I've just got a USB phone.
And it's rubbish!
OK... I can hear the other person and the other person can hear me.
But the sound uality is amazingly poor.
The make of the phone is Waitec... but I've seeen several phones
exactly the same looking under different badges.
Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
On 30 Oct 2005 21:04:39 -0800, "OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote:
>Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
its not a phone, now is it. Its a USB sound card device. So the
quality of sound may be as much to do with the software and service
you are using as with the audio interface you have added. What are
they ?
Phil
--
Usenet spam eaten by a Hamster http://www.tglsoft.de/
No more cable clowns :-))
Please do not feed or re-quote the trolls.
> its not a phone, now is it. Its a USB sound card device. So the
> quality of sound may be as much to do with the software and service
> you are using as with the audio interface you have added. What are
> they ?
hmmm... well i'm using skype.
the phone: you just plug it in and away you go! no other software or
drivers needed.
(there is another bit of software that you can have that connects the
phone to skype.)
the machine i have is a dell p4 with standard sound card.
"OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130768625.183353.73560@g44g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> > its not a phone, now is it. Its a USB sound card device. So the
> > quality of sound may be as much to do with the software and service
> > you are using as with the audio interface you have added. What are
> > they ?
> hmmm... well i'm using skype.
> the phone: you just plug it in and away you go! no other software or
> drivers needed.
> (there is another bit of software that you can have that connects the
> phone to skype.)
>
> the machine i have is a dell p4 with standard sound card.
>
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
> I've just got a USB phone.
> And it's rubbish!
> OK... I can hear the other person and the other person can hear me.
> But the sound uality is amazingly poor.
> The make of the phone is Waitec... but I've seeen several phones
> exactly the same looking under different badges.
>
> Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
I've got a Yamamoto badged one connected to the kids' machine and it's
working fine. The only software that came with it was for Skype but http://www.yealink.com/english/support.htm has software for X-lite,
Voipbuster and Net2Phone. I've seen the same phone badged as Yamamoto, US
Robotics, Waitec and Yealink.
No they are not all like this, you have to be very careful....
I can recommend two USB devices, the first is a hardwired CyberphoneK
(www.voipvoice.com) and the second a DECT cordless USB phone primarily aimed
at Skype called the Dualphone (www.dualphone.net). I also use a USB
plantronics headset (USB45 I think).
Using either of these devices on a Skype to Skype call the audio quality is
awesome, I have heard nothing in 25 years of telecoms that comes close....
yet! The Dualphone in particular is so good and does 16kbit sampling.
I have bog standard onboard USB2 ports on both Asrock and gigabyte
motherboards.
Regards,
Paul
"OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130735079.614516.221720@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> I've just got a USB phone.
> And it's rubbish!
> OK... I can hear the other person and the other person can hear me.
> But the sound uality is amazingly poor.
> The make of the phone is Waitec... but I've seeen several phones
> exactly the same looking under different badges.
>
> Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> OM
>
Do you know what bandwidth skype uses, what CODECS?
Regards,
Paul
"Phil Thompson" <phil.thompson@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:lpgcm1tl7eo7tql6gqe97rc95kp2etn68p@4ax.com...
> On 31 Oct 2005 06:23:45 -0800, "OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>hmmm... well i'm using skype.
>>the phone: you just plug it in and away you go! no other software or
>>drivers needed.
>
> other than skype, presumably.
>
> The crappy audio is probably down to the weak bandwidth used by skype.
>
> Phil
> --
>
> Usenet spam eaten by a Hamster http://www.tglsoft.de/
> No more cable clowns :-))
> Please do not feed or re-quote the trolls.
If the Waitec is the Yamamoto then I have played with one of these devices.
Compared to another hardwired USB phone like the CyberphoneK using Skype
then if I rated the Cyberphone 10/10 I would give the Yamamoto 5/10.
I did exchange a number of emails with Yamamoto on this subject some three
months ago and gave the phone away eventually as the audio was disappointing
when compared to what I had become used to.
Regards,
Paul
"themgt" <themgt@morningstar.eu.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.10.31.18.45.46.304918@morningstar.eu .org...
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:04:39 -0800, OM wrote:
>
>> I've just got a USB phone.
>> And it's rubbish!
>> OK... I can hear the other person and the other person can hear me.
>> But the sound uality is amazingly poor.
>> The make of the phone is Waitec... but I've seeen several phones
>> exactly the same looking under different badges.
>>
>> Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
>
> I've got a Yamamoto badged one connected to the kids' machine and it's
> working fine. The only software that came with it was for Skype but
> http://www.yealink.com/english/support.htm has software for X-lite,
> Voipbuster and Net2Phone. I've seen the same phone badged as Yamamoto, US
> Robotics, Waitec and Yealink.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:28:14 GMT, "Paul Westwell" <paul@nospam.me.uk>
wrote:
>What crappy bandwidth are you referring to ?
>Do you know what bandwidth skype uses
when I attempted to use it the bandwidth it used was about 6-8 kbits/s
it was like using a phone with one of the wires intermittently
disconnecting.
At least if something that uses 100 kbits/s hits a rough patch on the
internet there are plenty of packets getting through to make the call
workable. Start off with a weak little data stream and you don't have
to lose much for it to be rubbish, and rubbish it was.
> what CODECS?
whatever proprietary thing it uses, it offers no obvious options.
Phil
--
Usenet spam eaten by a Hamster http://www.tglsoft.de/
No more cable clowns :-))
Please do not feed or re-quote the trolls.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Paul Westwell blurted out atop a fullquote:
> Do you know what bandwidth skype uses, what CODECS?
I know nothing more than what I've learned on this group very
recently, specifically a cited PDF report. Maybe you could try it
yourself - usenet groups aren't supposed to be write-only. (A bit
more reading might help you to understand how to follow-up properly
on usenet, too.)
"Paul Westwell" <paul@nospam.me.uk> wrote in message
news:ifu9f.27724$65.26498@newsfe6-win.ntli.net
> What crappy bandwidth are you referring to ?
>
> Do you know what bandwidth skype uses, what CODECS?
Bandwidth, I don't know, I haven't checked recently. Codec, proprietary.
Nobody except Skype know the full details.
Ivor
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
On 2005-10-31, Paul Westwell <paul@nospam.me.uk> wrote:
>
> The Skype sound engine is powered by Global IP Sound and is not proprietary.
> The following link decribes the GIPS engine
> http://www.globalipsound.com/datasheets/VoiceEngine.pdf
That document is not particularily enlightening on whether the codecs
employed by the GIPS VoiceEngine are proprietary or not. For the iLBC
codec at least, the link to ilbcfreeware from here is informative:
As the source code for the iLBC codec is published and its license
grants, among other things, royalty-free use, this codec could be argued
to be non-proprietary. The status of the iSAC codec, which Skype is
rumoured to use, is much clearer. No source code is available and the
way it integrates with other components of VoiceEngine is not explained
in any detail. I cannot see how the Global IP Sound product is not
proprietary.
"OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130885600.373260.225760@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
>>
>> Phil explained that you have a USB sound card.
> a bit harsh for u to say that. : p
>
> usb sound card?
> what's that?
>
Creative model # SB0300 Sound Blaster® Audigy® 2 NX
It's not exactly a "card" but a USB device that produces sound.. eg. USB
phone.
No soundcard needed in the PC as the USB device is a sound"card"...
"Ken Ward" <ken.g1itv@MTLworld.com> wrote in message
news:qsT9f.12793$iZ4.3386@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
|
| "OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:1130885600.373260.225760@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
| >> You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
| >>
| >> Phil explained that you have a USB sound card.
| > a bit harsh for u to say that. : p
| >
| > usb sound card?
| > what's that?
| >
| Creative model # SB0300 Sound Blaster® Audigy® 2 NX
|
| http://www.soundblaster.com/products...4&product=9103
|
| KW
|
|
I agree, the USB Cyberphone(K) is superb. ( with or without skype)
"Paul Westwell" <paul@nospam.me.uk> wrote in message
news:Tdu9f.27723$65.15133@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
| No they are not all like this, you have to be very careful....
|
| I can recommend two USB devices, the first is a hardwired CyberphoneK
| (www.voipvoice.com) and the second a DECT cordless USB phone primarily
aimed
| at Skype called the Dualphone (www.dualphone.net). I also use a USB
| plantronics headset (USB45 I think).
|
| Using either of these devices on a Skype to Skype call the audio quality
is
| awesome, I have heard nothing in 25 years of telecoms that comes close....
| yet! The Dualphone in particular is so good and does 16kbit sampling.
|
| I have bog standard onboard USB2 ports on both Asrock and gigabyte
| motherboards.
|
| Regards,
|
| Paul
|
|
| "OM" <om.newsgroup@gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:1130735079.614516.221720@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
| > I've just got a USB phone.
| > And it's rubbish!
| > OK... I can hear the other person and the other person can hear me.
| > But the sound uality is amazingly poor.
| > The make of the phone is Waitec... but I've seeen several phones
| > exactly the same looking under different badges.
| >
| > Is it just that I have a bad phone, or are they all like this?
| >
| > Thanks.
| >
| >
| > OM
| >
|
|
>
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3snj9kFo9a6oU1@individual.net...
>
>> Bandwidth, I don't know, I haven't checked recently. Codec, proprietary.
>> Nobody except Skype know the full details.
>
> The Skype sound engine is powered by Global IP Sound and is not
> proprietary. The following link decribes the GIPS engine
> http://www.globalipsound.com/datasheets/VoiceEngine.pdf
Whether or not it's proprietary is debatable, however, the only way it is
usable is with the binary-only Skype software which makes it pretty useless
as part of a broader telecoms system. Of course, if you happen to know more
about it than anyone else, you can always write a Skype channel driver for
Asterisk and claim yourself US$1545
eBay seem a little bit more enlightened when it comes to opening up APIs and
interfaces to developers, so who knows, maybe they'll reveal all?
[/me pictures everyone at eBay HQ calling each other on cheap'n'nasty USB
'phones'...]
--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (gebssnfxl@ubgznvy.pbz)
08:33:45 up 1 day, 12:08, 3 users, load average: 0.59, 0.33, 0.26
This is my BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMSTICK
"alexd" <look@my.sig> wrote in message news:1374166.P4zAur0mzo@ale.cx...
>> http://www.globalipsound.com/datasheets/VoiceEngine.pdf
>
> Whether or not it's proprietary is debatable, however, the only way it is
> usable is with the binary-only Skype software which makes it pretty
> useless
> as part of a broader telecoms system.
I believe voipbuster is also powered by the same/similar engine.