On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:34:39 +0000 (UTC),
gordon@lion.drogon.net
(Gordon Henderson) wrote:
>In article <9VDOg.33918$DB3.11900@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net>,
>Daviey Walker <daviey.walker@virginREMOVE.network> wrote:
>>Brian A wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know how much you are intending to spend but for the price of
>>> some of these Skype add-ons you can buy an ATA that doesn't need a
>>> computer to work.
>>
>><SNIP>
>>
>>The OP said it was for his daughter at University. If she is in halls
>>or doesn't have access to the router then she will be unable to forward
>>the necessary ports. There are workarounds, but not as easy as a skype
>>handset.
>>
>>Edit: The OP also said he was planning on using it with sipdiscount, has
>>anybody tested this without port forwarding?
>
>If sipdiscount provide a STUN server and the softphone/ATA supports it
>then you ought to be OK without port forwarding. (at least thats been
>my experience so-far)
>
>But persuading the providers to support IAX2 and persuading more phone/ATA
>vendors to support it too would be better...
>
>Gordon
I take your point re the router but some ATAs are designed to
interface between the modem and the computer.
As far as STUN servers are concerned you don't have to use the one
belonging to the VSP you are using.
It would be interesting to know how SIP voip fares in a University
system. If anyone reading this has tried an ATA/SIP phone in such an
environment please post your comments.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.