"paul123" <paul@redy.net> wrote in message
news:1156352159.034722.33150@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com
> victor.ward@mail.com wrote:
> >
> > Paul - Can I ask why you suggest a 2 port ATA? If it's
> > because there are two of us (i.e. needing 2
> > lines/devices) we would be sharing a single line. Is
> > there another reason I'd need 2 ports that I'm not
> > aware of?
> Yes, In case you both want to make a call at the same
> time. You would, of course, need 2 handsets (or DECT
> sets). If not, a one port ATA would be more "economical".
To put it more directly, 2 ports will effectively give you two independent
lines. A single port device such as the SPA-1001 while it is the same in
that it can accommodate two accounts, each with its own number, only has
one phone socket, so only one line can be in use at once. If you want to
use a DECT cordless phone, a single one is obviously easier than carrying
two about, but if you use wired phones then two independent ones are more
versatile.
Note that if you have a slow uplink (some cable systems only have 128k on
the uplink) then two independent calls will probably not work too well.
256k or higher will not have any problems in this respect IME.
Ivor