On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:06:37 GMT, Bypass <user@example.net> wrote:
>Steve in Herts wrote:
>
>> The lights have gone out on my adaptor also but I am able to get to
>> www.voip.co.uk
>
>But can you sign in to your account?
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:14:46 GMT, Steve in Herts
<nospam@invalidaddress.blob> wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:06:37 GMT, Bypass <user@example.net> wrote:
>
>>Steve in Herts wrote:
>>
>>> The lights have gone out on my adaptor also but I am able to get to
>>> www.voip.co.uk
>>
>>But can you sign in to your account?
>
>I can at this link
>
>https://my.voip.co.uk/login/?continu...b2lwLmNvLnVrLw
>
>But the phone service isn't working.
It is for me.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
Skype Free Zone!!
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:50:25 +0100, ACDeag
<KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> wrote:
>It happens that Brian A formulated :
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:14:46 GMT, Steve in Herts
>> <nospam@invalidaddress.blob> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:06:37 GMT, Bypass <user@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Steve in Herts wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The lights have gone out on my adaptor also but I am able to get to
>>>>> www.voip.co.uk
>>>>
>>>> But can you sign in to your account?
>>>
>>> I can at this link
>>>
>>> https://my.voip.co.uk/login/?continu...b2lwLmNvLnVrLw
>>>
>>> But the phone service isn't working.
>> It is for me.
>>
>> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
>> Skype Free Zone!!
>
>Are you using your own adapter or one of their supplied adapter?
>
It happens that Brian A formulated :
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:14:46 GMT, Steve in Herts
> <nospam@invalidaddress.blob> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:06:37 GMT, Bypass <user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Steve in Herts wrote:
>>>
>>>> The lights have gone out on my adaptor also but I am able to get to
>>>> www.voip.co.uk
>>>
>>> But can you sign in to your account?
>>
>> I can at this link
>>
>> https://my.voip.co.uk/login/?continu...b2lwLmNvLnVrLw
>>
>> But the phone service isn't working.
> It is for me.
>
> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
> Skype Free Zone!!
Are you using your own adapter or one of their supplied adapter?
On 2006-10-21 08:46:24 +0100, ACDeag <KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> said:
> Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone
> out on the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
Dialling 121 or the 0845 number for access to voicemail wasn't working
for me but other than that it was ok. Email to voip.co.uk was failing
for me as well.
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:03:32 GMT, Steve in Herts
<nospam@invalidaddress.blob> wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:46:24 +0100, ACDeag
><KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> wrote:
>
>>Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone
>>out on the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
>>
>
>The lights have gone out on my adaptor also but I am able to get to
>www.voip.co.uk
>
>Steve
I seem to have fixed the problem by changing the DNS Server
Configuration for the adaptor WAN settings from manual to automatic.
But the voip.co.uk provisioning server keeps resetting this back to
manual so as a temporary measure, I have disabled access to the
provisioning server from the adaptor while I await a more permanent
solution from voip.co.uk.
ACDeag formulated the question :
> Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone out on
> the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
Today's troubles and previous complaints by people saying they cannot
get through to me has made me ask BT to reconect me.
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:26:42 +0100, ACDeag
<KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> wrote:
>ACDeag formulated the question :
>> Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone out on
>> the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
>
>Today's troubles and previous complaints by people saying they cannot
>get through to me has made me ask BT to reconect me.
To be fair, I have had very few problems with voip.co.uk. Today has
been the only day there have been problems but I have only been with
them for 3 months. But for 1.99/month, it's not bad for free off-peak
calls.
Steve in Herts expressed precisely :
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:26:42 +0100, ACDeag
> <KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> wrote:
>
>> ACDeag formulated the question :
>>> Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone out on
>>> the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
>>
>> Today's troubles and previous complaints by people saying they cannot
>> get through to me has made me ask BT to reconect me.
>
> To be fair, I have had very few problems with voip.co.uk. Today has
> been the only day there have been problems but I have only been with
> them for 3 months. But for 1.99/month, it's not bad for free off-peak
> calls.
>
> Steve
I agree from my point of view it has been mostly faultless and I will
keep the line, however a number of people complain that sometimes they
cannot get through despite the box showing it is online.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:55:21 GMT, ACDeag <RCOFZMZCCYAR@spammotel.com>
wrote:
>Steve in Herts expressed precisely :
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:26:42 +0100, ACDeag
>> <KETVHJWQLQFD@spammotel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ACDeag formulated the question :
>>>> Anyone having trouble with voip.co.uk this morning. Lights have gone out on
>>>> the adaptor and the website is unobtainable.
>>>
>>> Today's troubles and previous complaints by people saying they cannot
>>> get through to me has made me ask BT to reconect me.
>>
>> To be fair, I have had very few problems with voip.co.uk. Today has
>> been the only day there have been problems but I have only been with
>> them for 3 months. But for 1.99/month, it's not bad for free off-peak
>> calls.
>>
>> Steve
>
>I agree from my point of view it has been mostly faultless and I will
>keep the line, however a number of people complain that sometimes they
>cannot get through despite the box showing it is online.
>
I just use voip.co.uk for outgoing calls and I always find it
reliable. The incoming senario may be less reliable but I abandoned
that a long time ago as I preferred an alternative voicemail system.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
Skype Free Zone!!
> I just use voip.co.uk for outgoing calls and I always find it
> reliable. The incoming senario may be less reliable but I abandoned
> that a long time ago as I preferred an alternative voicemail system.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:06:37 GMT, Bypass <user@example.net> wrote:
>Brian A wrote:
>
>> I just use voip.co.uk for outgoing calls and I always find it
>> reliable. The incoming senario may be less reliable but I abandoned
>> that a long time ago as I preferred an alternative voicemail system.
>
>Brian, do you mind saying which one?
Well, without being specific ...
It is possible to use
voipfone
voiptalk
easypabx
or even voxalot if you can forward your number.
There are lots to choose from that have a better voicemail system and
I don't think you will have to go at all far down the list to find the
best one. The quality of web site matches the quality of service I'd
say. The problem with the voip.co.uk voicemail is that it only allows
you to listen to a message once then it is automatically erased. Of
course you can pick it up on the Net but, personally, I don't think
that is a very satisfactory. However, using voip.co.uk for outgoing
calls and an alternative for incominng calls operates very well for
me. The only disadvantage is the CLI problem. In practice I don't find
it to be a problem. There is a message on the voip.co.uk voicemal to
direct to my incoming number and I only give my number to a limited
set of people anyway.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
Skype Free Zone!!
"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> I just use voip.co.uk for outgoing calls and I always find it
> reliable. The incoming senario may be less reliable but I abandoned
> that a long time ago as I preferred an alternative voicemail system.
>
>
When I was talking to voip.co.uk support a couple of weeks ago they
mentioned that they will soon be upgrading their voicemail system soon. So
hopefully there will be some big improvements.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:09:49 +0100, "Phil" <nospam@nospam.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> I just use voip.co.uk for outgoing calls and I always find it
>> reliable. The incoming senario may be less reliable but I abandoned
>> that a long time ago as I preferred an alternative voicemail system.
>>
>>
>When I was talking to voip.co.uk support a couple of weeks ago they
>mentioned that they will soon be upgrading their voicemail system soon. So
>hopefully there will be some big improvements.
>
On Feb. 8th this year I received an email which stated.
" We are also taking steps to provide a better
voicemail service in the near future."
I got fed up with waiting. I am still awaiting the sorting out of my
account since all the billing went wrong in March. However, as,
previously stated, I am happy with outgoing calls on voip.co.uk and I
still recommend them to people on that basis.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
Skype Free Zone!!
voip.co.uk 
Linear Mode
