Go Back   Wireless and Wifi Forums > Wireless Networks (Wifi) > Wireless Networking Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2005, 11:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Pamerston North
Posts: 32
Default

I have been playing around with a 27km link over the last week it seem to work ok but the data transfer is a bit slow 12-18KB/s max <_<
What were are using is

Site one Edimax EW-7207APg runing in Ap Mode with 3 meters of RG58 Cable and a 24dBi Grid Antennas

Site two Edimax EW-7206APb runing in Client Mode with 2 feet of LMR100 Cable and a 24dBi Grid Antennas



Packets: Sent = 1000, Received = 1000, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 68ms, Average = 4ms

What to do next
Shorten the Cable to around 2 feet on the first unit
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2005, 01:00 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 670
Default

Looks like a very noisy signal, but I guess you'd get that on a link that long

Try replacing the coax you're using with LMR400 or some other low loss cable, I don't think RG58 is very good

But congrats on actually getting a signal
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2005, 04:04 AM
Mad-Mendez's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Palmerston North
Posts: 94
Send a message via ICQ to Mad-Mendez
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Noodles@Jul 28 2005, 11:00 PM
Looks like a very noisy signal, but I guess you'd get that on a link that long

Try replacing the coax you're using with LMR400 or some other low loss cable, I don't think RG58 is very good

But congrats on actually getting a signal
[snapback]4819[/snapback]
I concur with noodles, every bit will help i suppose, hmmm would slapping on an amplifer make it better or not? Though that would then start getting into dicey territory with going way over EIRP wouldnt it?

Quite impressed though, and suprised that the green signal value is almost constant (very few peaks etc). The graphs of snr ive seen frm netstumbler have always been all over the place (like the noise in red).
__________________
<span style='colorurple'><a href='http://homepages.inspire.net.nz/~gladwin' target='_blank'>More on Mad-Mendez</a>

<a href='http://www.pnhrc.org.nz' target='_blank'>Palmerston North Hot Rod Club - Go hard or go home</a></span>
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2005, 07:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Pamerston North
Posts: 32
Default

Is it worth going out and buying 3 meters of LMR400 and two Categories and loss 0.65 dB for 3 meters or put the AP in a box on the pole and shorten the RG58 to around 2 feet and loss 0.5dB

I was thinking about putting a booster on it but with the EIRP limits it is holding me back

Does any one know if the are going do be doing the some way the USA EIRP works
here is how it works over there with Point to point links

Point to point links are also permitted with directional antenna. The maximum transmitter input to the antenna reduces by 1dB for every 3dB increase in antenna gain above 6dBi. The maximum e.i.r.p. for point to point links is summarised in the following table:
Table 3 - Summary of e.i.r.p. Allowed in USA at 2.4GHz
Transmitter output Max. Antenna gain Max. e.i.r.p.
1W 6dBi 4W
0.5W 15dBi 16W
0.25W 24dBi 63W

When I did the scan it was starting to rain that’s way I was getting a noisy signal


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2005, 02:28 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 670
Default

I wouldn't amplify if I were you, adding an amp in the mix will amplify the noise as well.

I would try using a short length of lmr400 if you can. Stay away from RG58 if possible

Check the attenuation charts: http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/cab...perf.html#atten (lower is better)

Then try the test again when it isn't raining and see if you get a better signal/throughput.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2005, 01:34 AM
Mad-Mendez's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Palmerston North
Posts: 94
Send a message via ICQ to Mad-Mendez
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Noodles@Jul 30 2005, 12:28 AM
I wouldn't amplify if I were you, adding an amp in the mix will amplify the noise as well.

I would try using a short length of lmr400 if you can.
Then try the test again when it isn't raining and see if you get a better signal/throughput.
[snapback]4822[/snapback]
Yes there is the amplifying of the noise as well as noodles has mentioned, mostly the eirp holding you back though. Damn limits...

POE should help you cut down the length of cable as much as possible, which is what youve said pretty much. In the end it does come down to money, just probably reuse the cable...
Hmm is it possible to reuse the 2 feet of lmr 100 cable? 1 foot for the first site? and the other 1 foot for the other? See that way you can save money and minimise loss in the cable.

Well, rain... over a shortish distance its bad enough, its got to be vicious over a 27 Km distance! try it again when its not raining, id say it would make a HUGE difference.

Also im curious as to what the longest link is in New Zealand.
If you need some help maybe these guys could help? But looking at their links, youve got the longest one so far

http://www.crc.net.nz/topology.php

Congrats.

Finally, where DID you get pretty pictures like that from?? i want! i want! What software and maps did you use?
__________________
<span style='colorurple'><a href='http://homepages.inspire.net.nz/~gladwin' target='_blank'>More on Mad-Mendez</a>

<a href='http://www.pnhrc.org.nz' target='_blank'>Palmerston North Hot Rod Club - Go hard or go home</a></span>
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2005, 06:59 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mad-Mendez@Jul 30 2005, 02:34 PM
Finally, where DID you get pretty pictures like that from?? i want! i want! What software and maps did you use?
[snapback]4824[/snapback]

Hey there guys, Yes we have managed to up our throughput to about 30Kb/s, (Im at Site 1), The program you want for the cool mapping is called "Google Earth" download it free from Google.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2005, 09:12 AM
Mad-Mendez's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Palmerston North
Posts: 94
Send a message via ICQ to Mad-Mendez
Default

"google Earth" you say? Id heard about that but hadnt bothered to install it due to the lack of detailed maps like the ones for New York City and so on. Though after seeing that ill play around with it. Cheers.
__________________
<span style='colorurple'><a href='http://homepages.inspire.net.nz/~gladwin' target='_blank'>More on Mad-Mendez</a>

<a href='http://www.pnhrc.org.nz' target='_blank'>Palmerston North Hot Rod Club - Go hard or go home</a></span>
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Link 60 Km dbuenosilva Wireless Networking Discussion 3 03-30-2007 03:55 PM
Short wireless link. Adair Witner alt.internet.wireless 4 03-05-2007 01:29 PM
Turn key parts for point-to-point link? Nate Bargmann alt.internet.wireless 9 11-17-2006 12:55 PM
Measuring link quality jbapereira Hardware Discussion 2 03-30-2006 01:18 AM
The Quest for the perfect backhaul link Beccara NZ Wireless 18 09-17-2004 09:43 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45