and for all - decide whether a proprietary application communication
protocol is on the same ISO/OSI level of the IP protocol or not?
VoIP is an acronym for Voice over IP, not "voice communication through
internet".
I don't want to repeat this anymore, it's now up to you to get the
things right.

Cheers

--
ßødincµs²°°° - The Y2K Druid
----------------------------
Law 42 on computing: Anything that could go wron@~ ¬
$: Access Violation -- Core dumped

Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2006, 02:29 AM
Ivor Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

"ßødincµs²°°°" <this.em@il.is.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fd845f9a11f06459896f8@text.news.blueyond er.co.uk
> Recently, Ivor Jones popped out over the fence
> around uk.telecom.voip and said...


[snip]

> > Where is it laid down that a specific protocol has to
> > be used..?

> ISO definition of VoIP. Google it...
>
> Quoque, tu Bruto, filii mii...
>
> Can you please take a break, look into the TCP protocol
> ISO/OSI stack, figure out on which layer of the stack the
> IP protocol is, and - once and for all - decide whether a
> proprietary application communication protocol is on the
> same ISO/OSI level of the IP protocol or not?
> VoIP is an acronym for Voice over IP, not "voice
> communication through internet".


So the IP packets carrying my voice over the IAX connection to my mate's
Asterisk box isn't VoIP..?

I think someone's definitions need updating. It's voice, it's using IP,
therefore it's Voice over IP.

It walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, what would
you call it..? Or would you ask the ISO about that as well..?

> I don't want to repeat this anymore, it's now up to you
> to get the things right.


No, it's up to anyone with common sense to see that voice carried over IP
packets is by definition Voice over IP.

Ivor



Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2006, 08:36 PM
Soruk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:29:31 -0000, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>"ßødincµs²°°°" <this.em@il.is.invalid> wrote in message
>news:MPG.1fd845f9a11f06459896f8@text.news.blueyon der.co.uk
>> Recently, Ivor Jones popped out over the fence
>> around uk.telecom.voip and said...

>
>[snip]
>
>> > Where is it laid down that a specific protocol has to
>> > be used..?

>> ISO definition of VoIP. Google it...
>>
>> Quoque, tu Bruto, filii mii...
>>
>> Can you please take a break, look into the TCP protocol
>> ISO/OSI stack, figure out on which layer of the stack the
>> IP protocol is, and - once and for all - decide whether a
>> proprietary application communication protocol is on the
>> same ISO/OSI level of the IP protocol or not?
>> VoIP is an acronym for Voice over IP, not "voice
>> communication through internet".

>
>So the IP packets carrying my voice over the IAX connection to my mate's
>Asterisk box isn't VoIP..?
>
>I think someone's definitions need updating. It's voice, it's using IP,
>therefore it's Voice over IP.
>
>It walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, what would
>you call it..? Or would you ask the ISO about that as well..?
>
>> I don't want to repeat this anymore, it's now up to you
>> to get the things right.

>
>No, it's up to anyone with common sense to see that voice carried over IP
>packets is by definition Voice over IP.


Even Skype is VoIP - even though it does its own thing and is totally
incompatible with any other system out there.

--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell Eridani Star System
MailStripper - http://www.MailStripper.eu/ - SMTP spam filter
Mail Me Anywhere - http://www.MailMeAnywhere.com/ - Mobile email
Second Number - http://secondnumber.matrixnetwork.co.uk/

Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 12:59 AM
Ivor Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

"Soruk" <soruk@bitbucket.eridani.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnemujmi.gi5.soruk@zeskia.int.eridani.co.uk

[snip]

> Even Skype is VoIP - even though it does its own thing
> and is totally incompatible with any other system out
> there.


Much as I cringe to admit it, you're right.

Ivor



Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2006, 07:49 PM
Loz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pledge to the moderator...

ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
> Recently, Ivor Jones popped out over the fence
> around uk.telecom.voip and said...
> |"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> |news:ek82k8$tdm$1@news.freedom2surf.net
> |> ßødincµs²°°° wrote:
> |> > Voice over IP HAS to be (by international standards
> |> > definition organizations like ISO) SIP or H323.
> |> Why?
> Because VoIP is an ISO standard! You can't define your application a
> VoIP application if it's NOT conform to the defined VoIP standard.
> This said, standards can be extended, expanded, modified, upgraded,
> etc...
> |>
> |> > Actually IAX
> |> > (born with Asterix) will probably be accepted as a
> |> > further protocol.
> |> So, you are saying that today IAX is not VoIP, but
> |> tomorrow it might be?
> |Hmm, so the IAX ATA I just used isn't VoIP..?
> |If you're using IP (which your connection to the Internet does,
> |presumably, that's why it's called Internet Protocol) then any Voice
> |traffic over it is by default Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP for
> |short.
> |
> |Where is it laid down that a specific protocol has to be used..?
> ISO definition of VoIP. Google it...
>
> |Ivor
> |
> Quoque, tu Bruto, filii mii...
>
> Can you please take a break, look into the TCP protocol ISO/OSI stack,
> figure out on which layer of the stack the IP protocol is, and - once
> and for all - decide whether a proprietary application communication
> protocol is on the same ISO/OSI level of the IP protocol or not?
> VoIP is an acronym for Voice over IP, not "voice communication through
> internet".
> I don't want to repeat this anymore, it's now up to you to get the
> things right.
>
> Cheers
>



IP protocol - layer 3
Application - layer 7
But since the Application layer sits above the network layer (level 3)
it is still VOIP.

Just like this usenet is over IP.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45