Re: Linksys pap2

#1 (**permalink**) 10-09-2005, 10:11 PM

"m0rk" <no@email.ever> wrote in message
news:MPG.1db3a1137951faf59896fb@news.gradwell.com
> Im about to put my Linksys Pap2 on ebay ... thought would
> offer to anyone on here before I do that.

Thanks for the thought, but this is a non-advert group

http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.telecom.voip.html

Ivor

#2 (**permalink**) 10-09-2005, 10:33 PM

<Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7b6jk1hct3k951133b7357ghr5tqtklr6r@4ax.com

[snip]

> Oh come on Ivor be reasonable there is a difference
> between advertising something and offering something good
> and cheap to people you sort of know or associated with
> in some way .

I'm not entering into another slanging match on this subject. The charter
is clear.

I would however fully support any proposals for the creation of
uk.adverts.telecom.voip should you or anyone wish to pursue it.

Ivor

#3 (**permalink**) 10-09-2005, 10:50 PM

FOAD

"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:3qtk69Fgmgb6U1@individual.net...
>
>
> <Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:7b6jk1hct3k951133b7357ghr5tqtklr6r@4ax.com
>
> [snip]
>
>> Oh come on Ivor be reasonable there is a difference
>> between advertising something and offering something good
>> and cheap to people you sort of know or associated with
>> in some way .
>
> I'm not entering into another slanging match on this subject. The charter
> is clear.
>
> I would however fully support any proposals for the creation of
> uk.adverts.telecom.voip should you or anyone wish to pursue it.
>
> Ivor
>
>

#4 (**permalink**) 10-09-2005, 11:02 PM

<Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:s97jk1h0sev2aqk157i6iufup47lqktkcb@4ax.com
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:33:43 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> > I'm not entering into another slanging match on this
> > subject. The charter is clear.
> Ivor how many times has it been said that you do not own
> this group yet you still insist on acting like you do .
> Has anyone else complained about this so called
> advertrisment I haven't seen anyone except you .
> Charters are a load of rubbish I bet you do something
> every day near enough that is in voiolation of the
> charter with God almighty gave to Moses for us all to
> abide by has most of us do .

Propose the creation of an adverts group and I will support it 100%.

Be prepared to see it through though, it is not a process for the faint
hearted..!

Ivor

#5 (**permalink**) 10-10-2005, 03:54 AM

In uk.telecom.voip Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

> <Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:s97jk1h0sev2aqk157i6iufup47lqktkcb@4ax.com
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:33:43 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> > <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I'm not entering into another slanging match on this
> > > subject. The charter is clear.
> > Ivor how many times has it been said that you do not own
> > this group yet you still insist on acting like you do .
> > Has anyone else complained about this so called
> > advertrisment I haven't seen anyone except you .
> > Charters are a load of rubbish I bet you do something
> > every day near enough that is in voiolation of the
> > charter with God almighty gave to Moses for us all to
> > abide by has most of us do .

> Propose the creation of an adverts group and I will support it 100%.

> Be prepared to see it through though, it is not a process for the faint
> hearted..!

Personally, I'd rather see the odd advert or two, especially
coming from a private party, than 99.9999% of the shite that shows up in
this group daily. Just something to think about.

#6 (**permalink**) 10-10-2005, 03:57 AM

On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:50:50 +0100, Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:

>Charters are a load of rubbish I bet you do something every day near
>enough that is in voiolation of the charter with God almighty gave to
>Moses for us all to abide by has most of us do .

If we didn't have a charter we wouldn't have a group. Since we have a
charter and group it would seem wise to stick to the principles with
which the group was created (unless explicitly changed), i.e. no
advertising even if this isn't (and shouldn't be) enshrined in any
law.

While in the real world politicians and religious leaders make all
kinds of crazy rules and laws and we each have to decide which are of
value for ourselves, most of us have an underlying moral code which
governs our actions. While i'm sure the original poster meant no harm,
Ivor is right (in both the literal and moral sense) to point out the
minor error.

Rgds
Jonathan

#7 (**permalink**) 10-10-2005, 04:42 AM

JC wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:50:50 +0100, Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
>
>>Charters are a load of rubbish I bet you do something every day near
>>enough that is in voiolation of the charter with God almighty gave to
>>Moses for us all to abide by has most of us do .
>
> If we didn't have a charter we wouldn't have a group. Since we have a
> charter and group it would seem wise to stick to the principles with
> which the group was created (unless explicitly changed), i.e. no
> advertising even if this isn't (and shouldn't be) enshrined in any
> law.
>
> While in the real world politicians and religious leaders make all
> kinds of crazy rules and laws and we each have to decide which are of
> value for ourselves, most of us have an underlying moral code which
> governs our actions. While i'm sure the original poster meant no harm,
> Ivor is right (in both the literal and moral sense) to point out the
> minor error.
>
> Rgds
> Jonathan

How about not x-posting this argument to uk.adverts.computer?

Ta.

qm

#8 (**permalink**) 10-10-2005, 08:58 AM

On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:50:34 GMT, "Top Poster" <twadger@twadger.com>
wrote:

>NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.109.123.189
>X-Trace: newsfe1-win.ntli.net 1128898234 81.109.123.189 (Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:50:34 BST)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:50:34 BST
>Organization: NTL

why am I not surprised.

Phil
--

Usenet spam eaten by a Hamster http://www.tglsoft.de/
No more cable clowns :-))
Please do not feed or re-quote the trolls.

#9 (**permalink**) 10-10-2005, 12:18 PM

In article <6f4kk19lchs35vlrl0sqhuju06s9eepbae@4ax.com>, Tone
<tone@spamcop.net> writes

>Turtill hasnt the balls to see anything through

"Dexter" isn't Turtill. HTH.

#10 (**permalink**) 10-14-2005, 12:28 AM

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:44:38 +0100, turtill@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:45:14 +0100, Dexter@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:28:49 +0100, Tone <tone@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:18:47 +0100, Mike Tomlinson
>>><mike@NOSPAM.jasper.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <6f4kk19lchs35vlrl0sqhuju06s9eepbae@4ax.com>, Tone
>>>><tone@spamcop.net> writes
>>>>
>>>>>Turtill hasnt the balls to see anything through
>>>>
>>>>"Dexter" isn't Turtill. HTH.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>He might fool you but he dont fool me
>>Why don't you AND Turtill fuck off out of here you both made
>>yourselves damn neusences in the disabilty group now you have both
>>started here and are proceeding to totally disrupt this group also .
>
>I post here Ron and I have not made any nuisance posts. I suggest you
>aim your comments away from me.

Who is Ron? Not the dreaded Ron Chew of Demon infamy surely? The man
of many ISP's and names too who lives with a bloke?
me