Re: Sipgate

mymail@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Tax included (19%) : £3.82
>> Total w/o tax: £20.0
> Just what does this unscrupulous useless company think they are doing
> charging 19% VAT for their goods !

Perhaps they feel that it is appropriate to comply with the law? Why do
you think that is a bad idea?

> not content with providing a
> totally useless service

Rubbish. It is a perfectly useable service.

> it looks like now they have started to rip
> customers of big time in other ways also .

It looks like you have gone off your trolley again.

If you dislike them so much, how come you are using them? Why not switch
to Vonage, and find out what being ripped off is really like?


--

Iain

"Iain" <no-one@hairydog.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184352012.2411.0@proxy02.news.clara.net...
> mymail@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Tax included (19%) : £3.82 Total w/o tax: £20.0
>> Just what does this unscrupulous useless company think they are doing
>> charging 19% VAT for their goods !
>
> Perhaps they feel that it is appropriate to comply with the law? Why do
> you think that is a bad idea?
>
>> not content with providing a
>> totally useless service
>
> Rubbish. It is a perfectly useable service.
>
>> it looks like now they have started to rip
>> customers of big time in other ways also .
>
> It looks like you have gone off your trolley again.

Was he ever on it..?
>
> If you dislike them so much, how come you are using them? Why not switch
> to Vonage, and find out what being ripped off is really like?

Ah, but he *isn't* using them..! He gave them up about 2 years ago after
the system went off for a couple of days due to a major failure (it *was*
in their early days of UK operation) and hasn't stopped railing about them
since.

Don't get him started on Vonage..!

Ivor

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:18:21 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

>Ah, but he *isn't* using them..! He gave them up about 2 years ago after
>the system went off for a couple of days due to a major failure (it *was*
>in their early days of UK operation) and hasn't stopped railing about them
>since.
>
>Don't get him started on Vonage..!

Beats me why you guys respond to his pathetic trollings. He is a prize
fuckwit after all.

OMG, now I've done it.

Ed.

"Ed Straker" <ed@shado.moon.org> wrote in message
news:408i931sii2md44u3anegkono87kkfrs2h@news.indiv idual.de...
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:18:21 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Ah, but he *isn't* using them..! He gave them up about 2 years ago after
>>the system went off for a couple of days due to a major failure (it
>>*was*
>>in their early days of UK operation) and hasn't stopped railing about
>>them
>>since.
>>
>>Don't get him started on Vonage..!
>
> Beats me why you guys respond to his pathetic trollings. He is a prize
> fuckwit after all.
>
> OMG, now I've done it.
>
> Ed.

It's fun sometimes..! Although I admit I do prod him too much, I'll try
and shut up for a bit.

Ivor

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:id8i93hcbod8h9o69u8n1e6lo180bg5g81@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:13:34 +0200, Ed Straker <ed@shado.moon.org>
> wrote:
> Like I have stated many times it takes one to know one now FOAD .

If you didn't keep changing your posting address, we wouldn't be reading
your drivel, or replying to it, as most of us have you in our blocked
senders list with several of your previous aliases.
Doesn't it send any sort of message to you as to why you have to
continuously change your posting address, just to get your posts read?

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:n9ci93l2pmmpiq4opkh5pu6b1rn8u4r5g5@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:51:22 GMT, "Harry Stottle"
> <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote:
>
>>
>><mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:id8i93hcbod8h9o69u8n1e6lo180bg5g81@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:13:34 +0200, Ed Straker <ed@shado.moon.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> Like I have stated many times it takes one to know one now FOAD .
>>
>>If you didn't keep changing your posting address, we wouldn't be reading
>>your drivel, or replying to it, as most of us have you in our blocked
>>senders list with several of your previous aliases.
>>Doesn't it send any sort of message to you as to why you have to
>>continuously change your posting address, just to get your posts read?
>>
> Oh do shut up

If only you would...

Ivor

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:19:49 GMT, mymail@hotmail.com wrote:

>Like I have stated many times it takes one to know one now FOAD .

Not a chance buddy.

You see, unlike you, I see this newsgroup as a means of exchanging
*useful* information relating to VOIP and not as a platform for
presenting pathetic bigoted inaccurate information, in which your
biased childish ramblings seem to specialise.

I have learned much from this newsgroup but can honestly say that I
have never learned one useful piece of information from any of you
posts.

Have a nice life.

Ed